How Mary Landrieu’s Escaping Her Democratic Shadow

Senator Mary Landrieu (C), D-LA, speaks during a a press conference on the Keystone XL pipeline in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on February 4, 2014 in Washington, DC. Looking on are (from left): Senator Joe Manchin, D-WV, and Canada's Ambassador to the US Gary Doer. AFP PHOTO/Mandel NGAN (Photo credit should read MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images)
National Journal
Jason Plautz
Add to Briefcase
Jason Plautz
June 10, 2014, 1:20 a.m.

PORT FOURCHON, La. — Mary Landrieu isn’t shy about flex­ing her polit­ic­al muscle, and she loves to do it on be­half of her home state’s oil in­dustry.

That muscle was on full dis­play here last month as the sen­at­or showed off the hub of her home state’s Gulf of Mex­ico drilling activ­ity to no less than En­ergy Sec­ret­ary Ern­est Mon­iz.

“I think he’s been suf­fi­ciently im­pressed with what we have here to of­fer not just the coun­try, but the world,” Landrieu said, call­ing it “thrill­ing” to be able to show off “this ex­traordin­ary little port that’s do­ing it all for Amer­ic­an en­ergy.”

But Landrieu’s ties to the in­dustry go way past vic­tory laps and photo ops. She has had the in­dustry’s back at every con­gres­sion­al turn, even when that meant buck­ing her party — or rip­ping Pres­id­ent Obama. And now, years of de­fend­ing the oil lobby as well as a power­ful perch atop the Sen­ate’s En­ergy pan­el ap­pear to be pay­ing di­vidends in the Demo­crat’s hour of need.

The oil in­dustry would much prefer that Re­pub­lic­ans con­trolled the Sen­ate, and Landrieu los­ing her tough reelec­tion cam­paign would go a long way to­ward mak­ing that hap­pen. But even with the Sen­ate po­ten­tially hanging in the bal­ance, and even after Obama in­furi­ated the in­dustry with new cli­mate rules, the in­dustry is stick­ing with Landrieu.

Landrieu has net­ted more than $547,000 this cycle from the oil and gas lobby in the 2014 cycle, ac­cord­ing to data from the Cen­ter for Re­spons­ive Polit­ics. Between in­di­vidu­al and PAC con­tri­bu­tions, Cali­for­nia-based Sem­pra En­ergy has giv­en her $47,500, while NRG En­ergy has chipped in nearly $46,000. The Amer­ic­an Pet­ro­leum In­sti­tute PAC has even giv­en $6,000, the most for any in­di­vidu­al can­did­ate.

That’s more than double the haul drawn by her chal­lenger, Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Bill Cas­sidy. Cas­sidy has been on the re­ceiv­ing end of $203,000 in in­dustry fund­ing, which in­cludes nearly $18,000 from Mur­ray En­ergy and $10,000 from Koch In­dus­tries.

So how is Landrieu do­ing it?

Landrieu’s rise to the top of the En­ergy and Nat­ur­al Re­sources Com­mit­tee, where she can over­see the in­dustry that drives much of the eco­nomy in her state, has been key. She’s been play­ing up just how im­port­ant that role is; an April cam­paign ad fea­tur­ing nar­ra­tion by ship­build­er Boysie Bollinger states, “Louisi­ana can’t af­ford to lose Mary Landrieu.”

She’s also been a re­li­able op­pon­ent of the White House’s cli­mate agenda: Just Monday, she took to a coal plant in her home state to blast the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s pro­posed emis­sion reg­u­la­tions.

In an email, Sem­pra spokes­man Doug Kline said the com­pany sup­ports “can­did­ates who share our views about ef­fect­ive pub­lic policy and pos­it­ive eco­nom­ic de­vel­op­ment” and that it had a good work­ing re­la­tion­ship with Landrieu.

But the in­dustry sup­port comes as the Landrieu-Cas­sidy race could play a role in the bal­ance of the Sen­ate, a po­ten­tially big­ger prize in the en­ergy world. Re­pub­lic­ans have vowed to make en­ergy a pri­or­ity if they re­take the Sen­ate, an agenda sure to in­clude bills that would re­strict or kill En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency reg­u­la­tions. In an in­ter­view on C-SPAN’s News­makers last week­end, Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­an Policy Com­mit­tee Chair­man John Bar­rasso said is­sues like the Key­stone XL pipeline and nat­ur­al-gas ex­ports offered a “huge op­por­tun­ity” for a Re­pub­lic­an Sen­ate.

And while Demo­crats haven’t done much to pro­mote the en­vir­on­ment with their ma­jor­ity, they have beaten back ef­forts they say would harm the cli­mate. That in­cluded a Landrieu-led ef­fort to get a vote ap­prov­ing Key­stone, a fail­ure she blamed on Re­pub­lic­ans.

