On Veterans Affairs Fix, a Rare United Front for House and Senate

Both chambers are voting on different bills this week, but members believe they can reach an agreement for a fast, bipartisan victory.

Senate Majority Leader Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) listens during an event on Capitol Hill April 3, 2014 in Washington, DC. 
National Journal
Sarah Mimms
Add to Briefcase
Sarah Mimms
June 11, 2014, 1 a.m.

More than a month after the scan­dal at the Vet­er­ans Af­fairs De­part­ment broke, the House and Sen­ate seem to be mov­ing in dif­fer­ent dir­ec­tions to solve it, each bring­ing up its own pieces of le­gis­la­tion this week.

But those dif­fer­ences are small and will be re­solved without much delay, both sides say, hint­ing at the po­ten­tial for a quick, bi­par­tis­an solu­tion to a ma­jor na­tion­al prob­lem — something rarely seen in re­cent Con­gresses.

The House on Tues­day passed its third bill aimed at fix­ing prob­lems at the VA in as many weeks. The most re­cent meas­ure, and most com­pre­hens­ive bill so far, was sponsored by House Vet­er­ans’ Af­fairs Com­mit­tee Chair­man Jeff Miller of Flor­ida and passed 426-0, al­beit after a minor vot­ing mis­hap.

Mean­while, the Sen­ate is fo­cused on bring­ing up its own le­gis­la­tion, pro­posed by Sen­ate Vet­er­ans’ Af­fairs Com­mit­tee Chair­man Bernie Sanders, that rep­res­ents a com­prom­ise with Sen. John Mc­Cain and oth­er Re­pub­lic­an mem­bers. That vote, Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id said Tues­day, will likely come on Wed­nes­day or Thursday.

In an un­usu­al move, Re­id has said that he is open to look­ing at amend­ments — even from Re­pub­lic­ans — that are ger­mane to the le­gis­la­tion. That might not sound like much of a con­ces­sion, but giv­en that Re­id has blocked Re­pub­lic­an amend­ments more than twice as of­ten as every pre­vi­ous ma­jor­ity lead­er com­bined, it cer­tainly rep­res­ents a sig­ni­fic­ant shift.

The change in tone from the Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er’s of­fice is due to the sig­ni­fic­ance of the is­sue. Where­as with oth­er le­gis­la­tion, mem­bers of the minor­ity have tried to at­tach amend­ments that would ef­fect­ively kill the un­der­ly­ing bill, no one is talk­ing about do­ing that with the VA fix, at least at the mo­ment. And it wouldn’t be polit­ic­ally wise to do any­thing that would stand in the way of a solu­tion. The Sen­ate, like the House, is ex­pec­ted to pass its VA bill with ease this week.

Not all is com­pletely re­con­ciled between the cham­bers, however. Lead­ers, in­clud­ing Sanders and Miller, also said Tues­day that they had not read the oth­er cham­ber’s le­gis­la­tion. Spokes­men for Re­id and House Speak­er John Boehner de­clined to say wheth­er they would bring the oth­er cham­ber’s bill to the floor or com­ment on it un­til the oth­er cham­ber passes it.

And there are dif­fer­ences between the bills. The House le­gis­la­tion would al­low vet­er­ans to vis­it a non-VA fa­cil­ity if they are on a wait-list for more than 30 days, while the Sen­ate bill would not. Both meas­ures do al­low vet­er­ans to go out­side the sys­tem for care if they live more than 40 miles from a VA fa­cil­ity. The Sen­ate bill also provides mil­lions of dol­lars in new fund­ing to build ad­di­tion­al VA hos­pit­als and hire more doc­tors that is not in­cluded in the House pro­vi­sion. And the House le­gis­la­tion calls for an in­de­pend­ent in­vest­ig­a­tion in­to is­sues at the VA.

But these is­sues won’t hold up a le­gis­lat­ive fix for long, mem­bers on both sides say. Lead­ers in both cham­bers ex­pect to re­con­cile the bills quickly and send them to Pres­id­ent Obama’s desk.

On the Sen­ate side, mem­bers and aides in­volved in the is­sue feel that the bills are in the “same ball­park,” a spokes­man for Re­id (a base­ball fan) said Tues­day.

Miller, who hadn’t seen the Sen­ate bill but was in­volved in the ne­go­ti­ations on that side of the Cap­it­ol dur­ing last week’s House re­cess, was sim­il­arly op­tim­ist­ic. “I think the House is will­ing to look at any­thing that the Sen­ate brings for­ward. That’s the way the pro­cess is sup­posed to work around here. Both Houses, you know, come for­ward with the le­gis­la­tion that they think would solve the is­sue. Then it’s im­port­ant for us to come for­ward and re­con­cile as quickly as we can,” he said Monday.

What We're Following See More »
BIPARTISAN SUPPORT YIELDS 87 VOTES IN FAVOR
Senate OKs Perdue as Agriculture Secretary
37 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

It took long enough, but the Trump administration finally includes an Agriculture secretary. "The Senate easily approved Sonny Perdue on Monday" by a count of 87-11. Perdue enjoyed the support of Democrats like Delaware's Chris Coons and Wisconsin's Tammy Baldwin, both of whom spoke in his favor.

Source:
ANOTHER ETHICAL THICKET
State Department Highlights Mar-a-Lago in Advertisement
37 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

"A media arm of the State Department is using federal resources to promote President Donald Trump’s private Florida golf club, fueling scrutiny of the nexus between the president’s official duties and his personal financial interests." On April 4, "Share America, the State Department’s social media-friendly news website, paid homage to Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club ... hailing the president’s use of 'the winter White House, as Share America dubbed it, to host world leaders."

Source:
NOT WORRIED ABOUT BUDGET NEUTRALITY
Trump Wants to Slash Corporate Rate to 15%
17 hours ago
THE LATEST
PROMISES “MASSIVE” CUTS
Trump Tax Reform Package Coming Next Week
17 hours ago
THE LATEST

President Trump today said he'll be releasing his tax reformpacakge next week around the 100-day mark of his presidency. He promised that "businesses and individuals will receive a 'massive tax cut ... bigger I believe than any tax cut ever."

Source:
ONLY BROAD PRINCIPLES
Mulvaney: Tax Reform Details Won’t Be Released This Week
17 hours ago
THE LATEST

Despite President Trump's announcement that his tax reform proposal would be released this week, Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney now says it will be ready in June. This week's announcement will be limited to "specific governing principles."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login