The Federal Communications Commission may nullify a Tennessee law that restricts the abilities of cities to build their own high-speed Internet networks.
Chattanooga, Tenn., has built a municipal broadband network to consumers’ homes, but a state law is preventing the city government from expanding the service to more residents.
In a blog post Tuesday, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler said broadband projects like the one in Chattanooga are bringing new competition and spurring economic growth. He argued that local governments “shouldn’t be stopped by state laws promoted by cable and telephone companies that don’t want that competition.”
“I believe that it is in the best interests of consumers and competition that the FCC exercises its power to preempt state laws that ban or restrict competition from community broadband,” he said. “Given the opportunity, we will do so.”
But the move could face resistance from Republican lawmakers. Eleven GOP senators sent a letter to Wheeler last week, warning him not to “usurp” state power.
The senators, led by Deb Fischer of Nebraska and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, said it is “deeply troubling” that the FCC may “force taxpayer funded competition against broadband providers — against the wishes of states.”
If the FCC tries to strike down a state law, it would likely point to Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act, which gives the agency the authority to promote the deployment of broadband. State laws that restrict municipal broadband could be in violation of that provision, according to the FCC.
Harold Feld, the senior vice president of consumer advocacy group Public Knowledge, said Wheeler will probably not launch a broad initiative to attack state laws around the country. Instead, the FCC chief will probably wait for groups or individuals to file complaints about specific state laws, Feld predicted.
The blog post appears to be an “invitation” for challenges to the Tennessee law, Feld said.
He argued that cities should be allowed to build broadband networks to fuel economic development, just like they’re allowed to build sports stadiums.
“We need broadband. We need competition,” Feld said. “The fact is that local governments ought to have the flexibility to decide the services they need.”
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."