Senators Start Over on Unemployment-Insurance Extension

Because so much time has passed, Congress is unlikely to grant retroactive benefits. Continued House opposition isn’t helping either.

A job seeker fills out an application during a career fair at the Southeast Community Facility Commission on May 21, 2014 in San Francisco, California.
National Journal
Sarah Mimms
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Sarah Mimms
June 4, 2014, 1 a.m.

Sen­ate ne­go­ti­at­ors are back at the draw­ing board in try­ing to re­new emer­gency un­em­ploy­ment-in­sur­ance be­ne­fits for more than 2 mil­lion Amer­ic­ans who have been out of work for at least six months.

Demo­crat­ic Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Is­land and Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Dean Heller of Nevada have re­sumed ne­go­ti­ations to cre­ate new le­gis­la­tion that would ex­tend the be­ne­fits.

The Sen­ate passed a bill in April that would have ex­ten­ded the be­ne­fits through May and provided ret­ro­act­ive checks to those who had stopped re­ceiv­ing pay­ments since the pro­gram ex­pired on Dec. 28. But that le­gis­la­tion ex­pired on May 31 with no ac­tion in the House, put­ting the onus on sen­at­ors who fa­vor the pro­gram to try again.

Reed and Heller have been work­ing to­geth­er on a new solu­tion for at least two weeks and hope to ex­tend the pro­gram through at least the end of this year. While the na­tion­al un­em­ploy­ment rate is drop­ping, Reed said, the long-term un­em­ploy­ment rate is not. “We’re find­ing a lot of people who are mid-ca­reer, have worked for 20 or 30 years, and are just find­ing it very, very hard to get back in. And these be­ne­fits are vi­tal for them,” he said.

But the two sen­at­ors face a num­ber of con­straints that are ham­per­ing their ne­go­ti­ations. Be­cause the be­ne­fits dis­ap­peared more than five months ago and they’ll have to find some way to pay for every penny of the new bill, they warn that grant­ing ret­ro­act­ive be­ne­fits to mil­lions may not be pos­sible this time around.

“That’s hard to do at this point. It will prob­ably be pro­spect­ive,” Heller said. “I’m guess­ing that we just go for­ward at this point. Five months of [ret­ro­act­ive] UI at this point, is a big, big bite of the apple. So that’s not guar­an­teed, but I’m telling you that we real­ize that we are in a bind right now try­ing to make it ret­ro­act­ive.”

An­oth­er con­cern is con­tin­ued op­pos­i­tion from House Speak­er John Boehner, who has said over and over since mid-Decem­ber that the cham­ber will not take up an un­em­ploy­ment-in­sur­ance bill un­less it in­cludes a sep­ar­ate pro­vi­sion that ad­dresses job cre­ation.

Reed said they are not dis­cuss­ing that as an op­tion in the Sen­ate, and he called Boehner hy­po­crit­ic­al after the House passed a tax-ex­tenders bill last month that wasn’t paid for at all. “[I] found it iron­ic that the House could pass an un­fun­ded tax-ex­tenders bill, and yet de­mand that our bill — you know, wasn’t suf­fi­cient even though it was paid for and bi­par­tis­an,” Reed said.

But Heller said that he agreed with Boehner and that the bill should in­clude a jobs pro­vi­sion. The only prob­lem is, it’s not polit­ic­ally pos­sible for him to in­clude one in the Sen­ate pack­age. “If I could, I would,” Heller said.

In­stead, Heller is ur­ging Boehner and oth­er House Re­pub­lic­ans to take up the new Sen­ate bill (as­sum­ing it gets through the up­per cham­ber first) and add their own jobs pro­vi­sion on the back end. Then the two cham­bers can go to con­fer­ence and work out their dif­fer­ences, he said.

For the time be­ing, Heller and Reed ap­pear to be work­ing on their own. Just over a week ago, Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, who was one of the six Re­pub­lic­ans to help push the ori­gin­al un­em­ploy­ment-in­sur­ance ex­ten­sion pack­age through the Sen­ate in April, told Na­tion­al Journ­al that she was not in­volved in the new dis­cus­sions.

Murkowski ex­pressed con­cerns that the Sen­ate was in a po­s­i­tion of “start­ing over” on the le­gis­la­tion and that too much time may have passed to come up with a solu­tion. “Without hav­ing a dir­ect con­ver­sa­tion with the two guys who are try­ing to breathe life in­to it, I can’t say that it’s com­pletely dead. “¦ It’s not look­ing good right now — I guess that’s the best way to sum it up,” she said.

Neither Reed nor Heller could spec­u­late on a time frame for when they might in­tro­duce a new Sen­ate pack­age.

“We’re work­ing on it,” Reed said. “It’s not something we’re ig­nor­ing. “¦ We have to look for a le­gis­lat­ive path. We have to find the right sort of for­mula, lit­er­ally and fig­ur­at­ively. And then we have to make sure that we have the ne­ces­sary bi­par­tis­an sup­port here.”

What We're Following See More »
Twitter Bots Dominated First Debate
35 minutes ago

Twitter bots, "automated social media accounts that interact with other users," accounted for a large part of the online discussion during the first presidential debate. Bots made up 22 percent of conversation about Hillary Clinton on the social media platform, and a whopping one third of Twitter conversation about Donald Trump.

Center for Public Integrity to Spin Off Journalism Arm
39 minutes ago

The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, the nonprofit that published the Panama Papers earlier this year, is being spun off from its parent organization, the Center for Public Integrity. According to a statement, "CPI’s Board of Directors has decided that enabling the ICIJ to chart its own course will help both journalistic teams build on the massive impact they have had as one organization."

EPA Didn’t Warn Flint Residents Soon Enough
1 hours ago

According to a new report, the Environmental Protection Agency waited too long before informing the residents of Flint, Mich. that their water was contaminated with lead. Written by the EPA's inspector general, it places blame squarely at the foot of the agency itself, saying it had enough information by June 2015 to issue an emergency order. However, the order wasn't issued until the end of January 2016.

Trump’s Political Director Steps Down
2 hours ago

Jim Murphy, Donald Trump’s national political director, is taking "a step back" from the campaign, after being absent for several days. He cited "personal reasons," although he added he hasn't resigned.

Trump Draws Laughs, Boos at Al Smith Dinner
12 hours ago

After a lighthearted beginning, Donald Trump's appearance at the Al Smith charity dinner in New York "took a tough turn as the crowd repeatedly booed the GOP nominee for his sharp-edged jokes about his rival Hillary Clinton."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.