Judge Doubts NSA Program Is Constitutional — but Upholds It Anyway

An Idaho federal judge urges the Supreme Court to address the spying controversy.

National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Brendan Sasso
June 3, 2014, 3:44 p.m.

A fed­er­al judge in Idaho up­held the NSA’s con­tro­ver­sial phone sur­veil­lance pro­gram Tues­day.

But Judge B. Lynn Win­mill seemed to in­vite the Su­preme Court to over­turn his de­cision. He sug­ges­ted that the pro­gram, which col­lects data on mil­lions of U.S. phone calls, likely vi­ol­ates the Fourth Amend­ment’s pro­hib­i­tion of un­reas­on­able searches and seizures.

Win­mill up­held the pro­gram be­cause he con­cluded that his hands were tied by cur­rent Su­preme Court pre­ced­ent.

He poin­ted to the Su­preme Court’s 1979 de­cision in Smith v. Mary­land, which held that people don’t ex­pect pri­vacy in the phone num­bers they dial.

The con­tro­ver­sial NSA pro­gram, which was re­vealed by Ed­ward Snowden last year, col­lects “metadata” such as phone num­bers, call times, and call dur­a­tions, but not the con­tents of any con­ver­sa­tions.

Last year, Richard Le­on, a fed­er­al judge in Wash­ing­ton, D.C., ruled that the pro­gram was likely un­con­sti­tu­tion­al. Le­on ar­gued the NSA’s sur­veil­lance is far great­er than what the court en­vi­sioned in Smith v. Mary­land, and that the ubi­quity of cell phones means that metadata is more re­veal­ing than it used to be.

In Tues­day’s de­cision, Win­mill wrote that Le­on craf­ted a “thought­ful and well-writ­ten de­cision.”

“Judge Le­on’s de­cision should serve as a tem­plate for a Su­preme Court opin­ion,” he wrote. “And it might yet.”

But he con­cluded that he is bound to fol­low the Smith rul­ing un­til the Su­preme Court over­turns it. 


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.