A former security officer at a nuclear-arms plant is challenging his termination over a break-in by peace advocates, the Knoxville News Sentinel reports.
Kirk Garland, 53, told a U.S. government mediator he took unfair blame for a breach made possible by systemic vulnerabilities at Tennessee’s Y-12 National Security Complex, the newspaper reported on Monday. Garland has demanded salary he would have been paid had he not lost his job. He was let go for purportedly acting carelessly as the first security officer to reach the July 2012 intrusion’s three participants.
“At the end of the day I stopped their actions, I detained them, I called for backup, we arrested them, I testified against them and they’re in prison,” Garland said. A federal judge in February handed multiple-year prison sentences to each of the “Transform Now Plowshares” activists, including octogenarian nun Megan Rice.
Garland argued that malfunctioning sensors and surveillance equipment enabled the group to cut through a series perimeter fences and enter the highest-security section of the facility. He said the trio was already well into its demonstration at the time of his arrival.
Detractors, though, have argued that Garland’s response could have enabled a more serious breach by extremists, had they staged a protest as a diversion. The trespassers’ actions included splashing blood and painting slogans on the facility’s storehouse for bomb-grade uranium.
Garland noted that he was initially praised for his role in detaining the antiwar advocates. “I was a hero for about two days and then I turned into a zero,” he said.
The fired guard lost his home and health insurance following termination, and he now suffers from a series of medical ailments.
Garland now works as a security officer at a Tennessee state prison. He cannot win back his old job because the site no longer uses his former employer, a division of G4S Government Solutions.
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.