Can Your Facebook Profile Help Determine Whether You Get a Mortgage?

It could if your lender is one of a growing number using innovative ways to assess customers’ creditworthiness.

National Journal
Nancy Cook
Add to Briefcase
Nancy Cook
June 4, 2014, 8:08 a.m.

Sci­ent­ists and math­em­aticians comb through roughly 950 dif­fer­ent data points when cal­cu­lat­ing an Amer­ic­an con­sumer’s cred­it score, the all-im­port­ant num­ber that can de­term­ine an in­di­vidu­al’s pur­chas­ing power on everything from an auto loan to a home mort­gage. But only about 15 per­cent of those data points can ac­tu­ally pre­dict the prob­ab­il­ity that a per­son will pay back her debt. The ma­jor cred­it re­port­ing bur­eaus are con­stantly tweak­ing the mix they ex­am­ine to give them­selves the most cur­rent snap­shot of con­sumer spend­ing and debt.

Shift­ing through and mod­el­ing this data is the chief aim of Vant­ageScore, a 10-per­son, Con­necti­c­ut-based star­tup foun­ded in 2006. One of the goals of Vant­ageScore is to eval­u­ate a great­er por­tion of the pop­u­la­tion and, by ex­ten­sion, give more people ac­cess to cred­it. The com­pany es­tim­ates that its latest 3.0 mod­el al­lows it to score at least 27 mil­lion new con­sumers, a group lar­ger than the pop­u­la­tion of Texas. “I look at the cred­it score as a gate­way,” says Bar­rett Burns, pres­id­ent and CEO of Vant­ageScore Solu­tions. “Our main mis­sion is to cre­ate the op­por­tun­ity for people to have ac­cess to re­spons­ible cred­it. Even if a per­son gets a lousy score — if you do not know what your score is, then you do not know how to change your be­ha­vi­or.”

Ac­cess to cred­it now con­sumes much of the dis­cus­sion sur­round­ing the hous­ing mar­ket, which has not re­boun­ded as fast as eco­nom­ists had hoped fol­low­ing the glob­al fin­an­cial re­ces­sion. Scores of first-time home buy­ers, who typ­ic­ally make up about 40 per­cent of home sales, re­main locked out of the mar­ket thanks to more strin­gent lend­ing re­quire­ments. If mort­gage lenders dropped the re­quired cred­it score by just 50 points (on par with prere­ces­sion lend­ing), then 12 mil­lion more people could gain cred­it and po­ten­tially pur­chase homes, ac­cord­ing to a re­cent ana­lys­is by Mark Zandi, chief eco­nom­ist for Moody’s Ana­lyt­ics. “It is dif­fi­cult to see how the eco­nomy can achieve full em­ploy­ment over the next few years un­less hous­ing leads the way,” Zandi wrote in a May re­search note.

Vant­ageScore is not the only com­pany to look for dif­fer­ent ways to eval­u­ate con­sumers’ cred­it­wor­thi­ness. Ex­peri­an, one of the three big cred­it re­port­ing bur­eaus, pur­chased a small com­pany in 2010 to al­low it to track rent­al pay­ments as a way to meas­ure a per­son’s like­li­hood to pay off debt. A hand­ful of fin­an­cial star­tups have also entered the mix; one uses in­form­a­tion from a con­sumer’s so­cial-me­dia feeds, com­bined with private data from the cred­it bur­eaus, to de­term­ine a per­son’s cred­it­wor­thi­ness. With­in the in­dustry, there’s talk of lean­ing on a pay­ment as simple as a cell-phone bill or a per­son’s re­mit­tances to his home coun­try to factor in­to the almighty cal­cu­la­tion of the cred­it score.

The prob­lem with these dif­fer­ent meas­ure­ments? They all look to the past without pre­dict­ing a con­sumer’s abil­ity to pay off debt in the fu­ture, says An­namaria Lusardi, a pro­fess­or at the George Wash­ing­ton Uni­versity School of Busi­ness and per­son­al-fin­ance ex­pert. “We need a way to think about people’s po­ten­tial,” she says. “The prob­lem with hav­ing a stat­ic view is that just be­cause a per­son, as an ex­ample, might be un­em­ployed now does not mean that he will be un­em­ployed in 30 years.”

