Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz: Careful Critics of Obama’s Bergdahl Swap

The 2016 contenders won’t box themselves in on the president’s use of the controversial “signing statement.”

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 16: U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) speaks after meeting with Republican senators regarding a bipartisan solution for the pending budget and debt limit impasse at the U.S. Capitol October 16, 2013 in Washington, DC. The Senate announced that it had reached a bipartisan deal on funding the federal government and the extending the nation's debt limit after 16 days of a government shutdown.
National Journal
Clara Ritger
Add to Briefcase
Clara Ritger
June 10, 2014, 2:53 p.m.

Re­pub­lic­ans are out­raged that Pres­id­ent Obama ig­nored U.S. law and re­leased Taliban sus­pects from Guantanamo without first no­ti­fy­ing Con­gress. This, even as the “sign­ing state­ment” that Obama at­tached to the law fore­told his in­ten­tion.

But guess whose pique is a little more nu­anced.

“There have been mul­tiple pres­id­ents who have used sign­ing state­ments for dif­fer­ent pur­poses, so it is wrong to speak of sign­ing state­ments in blanket terms,” said Sen. Ted Cruz as a pre­amble to his ro­bust cri­ti­cism of the pres­id­ent’s de­cision to swap Taliban sus­pects for Amer­ic­an pris­on­er of war Bowe Ber­g­dahl.

An­oth­er lead­ing 2016 pres­id­en­tial hope­ful, Marco Ru­bio, offered a bit of the same. He dodged the ques­tion of the sign­ing state­ment al­to­geth­er, im­ply­ing that pres­id­ents do in­deed have the au­thor­ity to do what’s ne­ces­sary to en­sure U.S. se­cur­ity.

“Most of these laws have a na­tion­al se­cur­ity waiver built in­to them,” he said. “The more im­port­ant is­sue here is not wheth­er Con­gress re­ceived a heads-up. The most im­port­ant is­sue is that five ex­tremely dan­ger­ous anti-Amer­ic­an ter­ror­ists have been re­leased, and I think a pre­ced­ent has been set.”

Many pres­id­ents have at­tached sign­ing state­ments to le­gis­la­tion, but their use as tools by the ex­ec­ut­ive branch to shape laws star­ted un­der the Re­agan ad­min­is­tra­tion, when then-law­yer, now-Su­preme Court Justice Samuel Alito is­sued a memo en­cour­aging the ex­pan­sion of ex­ec­ut­ive power through such state­ments.

Pres­id­ent George W. Bush is­sued more than 150 sign­ing state­ments that de­clared how he in­ten­ded to en­force the law, and he claimed con­sti­tu­tion­al au­thor­ity to make changes or dis­reg­ard parts of the law if ne­ces­sary, a con­tro­ver­sial prac­tice that promp­ted the Amer­ic­an Bar As­so­ci­ation to study its con­sti­tu­tion­al­ity and ul­ti­mately is­sue re­com­mend­a­tions against it.

Obama said dur­ing his first cam­paign for the White House that he would not use state­ments to nul­li­fy con­gres­sion­al in­struc­tions, and while he has is­sued re­l­at­ively few sign­ing state­ments com­pared with his pre­de­cessor, the one he is us­ing now to de­fend the Ber­g­dahl swap ap­pears to vi­ol­ate that cam­paign prom­ise.

There’s one Re­pub­lic­an on the 2016 lead­er board who hasn’t shied away from dir­ectly ad­dress­ing the use of sign­ing state­ments. That’s Rand Paul, of­ten the most vo­ci­fer­ous crit­ic of not only Obama but the ex­pan­sion of ex­ec­ut­ive power.

“I ob­jec­ted to Bush’s sign­ing state­ments, I ob­jec­ted to this pres­id­ent’s sign­ing state­ments,” he told Na­tion­al Journ­al. “That would be akin to the pres­id­ent le­gis­lat­ing. It’s un­equi­voc­ally un­con­sti­tu­tion­al.”

Elahe Izad contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
13 hours ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
16 hours ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
18 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
2 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login