Eric Cantor Falls to Shock Defeat in Primary

A little-known economics professor who campaigned against immigration reform defeated the House majority leader in his Republican primary Tuesday.

Cantor: Comes out swinging.
National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Alex Roarty and Jack Fitzpatrick
June 10, 2014, 4:04 p.m.

In one of the biggest polit­ic­al up­sets in re­cent memory, House Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor lost his primary elec­tion on Tues­day to a polit­ic­al un­known who fo­cused his cam­paign on Can­tor’s sup­port for a path to cit­izen­ship for the chil­dren of im­mig­rants.

Ran­dolph-Ma­con Col­lege eco­nom­ics pro­fess­or Dave Brat won the Re­pub­lic­an primary in Vir­gin­ia’s 7th Con­gres­sion­al Dis­trict. Brat had 56 per­cent of the vote to Can­tor’s 44 per­cent when the As­so­ci­ated Press called the race just after 8 p.m. 

Can­tor’s de­feat will send shock waves throughout Wash­ing­ton. The House ma­jor­ity lead­er was one of the best-known Re­pub­lic­an fig­ures in the coun­try, re­puted for his stra­tegic acu­men and polit­ic­al am­bi­tion. He wiel­ded an im­mense amount of clout with­in the Cap­it­ol and was widely ex­pec­ted to one day seek to be­come the speak­er of the House.

His primary was nev­er ex­pec­ted to be ser­i­ously com­pet­it­ive, and his loss is catch­ing every­one — from vet­er­ans of Vir­gin­ia polit­ics to long­time ana­lysts in Wash­ing­ton — by sur­prise.

“Ob­vi­ously, we came up short,” Can­tor said in a speech Tues­day night.

Can­tor’s loss was shock­ing, but there were sev­er­al signs of rising voter dis­con­tent among con­ser­vat­ives in his dis­trict. Brat at­tacked him for sup­port­ing “am­nesty” as part of his sup­port for com­pre­hens­ive im­mig­ra­tion re­form, which forced Can­tor to re­it­er­ate that he op­posed le­gis­la­tion that provided for “blanket am­nesty.”

The is­sue of im­mig­ra­tion policy drew heightened at­ten­tion on Fox News and con­ser­vat­ive talk ra­dio in the past week after news re­ports doc­u­mented a surge of un­doc­u­mented chil­dren ar­riv­ing at the United States bor­der, over­run­ning pro­cessing cen­ters and the Bor­der Patrol.

In an in­ter­view just last Fri­day, Can­tor sug­ges­ted he could work with Pres­id­ent Obama to al­low a path to cit­izen­ship for some chil­dren of il­leg­al im­mig­rants already in the coun­try. In the cam­paign’s fi­nal days, Brat cri­ti­cized Can­tor for sid­ing with Obama on the con­ten­tious is­sue.

A sec­ond­ary factor in Can­tor’s de­mise was his dis­con­nect from many Re­pub­lic­an con­stitu­ents in the dis­trict. The state’s re­dis­trict­ing in 2010 made his sub­urb­an Rich­mond dis­trict more con­ser­vat­ive, adding new areas that he didn’t pre­vi­ously rep­res­ent. As ma­jor­ity lead­er, Can­tor spent less time woo­ing voters at town halls in Chester­field County and more time deal-mak­ing with Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship in Wash­ing­ton.

“Eric Can­tor and I have been through a lot to­geth­er,” House Speak­er John Boehner said in a state­ment late Tues­day night. “He’s a good friend and a great lead­er, and someone I’ve come to rely upon on a daily basis as we make the tough choices that come with gov­ern­ing. My thoughts are with him and Di­ana and their kids to­night.”

Can­tor didn’t take the chal­lenge from Brat ser­i­ously enough un­til it was too late. Between April 1 and May 21, he spent nearly $1 mil­lion try­ing to fend off Brat, but his cam­paign was still dis­missive of the chal­lenge even as re­cently as Monday when re­port­ers ques­tioned why it was spend­ing so much money.

“We lived the ex­act same thing two years ago,” said Ray Al­len, Can­tor’s cam­paign man­ager, in an in­ter­view with the Na­tion­al Journ­al be­fore Tues­day’s primary. “From 2000 to 2012, we’ve run TV ads, done dir­ect mail, yard signs.”

Can­tor won his primary with 79 per­cent of the vote last year, though he only won less than 60 per­cent of the vote in the last two gen­er­al elec­tions — in a Re­pub­lic­an-friendly dis­trict.

