Conflict of Interest Alleged in U.K. Atomic Regulator’s Work

Global Security Newswire Staff
Add to Briefcase
Global Security Newswire Staff
May 27, 2014, 9:14 a.m.

The U.K. atom­ic reg­u­lat­or’s tech­nic­al con­tracts have cre­ated con­flicts of in­terest that threaten the of­fice’s abil­ity to do its job, the Lon­don In­de­pend­ent re­ports.

The Of­fice for Nuc­le­ar Reg­u­la­tion cur­rently re­ceives sup­port from some of the same firms it is re­quired to reg­u­late, in­clud­ing the U.S. en­gin­eer­ing con­glom­er­ate Jac­obs, which is a mem­ber of the Atom­ic Weapons Es­tab­lish­ment con­sor­ti­um that designs and pro­duces com­pon­ents of the Brit­ish nuc­le­ar ar­sen­al, ac­cord­ing to the Tues­day art­icle.

In April, the watch­dog or­gan­iz­a­tion awar­ded Jac­obs a five-year con­tract to provide tech­nic­al as­sist­ance in such areas as ex­amin­ing de­con­tam­in­a­tion and ex­tern­al risks re­lated to on­go­ing work at atom­ic sites and new re­act­or designs.

Nuc­le­ar Waste Ad­vis­ory As­so­ci­ates mem­ber Dav­id Lowry ar­gued the reg­u­lat­or’s tech­nic­al ad­vice con­tracts clearly rep­res­ent a “con­flict of in­terest.”

“It’s such a straight­for­ward con­flict of in­terest. This is in­defens­ible,” Lowry said.

While Of­fice for Nuc­le­ar Reg­u­la­tion chair­man Nick Bald­win ac­know­ledged that “we have these con­cerns, too,” he said there ex­is­ted only a “small gene pool” of com­pan­ies with the abil­ity to fur­nish the tech­nic­al re­com­mend­a­tions that his in­spect­ors need to per­form their jobs. He said no in­di­vidu­als that provide ad­vice to the reg­u­lat­or also work on the pro­jects that his agency is in charge of over­see­ing.

“ONR would not tol­er­ate a situ­ation in which a per­son car­ry­ing out an as­sess­ment for ONR is also work­ing on a re­lated mat­ter for a cur­rent or pro­spect­ive li­censee,” an uniden­ti­fied spokes­man from the reg­u­lat­or said. “Should a po­ten­tial con­flict of in­terest emerge, we have a clear pro­tocol that provides a ro­bust pro­cess and defines clear cri­ter­ia against which the emer­ging con­flict can be judged.”

What We're Following See More »
SAYS TRUMP JUST ATTACKING REPUBLICANS
Former Top Aide to McConnell Says GOPers Should Abandon Trump
2 days ago
THE LATEST
“YOU CAN’T CHANGE HISTORY, BUT YOU CAN LEARN FROM IT”
Trump Defends Confederate Statues in Tweetstorm
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE
CEOS HAVE BEEN FLEEING FOR THE EXITS
Trump to End Business Councils
3 days ago
THE LATEST
FROM STATEMENT
McConnell: “No Good Neo-Nazis”
3 days ago
THE LATEST
NO FORMAL LEGISLATIVE EFFORT
CBC Members Call for Removal of Confederate Statues from Capitol
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Members of the Congressional Black Caucus are reviving calls to remove Confederate statues from the Capitol following the violence at a white nationalist rally in Virginia." Rep. Cedric Richmond, the group's chair, told ABC News that "we will never solve America's race problem if we continue to honor traitors who fought against the United States." And Mississippi Rep. Bennie Thompson said, “Confederate memorabilia have no place in this country and especially not in the United States Capitol." But a CBC spokesperson said no formal legislative effort is afoot.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login