America’s longest war just got a little longer. President Barack Obama will announce that he would like to keep 9,800 troops in Afghanistan to continue fighting past the planned 2014 end of the war ““ and those troops would all leave by the end of 2016, according to a senior administration official.
The official said the president will make the announcement in the Rose Garden on Wednesday afternoon. “He will announce that our combat mission will be over by the end of 2014. He will make clear that we are open to continued efforts in Afghanistan on two narrow missions after 2014: training Afghan Forces and supporting [counterterrorism] operations against the remnants of al Qaeda,” a senior administration official said. “We will only sustain a military presence after 2014 if the Afghan government signs the Bilateral Security Agreement.”
Both of the leading candidates to succeed Afghan President Hamid Karzai have said they would sign the agreement that would govern American forces serving in Afghanistan past this year. A runoff is planned, and could take weeks or months to complete. “Assuming a BSA is signed, at the beginning of 2015, we will have 9,800 U.S. service members in different parts of the country, together with our NATO allies and other partners. By the end of 2015, we would reduce that presence by roughly half, consolidating U.S. troops in Kabul and on Bagram Airfield. And one year later, by the end of 2016, we will draw down to a normal Embassy presence with a security assistance office in Kabul, as we have done in Iraq,” the senior official said.
Obama made a surprise visit to Afghanistan over Memorial Day weekend but did not meet with Karzai. Obama told the troops at Bagram Air Base that they had been successful in their mission during the past 13 years of war in Afghanistan.
“With that bilateral security agreement, assuming it is signed, we can plan for a limited military presence in Afghanistan beyond 2014. Because after all the sacrifices we’ve made, we want to preserve the gains that you have helped to win. And we’re going to make sure that Afghanistan can never again, ever, be used again to launch an attack against our country,” Obama said.
There are currently about 30,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan, mostly advising and assisting the Afghan security forces. The post-2014 force of 9,800 U.S. troops would be in addition to a smaller number of NATO troops
What We're Following See More »
The White House on Wednesday laid out its plan for tax reform, with Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin saying it would be "the biggest tax cut and the largest tax reform in the history of our country." The tax code would be broken down into just three tax brackets, with the highest personal income tax rate cut from 39.6 percent to 35 percent. The plan would also slash the tax rate on corporations and small businesses from 35 percent to 15 percent. "The White House plan is a set of principles with few details, but it’s designed to be the starting point of a major push to urge Congress to pass a comprehensive tax reform package this year," said National Economic Council Director Gary Cohn.
"An emerging government funding deal would see Democrats agree to $15 billion in additional military funding in exchange for the GOP agreeing to fund healthcare subsidies, according to two congressional officials briefed on the talks. Facing a Friday deadline to pass a spending bill and avert a shutdown, Democrats are willing to go halfway to President Trump’s initial request of $30 billion in supplemental military funding."
The Michael Flynn story is not going away for the White House as it tries to refocus its attention. The White House has denied requests from the House Oversight Committee for information and documents regarding payments that the former national security adviser received from Russian state television station RT and Russian firms. House Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz and ranking member Elijah Cummings also said that Flynn failed to report these payments on his security clearance application. White House legislative director Marc Short argued that the documents requested are either not in the possession of the White House or contain sensitive information he believes is not applicable to the committee's stated investigation.