Prosecuting VA Officials Would Be ‘Shot Heard Around the System’

Sixty-nine VA facilities — not including Phoenix — are under investigation by the VA’s inspector general’s office.

PHOENIX, AZ - MAY 08: Exterior view of the Veterans Affairs Medical Center on May 8, 2014 in Phoenix, Arizona. The Department of Veteran Affairs has come under fire after reports of the deaths of 40 patients forced to wait for medical care at the Phoenix VA hopsital.
National Journal
Jordain Carney
Add to Briefcase
Jordain Carney
June 10, 2014, 1:28 a.m.

Want to get the at­ten­tion of staffers at the Vet­er­ans Af­fairs De­part­ment dur­ing the ever-grow­ing health care scan­dal? Fire a few top of­fi­cials or charge them for their crimes as a warn­ing to oth­ers.

That was a solu­tion offered by law­makers from both parties on Monday at a hear­ing on Cap­it­ol Hill, where a push to pun­ish VA of­fi­cials was seen as a way to stop the crisis from get­ting worse.

“I think a few high-pro­file pro­sec­u­tions would clean things rather dra­mat­ic­ally,” Demo­crat­ic Rep. Ann McLane Kuster of New Hamp­shire said at a House Vet­er­ans’ Af­fairs Com­mit­tee hear­ing Monday even­ing.

It re­mains to be seen wheth­er the Justice De­part­ment thinks that al­leg­a­tions of al­ter­ing the wait times for vet­er­ans to re­ceive care rises to the level of a crim­in­al pro­sec­u­tion. But Richard Griffin, the act­ing VA’s in­spect­or gen­er­al, said Monday that fir­ing or pro­sec­ut­ing someone for al­ter­ing a vet­er­an’s re­cords, or chan­ging a timeline to help meet a per­form­ance meas­ure, would be the “shot heard around the sys­tem.”

The hear­ing comes as an in­tern­al audit re­leased by the VA on Monday found that ap­prox­im­ately 57,000 vet­er­ans had been wait­ing 90 days or more for an ap­point­ment, and that more than 63,000 vet­er­ans en­rolled in VA care but nev­er had an ap­point­ment.

Griffin ad­ded that in­vest­ig­at­ors have been sent to 69 fa­cil­it­ies — not in­clud­ing Phoenix — to in­vest­ig­ate al­leg­a­tions, in­clud­ing those of crim­in­al wrong­do­ing. But he stressed that they are cur­rently just al­leg­a­tions.

“… You have to work your way back up the su­per­vis­ory chain to de­term­ine who put the or­der out,” Griffin said. “It’s not an easy task. I sus­pect that if people do start get­ting charged, that middle per­son will say, ‘Wait a minute, I’m not go­ing to take the fall here for some­body high­er up than me.’ “

The scan­dal has kick-star­ted a slew of le­gis­la­tion. The House passed a bill Monday ur­ging VA of­fi­cials to act swiftly on an re­forms re­com­men­ded by the in­spect­or gen­er­al.

That’s in ad­di­tion to a bill the House passed last month that would make it easi­er for Act­ing Sec­ret­ary Sloan Gib­son to fire seni­or VA of­fi­cials. On the op­pos­ite side of the Hill, Sen­ate Vet­er­ans’ Af­fairs Com­mit­tee Chair­man Bernie Sanders in­tro­duced le­gis­la­tion Monday with Re­pub­lic­an Sen. John Mc­Cain. Among oth­er things, the bi­par­tis­an duo’s pro­pos­al would al­low the VA to boost its hir­ing, in­crease vet­er­ans ac­cess to non-VA health care, and — un­like the House bil — give em­ploy­ees a week to ap­peal a fir­ing.

Monday’s hear­ing largely marked a shift in tone from the com­mit­tee’s fre­quently com­bat­ive hear­ing last week, with law­makers even thank­ing VA of­fi­cials for their candor on the scope of the VA’s prob­lems.

Philip Matkovsky, as­sist­ant deputy un­der­sec­ret­ary for health for ad­min­is­trat­ive op­er­a­tions, said the wait times re­por­ted by the VA could ac­tu­ally get worse as Con­gress con­tin­ues its probe, be­cause the as­sess­ments “would be rooted in real­ity.”

But law­makers still fo­cused in on a slew of VA prob­lems, in­clud­ing out­dated tech­no­logy that de­part­ment of­fi­cials say goes back 20 to 30 years, and a lack of con­gres­sion­al over­sight. And law­makers, like most Amer­ic­ans ac­cord­ing to a re­cent poll, re­mained skep­tic­al of the VA.

“There is no ac­count­ab­il­ity here, there is com­pla­cency here.”¦ People need to get fired, we need to make that hap­pen,” Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Dan Ben­ishek of Michigan said.

What We're Following See More »
STARTS LEGAL FUND FOR WH STAFF
Trump to Begin Covering His Own Legal Bills
14 hours ago
THE DETAILS
DISCUSSED THE MATTER FOR A NEW BOOK
Steele Says Follow the Money
15 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

"Christopher Steele, the former British intelligence officer who wrote the explosive dossier alleging ties between Donald Trump and Russia," says in a new book by The Guardian's Luke Harding that "Trump's land and hotel deals with Russians needed to be examined. ... Steele did not go into further detail, Harding said, but seemed to be referring to a 2008 home sale to the Russian oligarch Dmitry Rybolovlev. Richard Dearlove, who headed the UK foreign-intelligence unit MI6 between 1999 and 2004, said in April that Trump borrowed money from Russia for his business during the 2008 financial crisis."

Source:
BRITISH PUBLICIST CONNECTED TO TRUMP TOWER MEETING
Goldstone Ready to Meet with Mueller’s Team
16 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The British publicist who helped set up the fateful meeting between Donald Trump Jr. and a group of Russians at Trump Tower in June 2016 is ready to meet with Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller's office, according to several people familiar with the matter. Rob Goldstone has been living in Bangkok, Thailand, but has been communicating with Mueller's office through his lawyer, said a source close to Goldstone."

Source:
SPEAKING ON RUSSIAN STATE TV
Kislyak Says Trump Campaign Contacts Too Numerous to List
16 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak said on Wednesday that it would take him more than 20 minutes to name all of the Trump officials he's met with or spoken to on the phone. ... Kislyak made the remarks in a sprawling interview with Russia-1, a popular state-owned Russian television channel."

Source:
“BLOWING A SURE THING”
Sabato Moves Alabama to “Lean Democrat”
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login