Can­tor’s loss is also a ma­jor de­feat for the faint hopes of passing im­mig­ra­tion re­form in the House. Brat’s fo­cus on Can­tor’s im­mig­ra­tion re­cord forced him to be de­fens­ive. Can­tor sent mail ads tout­ing his op­pos­i­tion to “am­nesty for il­leg­al im­mig­rants” even while ad­voc­at­ing for an ex­cep­tion for those brought to the coun­try as chil­dren — a caveat Brat cri­ti­cized.

Can­tor also ran neg­at­ive TV ads call­ing Brat a “lib­er­al col­lege pro­fess­or” and cri­ti­ciz­ing him for serving on an ad­vis­ory board for Demo­crat­ic Sen. Tim Kaine when Kaine was gov­ernor.

Can­tor’s loss also likely will leave the House Re­pub­lic­an caucus without any Jew­ish mem­bers next year, a fact that is par­tic­u­larly pain­ful for some Re­pub­lic­ans. “On a per­son­al level, it’s a mo­ment of sad­ness to lose someone who was spe­cial and unique,” says former White House Press Sec­ret­ary Ari Fleis­cher. “Who was proudly Jew­ish and a proudly Jew­ish Re­pub­lic­an. Eric’s loss will be felt,” Fleis­cher said.

There isn’t much his­tor­ic­al pre­ced­ent for a ma­jor­ity lead­er los­ing a primary. In 1994, Tom Fo­ley be­came the first House speak­er in more than a cen­tury to be de­feated for reelec­tion when he lost a gen­er­al elec­tion dur­ing that year’s Re­pub­lic­an wave. His pre­de­cessor was Speak­er Galusha Grow, a Re­pub­lic­an who lost his seat dur­ing the Civil War. In the up­per cham­ber, one­time Sen­ate Minor­ity Lead­er Tom Daschle is the only party lead­er in re­cent his­tory to lose an elec­tion, in 2004.

The loss to lead­er­ship speaks to a broad­er de­feat for the Re­pub­lic­an es­tab­lish­ment. “Those who thought the tea party had been ab­sorbed just got a big wake up call,” says Re­pub­lic­an strategist Alex Cas­tel­lanos. “It’s alive and well and eat­ing elite es­tab­lish­ment Re­pub­lic­ans for break­fast.”

Both Brat and Demo­crat­ic can­did­ate Jack Tram­mell are pro­fess­ors at the same small school, Ran­dolph-Ma­con Col­lege in Ash­land, Va. The school has few­er than 100 full-time fac­ulty and a stu­dent pop­u­la­tion of just over 1,200.

In a state­ment from the Vir­gin­ia Demo­crat­ic Party Tues­day night, Tram­mell said that “Vir­gini­ans are hungry for a rad­ic­al change from the dys­func­tion­al and reck­less polit­ics be­ing prac­ticed by those in Con­gress ““ and the res­ults of to­night’s primary elec­tion are the proof.”

Tram­mell wasn’t the only Demo­crat to put out a state­ment after Can­tor’s loss. “The Amer­ic­an people should take no­tice,” House Minor­ity Lead­er Nancy Pelosi said in a late night state­ment. “To­night, the Tea Party de­feated Re­pub­lic­an Lead­er Eric Can­tor who is one of the most ex­treme Mem­bers of Con­gress…To­night, is a ma­jor vic­tory for the Tea Party as they yet again pull the Re­pub­lic­an Party fur­ther to the rad­ic­al right.”

“As far as the midterms elec­tions are con­cerned,” she con­tin­ued, “it’s a whole new ballgame.”

Vir­gin­ia law pro­hib­its Can­tor from run­ning as an in­de­pend­ent, but he can run as a write-in can­did­ate, a strategy that worked for Sen. Lisa Murkowski in 2010 after she lost the Alaska Re­pub­lic­an primary.

And it’s not like Can­tor’s sound­ing like he’s now ready to just dis­ap­pear.

“I be­lieve there’s op­por­tun­ity around the next corner for all of us,” he said Tues­day night. “So I look for­ward to con­tinu­ing to fight with all of you for the things that we be­lieve in for the con­ser­vat­ive cause, be­cause those solu­tions of ours are the an­swer to the prob­lems that so many people are fa­cing today.”

Contributions by Alex Seitz-WaldMatt Berman and Josh Kraushaar

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.