What the Government Wants School Lunches to Look Like

Would you like some politics with your low-fat pudding?

National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Reena Flores and Marina Koren
May 28, 2014, 8:17 a.m.

The White House’s war on mys­tery meat has hit a snag.

This week, first lady Michelle Obama shot back at House Re­pub­lic­ans for res­ist­ing fed­er­al nu­tri­tion reg­u­la­tions for lunches at 100,000 pub­lic schools. “The last thing we can af­ford to do right now is play polit­ics with our kids’ health,” she said Wed­nes­day dur­ing a meet­ing with nu­tri­tion lead­ers.

House Re­pub­lic­ans are try­ing to roll back changes to school lunches in­tro­duced in 2012 through a pro­posed 2015 Ag­ri­cul­ture De­part­ment spend­ing bill. They’re look­ing for a one-year delay to the re­quire­ments, which push healthy in­gredi­ents in and junk food out, to give schools more time to com­ply. Here’s what those reg­u­la­tions look like and how they’re dif­fer­ent from the old school lunches:

To the dis­ap­point­ment of some young stu­dents, the stand­ards in­volve more of the good stuff, like fruits, ve­get­ables and whole grains, and less of the bad, such as salt-coated fries smothered in melted cheese.

“We all share the goal of ad­dress­ing child­hood obesity and serving health­i­er meals to our stu­dents, but the top-down, one-size-fits-all ap­proach by the White House on this is­sue simply isn’t work­ing,’ Rep. Rod­ney Dav­is, R-Ill., said in a state­ment to Politico‘s Morn­ing Ag­ri­cul­ture news­let­ter on Wed­nes­day.

In­deed, al­though 90 per­cent of schools already meet the 2012 nu­tri­tion stand­ards, some school of­fi­cials say the healthy re­quire­ments are “just too chal­len­ging.” To them, the White House says, “Tough.” 


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.