Far bet­ter, Lusardi says, would be to in­stead ex­am­ine a per­son’s cur­rent level of in­come, or the ra­tio of per­son­al in­come to debt as a way to eval­u­ate a per­son’s cred­it­wor­thi­ness. That’s a strategy that Chi Chi Wu, a staff at­tor­ney at the Na­tion­al Con­sumer Law Cen­ter, also sup­ports. Cred­it scores should also take in­to ac­count the tough eco­nom­ic times in­di­vidu­als may face dur­ing a re­ces­sion, like un­em­ploy­ment or a tem­por­ary in­ab­il­ity to pay one’s bills, Wu says. “Cred­it scores should dis­tin­guish between people who are a hot mess versus those who have just fallen on hard times. Giv­ing them bad cred­it scores just keeps them down,” she adds.

Vant­ageScore does not in­cor­por­ate so­cial me­dia in­to its cred­it-scor­ing mod­els. In­stead, the com­pany leans heav­ily on the fol­low­ing ways to pre­dict someone’s cred­it score: The per­son’s abil­ity to pay bills on time, the his­tory and type of cred­it he uses, and his total cred­it-card bal­ances and total debts. A red flag pops up if someone ac­cu­mu­lates huge amounts of cred­it very fast.

In the latest ver­sion of its mod­el, Vant­ageScore no longer takes in­to con­sid­er­a­tion paid med­ic­al debt or oth­er types of paid debt that get kicked to a col­lec­tion agency. The com­pany no longer finds it “math­em­at­ic­ally sig­ni­fic­ant,” Burns says. Con­sumer ad­voc­ates, like Wu, ap­plaud them for ex­clud­ing this debt that can plague mil­lions of Amer­ic­ans and eas­ily drag down scores. The com­pany has also tried to take in­to ac­count the ef­fect of nat­ur­al dis­asters, like Hur­ricane Sandy, by pulling out the neg­at­ive con­sumer data caused by these pre­dic­a­ments. Burns likes to call these tweaks “nifty dif­fer­en­ti­at­ors.”

Right now, Vant­ageScore sells its cred­it-scor­ing mod­els back to the three ma­jor cred­it-re­port­ing bur­eaus. The long-term goal, however, is for Vant­age Score to be­come its own house­hold name, even if the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment’s ma­jor lenders, like Fan­nie Mae and Fred­die Mac, still do not ac­cept Vant­ageScore as a primary cred­it scorer.

Ad­voc­ates for first-time home­buy­ers and more di­verse pop­u­la­tions hope this will change and that a great­er share of lenders will be open to these dif­fer­ent al­gorithms to pre­dict cred­it scores. “We’re not look­ing for ways to get people in­to the sys­tem that are not qual­i­fied. We’re look­ing for oth­er met­rics to identi­fy people who will be suc­cess­ful,” says Gary Acosta, cofounder and CEO of the Na­tion­al As­so­ci­ation of His­pan­ic Real Es­tate Pro­fes­sion­als. “A large per­cent­age of first-time home­buy­ers or people from the His­pan­ic pop­u­la­tion have thin cred­it or very little tra­di­tion­al cred­it. But they have buy­ing power, job sta­bil­ity, and strong as­sets. The mar­ket­place even­tu­ally will be re­spons­ive.”

Cla­ri­fic­a­tion: This story has been up­dated to make it clear that Vant­ageScore only ex­cludes paid med­ic­al bills and oth­er types of paid col­lec­tion debt from the latest ver­sion of its scor­ing al­gorithm.

What We're Following See More »
Report: U.S. Ill-Equipped to Detect Dirty Bomb
3 hours ago

A DHS report "found gaping holes in domestic nuclear detection and defense capabilities and massive failures during covert testing." A team put in place to assess our readiness capabilities found significant issues in detecting dangerous radioactive and nuclear materials, failing to do so in 30 percent of covert tests conducted over the course of the year. In far too many cases, the person operating the detection device had no idea how to use it. And when the operator did get a hit, he or she relayed sensitive information over unsecured open radio channels."

White House to Give McMaster Carte Blanche
6 hours ago
Trump To Rescind Trans Protections
7 hours ago

Donald Trump is planning to reverse an Obama-era order requiring that schools allow students to use the bathroom that coincides with their gender identity. Trump "has green-lighted the plan for the Justice Department and Education Department to send a “Dear Colleague” letter to schools rescinding the guidance." A case is going before the Supreme Court on March 28 in which Gavin Grimm, a transgender high school student, is suing his high school for forbidding him to use the men's room.

Russia Compiling Dossier on Trump’s Mind
8 hours ago

Retired Russian diplomats and members of Vladimir Putin's staff are compiling a dossier "on Donald Trump's psychological makeup" for the Russian leader. "Among its preliminary conclusions is that the new American leader is a risk-taker who can be naïve, according to a senior Kremlin adviser."

Trump Addresses Threats On Jewish Community Centers
10 hours ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.