Why Terrorists Love Twitter

A Q&A with a leading scholar on terrorism and media.

A computer screen shot taken on July 12, 2010, shows the cover of the newly-released first edition of the Yemen-based Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula's (AQAP) 'Inspire' magazine, an on-line publication with articles including 'Make a Bomb in the Kitchen of Your Mom'.
National Journal
Laura Ryan
June 2, 2014, 1 a.m.

“Try to think like a ter­ror­ist for a second. Would you like to get — free-of-charge — satel­lite ser­vices? Of course, you would,” says Gab­ri­el Wei­mann. “Now think about Google Earth.”

In­deed, it was Google Earth that mem­bers of the ter­ror­ist group Lashkar-e-Tayy­iba used to help plan the 2008 Mum­bai ter­ror spree that killed more than 150 people, says Wei­mann, a lead­ing schol­ar of ter­ror­ism and me­dia. The at­tack­ers used the satel­lite ima­gines to mem­or­ize land­marks, help­ing them to bet­ter co­ordin­ate and carry out the string of shoot­ings and bomb­ings.

Ter­ror­ist groups around the world have quickly learned how to ma­nip­u­late the Web and so­cial me­dia, an in­ven­tion of the West, against the West, and it is re­shap­ing the war on ter­ror.

Wei­mann, a fel­low at the Woo­drow Wilson Cen­ter and pro­fess­or at Haifa Uni­versity in Is­rael, has been study­ing the re­la­tion­ship between ter­ror­ism and mass me­dia since the early days of the In­ter­net and has just pub­lished a new re­port titled “New Ter­ror­ism and New Me­dia.”

Ac­cord­ing to the re­port, ter­ror­ist groups are us­ing so­cial-me­dia sites — in­clud­ing Twit­ter, Face­book, In­s­tagram, You­Tube, and Flickr — to spread their pro­pa­ganda and raise funds, as well as to re­cruit and train new mem­bers.

Wei­mann says that the same so­cial-me­dia tool could be a boon to the U.S. and oth­er na­tions seek­ing to counter ter­ror­ists and their nar­rat­ive. But thus far, he says, ter­ror­ists are do­ing a bet­ter job than gov­ern­ments at us­ing the me­di­um.

That does not mean coun­terter­ror­ism forces have been en­tirely feck­less — in­form­a­tion gleaned from the In­ter­net has helped foil many ter­ror­ist plots. But to get ahead, gov­ern­ments needs to treat so­cial me­dia as a “new arena” in the war on ter­ror that re­quires “new sol­diers, new weapons, and new reg­u­la­tions of course, but also new tac­tics.”

“If we leave the stage open only to their nar­rat­ives, we may lose the battle. But if we can find that we can use the same plat­forms to tar­get the same “¦ as their tar­get “¦ with al­tern­at­ive mes­sages, that might be a dif­fer­ent type of war,” Wei­mann said.

Na­tion­al Journ­al re­cently caught up with Wei­mann. That con­ver­sa­tion is be­low, lightly ed­ited for brev­ity and con­tinu­ity.

How long have you been track­ing the re­la­tion­ship between ter­ror­ism and so­cial me­dia?

Al­most 16 years ago, we star­ted look­ing on the In­ter­net be­cause ter­ror­ists star­ted us­ing the In­ter­net. At that time, about 12 web­sites emerged on­line, in­clud­ing al-Qaida. Ever since then, we’ve been mon­it­or­ing the use of the In­ter­net and on­line plat­forms by ter­ror­ist groups”¦. Today we are look­ing at over 9,800 ter­ror­ist web­sites on top of all the so­cial me­dia from In­s­tagram and Flickr and You­Tube and Twit­ter and Face­book and so on.

How has your re­search evolved since you began in 1998?

The num­bers changed after 9/11. Many ter­ror­ist groups, es­pe­cially those re­lated to Ji­hadi move­ments, es­pe­cially those of al-Qaida “¦ moved to cy­ber­space. The war on ter­ror­ism ac­tu­ally made it very hard for them to meet on ground to con­duct, let’s say, train­ing camps and preach­ing camps on the ground, and they ac­tu­ally moved to cy­ber­space as a res­ult. Es­pe­cially after 9/11, we saw a dra­mat­ic rise in ter­ror­ist web­sites and the num­bers grew to thou­sands.

Why do ter­ror­ists like so­cial me­dia?

I would ar­gue that the, let’s call it mi­gra­tion to so­cial me­dia is sup­por­ted by oth­er trends. One of them is the de­sire for in­ter­activ­ity”¦. Second, they know ex­actly who are the people ac­cess­ing so­cial me­dia, and these are es­pe­cially young people that are per­fect tar­get groups for them, es­pe­cially if we speak about rad­ic­al­iz­a­tion and re­cruit­ment.”¦ The third is that so­cial me­dia, I would ar­gue, lets them knock on your door…. And the last one that I would high­light is the move to, es­pe­cially among ji­hadists and al-Qaida-af­fil­i­ated groups, the new term “lone-wolf ter­ror­ism” [which is ter­ror­ism by in­di­vidu­als out­side a tra­di­tion­al group].

How is so­cial me­dia aid­ing this trend of “lone-wolf” ter­ror­ism?

I would ar­gue that lone wolves are not really lone wolves. There is a vir­tu­al pack be­hind them. There is some­body who trained them, who guided them, who launched them, and again so­cial me­dia are very use­ful when it comes to launch­ing lone-wolf cam­paigns.

Go back one year to Bo­ston.”¦ If you think about those two broth­ers, we found their foot­prints on­line, let it be in Twit­ter, let it be Face­book and in You­Tube, what did they down­load, what did they look at? “¦ If you look at the web­sites they vis­ited and what they down­loaded, you’ll find that those lone wolves were not alone.

