Rep. Scott Peters (D-CA-52) could perform an odd trick over the next few months: lose his primary but win the general election. How? California’s all-party primary offers a tempting opportunity to compare candidates ahead of the general election, but the Golden State has a track record of spitting out very different results in June and November.
— In 2012, nearly every Democratic House candidate matched against a Republican in California improved on their party’s primary vote share in the general election. (See the results in graphical form here.) That includes 8 districts, like Rep. Mark Takano‘s (D), where Democrats got less than half of the primary vote but went on to win the general. Takano got 59% in CA-41 after he and another Democrat combined for just 46% in the primary — leading some forecasters in DC and California to downgrade Takano’s chances after he won the nomination.
— The 2012 results confirm the trend from California’s previous two all-party primaries, in 1998 and 2000. In those years, Democrats improved their standing in 66 House races between primary and general, while Republicans only did it 17 times — mostly by marginal amounts in seats that were safely Democratic.
— Young people and especially Latinos are far less likely to turn out in California’s primaries, pushing the results away from what they look like with a full electorate in the fall. It’s the same effect that hurts Democratic performance in midterms versus presidential elections.
That’s not to say California Dems like Peters shouldn’t be worried about November; he and others will have tough races. But no one should use Tuesday’s primary results to write them off. Even though they match up potential opponents early on, all-party primaries are not as useful for comparing candidates as they seem.
— Scott Bland
What We're Following See More »
On a party-line vote, "the House Judiciary Committee defeated a Democratic effort Tuesday to obtain any information the Justice Department has on possible conflicts, ethical violations or improper connections to Russia by President Donald Trump and his associates. The committee’s Republican chairman, Bob Goodlatte, opposed the resolution, even as he acknowledged the Justice Department hasn’t acted on his own request for a briefing on alleged Russian interference with the U.S. election and potential ties to the Trump campaign." He said he'll be sending a letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions requesting him to pursue "all legitimate investigative leads" into those matters.
"President Donald Trump won’t sign a revised travel ban on Wednesday as had been anticipated, two senior administration officials confirmed. One of the officials indicated that the delay was due to the busy news cycle, and that when Trump does sign the revised order, he wanted it to get plenty of attention."
Near the end of his speech Tuesday, Donald Trump made a firm proclamation affirming his support for NATO. "We strongly support NATO, an alliance forged through the bonds of two World Wars that dethroned fascism, and a Cold War that defeated communism," Trump said. However, he continued on, "our partners must meet their financial obligations."
In his address to a joint session of Congress, Donald Trump called on the two chambers "to repeal and replace Obamacare with reforms that expand choice, increase access, lower costs, and at the same time, provide better Healthcare." The entire section of Republican members of Congress united in a standing ovation, while Democrats sat silently, with some even giving a thumbs down to the cameras. At one point, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi was shown shaking her head in disapproval. While Trump called for the repeal and replacement of Obamacare, he failed to give any specifics, though he did say those with preexisting conditions should have access to care and give flexibility back to the states.