A senior U.S. lawmaker wants the Obama administration to explain how it would respond if Iran and Russia finalize a “sanctions-busting” oil deal.
U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Ed Royce (R-Calif.) said the potential “oil-for-goods” plan would circumvent international efforts to squeeze concessions from Iran on its bomb-usable nuclear activities. In a Monday letter, he asked Secretary of State John Kerry to identify what “designation and enforcement steps” the administration would pursue if the potential $20 billion arrangement takes effect.
Negotiators for Russia, the United States and four other countries are offering Iran relief from economic pressure if the Middle Eastern nation significantly dials back its contested atomic efforts. Tehran denies it is seeking a nuclear-bomb capacity, and so far has not offered curbs sufficient to satisfy Washington and its allies.
Royce said the proposal for Iran to trade oil for nonmonetary goods from Russia “would present a clear violation of Iran’s obligations and would undermine the rationale behind the current negotiations.” Treasury Secretary Jack Lew in April said Washington could penalize groups or individuals that engage in trade under the possible pact, but he did not specify what legal authorities would permit such action.
The lawmaker also asked for a rundown of steps by Washington or its partners “to deter a potential deal.”
The United States contends that a six-month interim accord obligates Iran to cap its average daily oil exports to six key oil-importing nations at about a million barrels. Royce said the list does not include Russia, potentially enabling a barter deal to boost Tehran’s daily oil sales by up to half a million additional barrels.
Royce also aired concern over indications that Moscow may supply Iran with arms or nuclear systems under the proposed arrangement.
What We're Following See More »
"House Republicans are circulating the text of an amendment to their ObamaCare replacement bill that they believe could bring many conservatives on board. According to legislative text of the amendment," drafted by Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), "the measure would allow states to apply for waivers to repeal one of ObamaCare’s core protections for people with pre-existing conditions. Conservatives argue the provision drives up premiums for healthy people, but Democrats—and many more moderate Republicans—warn it would spark a return to the days when insurance companies could charge sick people exorbitantly high premiums."
President Trump on Wednesday "will order a review of national monuments created over the past 20 years with an aim toward rescinding or resizing some of them—part of a broader push to reopen areas to drilling, mining, and other development." Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke told reporters on Tuesday said he'd be reviewing about 30 monuments.
"An emerging government funding deal would see Democrats agree to $15 billion in additional military funding in exchange for the GOP agreeing to fund healthcare subsidies, according to two congressional officials briefed on the talks. Facing a Friday deadline to pass a spending bill and avert a shutdown, Democrats are willing to go halfway to President Trump’s initial request of $30 billion in supplemental military funding."
The Michael Flynn story is not going away for the White House as it tries to refocus its attention. The White House has denied requests from the House Oversight Committee for information and documents regarding payments that the former national security adviser received from Russian state television station RT and Russian firms. House Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz and ranking member Elijah Cummings also said that Flynn failed to report these payments on his security clearance application. White House legislative director Marc Short argued that the documents requested are either not in the possession of the White House or contain sensitive information he believes is not applicable to the committee's stated investigation.