Aside from the Mum­bai at­tack, what oth­er ter­ror­ist strikes have been aided by so­cial me­dia?

[In April 2013, the Syr­i­an Elec­tron­ic Army at­tacked the As­so­ci­ated Press’s Twit­ter ac­count] and sent a mes­sage to mil­lions of read­ers of the AP’s Twit­ter that said “Break­ing News: two ex­plo­sions in the White House and Barack Obama is in­jured.”

Now that was, of course, false. But the mar­ket plunged with­in minutes; the New York Stock Ex­change dropped $136 bil­lion dol­lars. So if you need any proof that they can hack, and they can use and at­tack Twit­ter, and even cause dam­age, here is a very dra­mat­ic ar­gu­ment.

What role has so­cial me­dia played in the mass kid­nap­pings in Ni­ger­ia? And does the #Bring­Back­Our­Girls Twit­ter cam­paign serve as an ex­ample of what West­ern na­tions can do to battle ter­ror­ism?

[Ni­ger­ia] is proof that even those groups like Boko Haram — that are very tra­di­tion­al, ex­tremely tra­di­tion­al groups [whose cause] is go­ing back to the old rules of Is­lam — are us­ing the most ad­vanced, non­re­li­gious tools of the In­ter­net.

[#Bring­Back­Our­Girls] re­in­forces my ar­gu­ment that if you want to counter this trend, you have to use the same plat­forms. That is to launch counter-com­plaints, to give an an­swer, to min­im­ize the ef­fect­ive­ness of their cam­paigns, you have to use the same plat­forms. Not to shut them down, but to launch your own cam­paigns and raise your own pub­lic opin­ion.

Boko Haram is fa­cing cri­ti­cism not only from West­ern so­ci­ety or non-Muslim so­ci­et­ies, but there is also a de­bate among ji­hadists them­selves, wheth­er Boko Haram didn’t go too far.

What have you found most sur­pris­ing in your re­search?

I think there is a his­tor­ic­al para­dox. The [In­ter­net and so­cial me­dia] were de­veloped and main­tained and spread all over the world by the West­ern coun­tries, by the West­ern mod­el of so­ci­ety. And who is us­ing it against the West­ern mod­el of so­ci­ety? Those groups that come from so­ci­et­ies and re­li­gious be­liefs that cri­ti­cize the West.”¦ They nev­er de­veloped any­thing about the In­ter­net or its many plat­forms. Nev­er — not even an inch of pro­gress. They only learned — and very fast — how to ad­opt our own devices against us.

How ef­fect­ive have counter-cam­paigns on so­cial me­dia been?

Amer­ica is known all over the world, for many years, as the coun­try of cam­paigns: polit­ic­al cam­paigns, com­mer­cial cam­paigns. If there is a state, if there is a coun­try, where you have the best know-how, the best ex­per­i­ence in terms of launch­ing counter-cam­paigns, selling cam­paigns, polit­ic­al cam­paigns, it is here. How come this know-how, this ex­pert­ise, this ex­per­i­ence, was not yet fully, cer­tainly not fully ex­er­cised and used when we are talk­ing about counter-ter­ror­ism cam­paigns?

What can the U.S. do right now to use so­cial me­dia more ef­fect­ively to com­bat ter­ror at­tacks?

First we have to re­cog­nize that we are fight­ing a new war on ter­ror­ism. It’s not 9/11 any­more.”¦ My main mes­sage is that we should not just look at the past and learn from the past, but we should also look at the fu­ture and try to pre­dict based on emer­ging trends how to get pre­pared for the next stage, let it be the use of so­cial me­dia or let it be the threat of ter­ror­ism.

What We're Following See More »
Freedom Caucus Members May Bolt the RSC
54 minutes ago

The Republican Study Committee may lose several members of the House Freedom Caucus next year, "potentially creating a split between two influential groups of House conservatives." The Freedom Caucus was founded at the inception of the current Congress by members who felt that the conservative RSC had gotten too cozy with leadership, "and its roughly 40 members have long clashed with the RSC over what tactics to use when pushing for conservative legislation." As many as 20 members may not join the RSC for the new Congress next year.

FDA Approves Emergency Zika Test
2 hours ago

"The U.S. Food and Drug Administration on Monday issued emergency authorization for a Zika diagnostics test from Swiss drugmaker Roche, skirting normal approval channels as the regulator moves to fight the disease's spread." Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal reports that a new study in Nature identifies "about a dozen substances" that could "suppress the pathogen's replication." Some of them are already in clinical trials.

Medicare Advantage Plans Overcharged Government
3 hours ago

According to 37 newly released audits, "some private Medicare plans overcharged the government for the majority of elderly patients they treated." A number of Medicare Advantage plans overstated "the severity of medical conditions like diabetes and depression." The money has since been paid back, though some plans are appealing the federal audits.

Omnibus Spending Bill Likely Getting a Lame-Duck Vote
3 hours ago

"GOP leaders and House Democrats are already laying the groundwork for a short-term continuing resolution" on the budget this fall "that will set up a vote on a catch-all spending bill right before the holidays." As usual, however, the House Freedom Caucus may throw a wrench in Speaker Paul Ryan's gears. The conservative bloc doesn't appear willing to accept any CR that doesn't fund the government into 2017.

Foreign Agents Have Hacked State Voting Databases
4 hours ago

"The FBI has uncovered evidence that foreign hackers penetrated two state election databases in recent weeks, prompting the bureau to warn election officials across the country to take new steps to enhance the security of their computer systems." Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson earlier this month conferred with state election officials, offering his department's assistance in scanning for vulnerabilities."