But op­pon­ents are point­ing out that those fail­ures weak­en her mes­sage of polit­ic­al clout and it’s led her to lose a po­ten­tially power­ful ally at home. Don Briggs, the head of the Louisi­ana Oil and Gas As­so­ci­ation, is back­ing Cas­sidy in what is es­sen­tially a proxy vote against Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id.

“I know Mary very well and I’ve al­ways sup­por­ted her per­son­ally,” said Briggs, who is en­dors­ing Cas­sidy per­son­ally and not on be­half of the trade group. “But chan­ging the Sen­ate to me is the big pic­ture. The [En­ergy chair­man­ship] isn’t very valu­able if you can’t do any­thing with it.”

On en­ergy is­sues, there’s ul­ti­mately not a big gulf between Cas­sidy and Landrieu. Roy Fletch­er, a Re­pub­lic­an strategist in Louisi­ana, said that en­ergy wouldn’t serve as a wedge between the two can­did­ates, but rather would al­low Landrieu to sep­ar­ate her­self more from the White House.

“It’s an is­sue that Landrieu uses as a way to say that she’s not Obama,” said Fletch­er, who is not af­fil­i­ated with the Cas­sidy cam­paign. “Fun­da­ment­ally that’s what this race is about any­ways.”

On the flip side, even en­vir­on­ment­al­ists who would stand to lose if Re­pub­lic­ans took con­trol haven’t been do­ing much to keep Landrieu in. Un­like the races de­fend­ing, say, Kay Hagan in North Car­o­lina or Tom Ud­all in Col­or­ado, green groups have largely stayed out of Louisi­ana. She hasn’t garnered en­dorse­ments from the groups and has only pulled in $2,500 from the En­vir­on­ment­al De­fense Ac­tion Fund PAC, which is sup­port­ing her work on coastal res­tor­a­tion.

“Our the­ory of change is that we need an en­vir­on­ment­al ma­jor­ity,” said Heath­er Taylor-Miesle, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the NRDC Ac­tion Fund. “I don’t see a world we we get in­to that race. It’s not one that we pri­or­it­ize. I re­spect people who say that we have to keep the Sen­ate at all costs and there’s no ques­tion that Harry Re­id is a bet­ter lead­er on en­vir­on­ment­al is­sues than Mitch Mc­Con­nell, but we have to make choices of who we’re go­ing to pri­or­it­ize.”

It’s easy to point fin­gers on a na­tion­al level, but that doesn’t do much for the en­vir­on­ment­al­ists in the state who ac­tu­ally have to pull a lever for someone. They’re faced with the real­ity of hav­ing to hold their nose and vote for a can­did­ate they may not like to pro­tect what they see as the great­er good.

“We don’t have a lot of choice,” said Darryl Malek-Wiley of the Si­erra Club’s New Or­leans chapter. “The Sen­ate race, that’s just tied up in na­tion­al polit­ics. We’re not go­ing to en­dorse any can­did­ate in that race, but I don’t want Re­pub­lic­ans con­trolling the Sen­ate. That’s my per­son­al opin­ion.”

What We're Following See More »
Colin Powell to Vote for Clinton
2 hours ago
Cook Report: Dems to Pick up 5-7 Seats, Retake Senate
4 hours ago

Since the release of the Access Hollywood tape, on which Donald Trump boasted of sexually assaulting women, "Senate Republicans have seen their fortunes dip, particularly in states like Florida, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Nevada and Pennsylvania," where Hillary Clinton now leads. Jennifer Duffy writes that she now expects Democrats to gain five to seven seats—enough to regain control of the chamber.

"Of the Senate seats in the Toss Up column, Trump only leads in Indiana and Missouri where both Republicans are running a few points behind him. ... History shows that races in the Toss Up column never split down the middle; one party tends to win the lion’s share of them."

Tying Republicans to Trump Now an Actionable Offense
6 hours ago

"Some Republicans are running so far away from their party’s nominee that they are threatening to sue TV stations for running ads that suggest they support Donald Trump. Just two weeks before Election Day, five Republicans―Reps. Bob Dold (R-Ill.), Mike Coffman (R-Colo.), David Jolly (R-Fla.), John Katko (R-N.Y.) and Brian Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican running for an open seat that’s currently occupied by his brother―contend that certain commercials paid for by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee provide false or misleading information by connecting them to the GOP nominee. Trump is so terrible, these Republicans are essentially arguing, that tying them to him amounts to defamation."

Former Congressman Schock Fined $10,000
6 hours ago

Former Illinois GOP Congressman Aaron Schock "recently agreed to pay a $10,000 fine for making an excessive solicitation for a super PAC that was active in his home state of Illinois four years ago." Schock resigned from Congress after a story about his Downton Abbey-themed congressional office raised questions about how he was using taxpayer dollars.

Clinton Reaching Out to GOP Senators
7 hours ago

If you need a marker for how confident Hillary Clinton is at this point of the race, here's one: CNN's Jeff Zeleny reports "she's been talking to Republican senators, old allies and new, saying that she is willing to work with them and govern."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.