The U.K. atomic regulator’s technical contracts have created conflicts of interest that threaten the office’s ability to do its job, the London Independent reports.
The Office for Nuclear Regulation currently receives support from some of the same firms it is required to regulate, including the U.S. engineering conglomerate Jacobs, which is a member of the Atomic Weapons Establishment consortium that designs and produces components of the British nuclear arsenal, according to the Tuesday article.
In April, the watchdog organization awarded Jacobs a five-year contract to provide technical assistance in such areas as examining decontamination and external risks related to ongoing work at atomic sites and new reactor designs.
Nuclear Waste Advisory Associates member David Lowry argued the regulator’s technical advice contracts clearly represent a “conflict of interest.”
“It’s such a straightforward conflict of interest. This is indefensible,” Lowry said.
While Office for Nuclear Regulation chairman Nick Baldwin acknowledged that “we have these concerns, too,” he said there existed only a “small gene pool” of companies with the ability to furnish the technical recommendations that his inspectors need to perform their jobs. He said no individuals that provide advice to the regulator also work on the projects that his agency is in charge of overseeing.
“ONR would not tolerate a situation in which a person carrying out an assessment for ONR is also working on a related matter for a current or prospective licensee,” an unidentified spokesman from the regulator said. “Should a potential conflict of interest emerge, we have a clear protocol that provides a robust process and defines clear criteria against which the emerging conflict can be judged.”
What We're Following See More »
"A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found that 34% of registered voters think the three presidential debates would be extremely or quite important in helping them decide whom to support for president. About 11% of voters are considered 'debate persuadables'—that is, they think the debates are important and are either third-party voters or only loosely committed to either major-party candidate."
Will he or won't he? That's the question surrounding Donald Trump and his on-again, off-again threats to bring onetime Bill Clinton paramour Gennifer Flowers to the debate as his guest. An assistant to flowers initially said she'd be there, but Trump campaign chief Kellyanne Conway "said on ABC’s 'This Week' that the Trump campaign had not invited Flowers to the debate, but she didn’t rule out the possibility of Flowers being in the audience."
NBC's Lester Holt hasn't hosted the "Nightly News" since Tuesday, as he's prepped for moderating the first presidential debate tonight—and the first of his career. He's called on a host of NBC talent to help him, namely NBC News and MSNBC chairman Andy Lack; NBC News president Deborah Turness; the news division's senior vice president of editorial, Janelle Rodriguez; "Nightly News" producer Sam Singal, "Meet the Press" host Chuck Todd, senior political editor Mark Murray and political editor Carrie Dann. But during the debate itself, the only person in Holt's earpiece will be longtime debate producer Marty Slutsky.
"The House passed legislation late Thursday that would prohibit the federal government from making any cash payments to Iran, in protest of President Obama's recently discovered decision to pay Iran $1.7 billion in cash in January. And while the White House has said Obama would veto the bill, 16 Democrats joined with Republicans to pass the measure, 254-163."
In contrast to Hillary Clinton's meticulous debate practice sessions, Donald Trump "is largely shunning traditional debate preparations, but has been watching video of…Clinton’s best and worst debate moments, looking for her vulnerabilities.” Trump “has paid only cursory attention to briefing materials. He has refused to use lecterns in mock debate sessions despite the urging of his advisers. He prefers spitballing ideas with his team rather than honing them into crisp, two-minute answers.”