The House Ethics Committee says it is opening its own investigation — sort of — into possible misconduct by indicted Rep. Michael Grimm, but that it won’t get started right away.
“The Department of Justice has asked the committee to defer consideration of the matters in the investigative subcommittee’s jurisdiction,” said Reps. Mike Conaway, R-Texas, and Linda Sanchez, D-Calif., in a joint statement Friday announcing the ethics inquiry.
When, and if, the House inquiry does ever begin, Conaway and Sanchez said they will themselves serve as the top two lawmakers on the investigative subpanel that has been already appointed by the committee.
The announcement of the Ethics Committee’s action was not unexpected. If and when the investigative subcommittee does proceed with a probe — and the entire committee ultimately agrees with any finding of misconduct — punitive actions the House could take against Grimm, a Republican from Staten Island, range from a “letter of reproval” to a recommendation of expulsion, a decision that would require a full-blown Ethics Committee inquiry.
Grimm, 44, a former FBI agent, was indicted last month by federal prosecutors in New York on 20 counts of fraud, perjury, mail and wire fraud, and other charges tied to his Manhattan restaurant. Among accusations is that he tried to hide more than $1 million in revenue, and prosecutors also said he hired undocumented immigrants.
Grimm has pleaded not guilty and is free on bond.
And for now, news of an impending House Ethics Committee investigation would appear to be one of the lesser legal worries facing Grimm.
In fact, Friday’s announcement was essentially a formality. “Under the House Rules, today’s routine announcement by the Committee on Ethics was fully expected,” said Grimm’s attorney, William McGinley.
That’s because House rules require the committee to make a decision on whether to open such an investigation “not later than 30 days after a member of the House is indicted or otherwise formally charged with criminal conduct in any Federal, State or local court.”
When it does proceed with an inquiry, the committee is responsible for investigating whether House members have violated the chamber’s Code of Official Conduct or “any law, regulation, or other applicable standard of conduct” in the performance of their duties or the discharge of his responsibilities.
The announcement Friday said that joining Conaway and Sanchez on the investigative subpanel are Reps. Charlie Dent, R-Pa., and Ted Deutch, D-Fla. But the panel’s work is being put off.
The Justice Department asked it to defer action, as federal prosecutors continue putting together their case. In response, Conaway and Sanchez said, “The Committee, following precedent, unanimously voted to recommend to the Investigative Subcommittee that it defer action on its investigation at this time.”
What We're Following See More »
After keeping the information private for most of the lead-up to the debate on Monday, it has been revealed that longtime Clinton aide Philippe Reines has been playing the role of Donald Trump in her debate prep. Reines knows Clinton better than most, able to identify both her strengths and weaknesses, and his selection for a sparring partner shows that Clinton is preparing for the brash and confrontational Donald Trump many have come to expect.
- A national Washington Post/ABC News poll shows Clinton leading Trump by just two points among likely voters, 46% to 44%.
- A national Bloomberg poll out Monday morning by Selzer & Co. has Clinton and Trump tied at 46% in a two-way race, and Trump ahead 43% to 41% in a four-way race.
- A CNN/ORC poll in Colorado shows likely voters’ support for Trump at 42%, 41% for Clinton, and a CNN/ORC poll in Pennsylvania has Clinton at 45% and Trump at 44%.
- A Portland Press Herald/UNH survey in Maine has Clinton leading Trump in ME-01 and Trump ahead in ME-02.
More than 30 times, in the case of some donors. Long before Cruz endorsed Trump—and before he even snubbed the nominee at the Republican National Convention—"the senator quietly began renting his vast donor email file to his former rival, pocketing at least tens of thousands of dollars, and more likely hundreds of thousands, that can be used to bankroll the Texan’s own political future."