Eric Cantor Loss Could Spark Revolution in House GOP

Conservatives wanted to shake up leadership. Now they have a bigger opportunity than they thought.

Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) (C) and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) (R) attend a press conference with Rep. Cath McMorris Rodgers (R-OR) April 28, 2014 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Tim Alberta
June 10, 2014, 6:41 p.m.

Eric Can­tor is gone, and if they’re not care­ful, John Boehner and Kev­in Mc­Carthy could be next.

The earth-shat­ter­ing up­set in Vir­gin­ia’s 7th Dis­trict Tues­day night means that Can­tor, the House ma­jor­ity lead­er who has long been con­sidered the heir-ap­par­ent to Boehner as speak­er, won’t be back in the next Con­gress.

And his loss is a sig­ni­fic­ant vic­tory for a grow­ing group of frus­trated House Re­pub­lic­ans who have been plot­ting to shake up the GOP lead­er­ship struc­ture ahead of the 114th Con­gress. Those plans have centered on eject­ing Boehner from the speak­er­ship and then hop­ing for a con­sensus can­did­ate to emerge who could either chal­lenge Can­tor for the top job, or at least slide in be­hind him as ma­jor­ity lead­er.

But Tues­day night’s shock­er turns those plans up­side down. Can­tor’s loss not only means there will be a va­cant spot in lead­er­ship, it also in­vites more dra­mat­ic ac­tion from that clutch of con­ser­vat­ives who have grown in­creas­ingly dis­en­chanted with a lead­er­ship team that they view as out of touch — demo­graph­ic­ally, ideo­lo­gic­ally, and stra­tegic­ally — with the mem­ber­ship of the House Re­pub­lic­an Con­fer­ence.

Those con­ser­vat­ives, sud­denly smelling blood in the wa­ter, might now be em­boldened to push for a whole­sale change in lead­er­ship — oust­ing Boehner and Mc­Carthy in this Novem­ber’s con­fer­ence elec­tions, and en­ter­ing the next Con­gress with a new top three.

“It should fright­en every­one in lead­er­ship,” one con­ser­vat­ive House Re­pub­lic­an, who ex­changed text mes­sages on con­di­tion of an­onym­ity, said shortly after Can­tor’s de­feat was of­fi­cial. “They haven’t been con­ser­vat­ive enough. We’ve told them that for 3 years. They wouldn’t listen.”

The GOP law­maker ad­ded: “Maybe they will listen now.”

In­deed, if Can­tor’s de­feat of­fers a sil­ver lin­ing for Boehner and Mc­Carthy, it’s that they now have a five-month au­di­tion to con­vince those con­ser­vat­ive mem­bers that they won’t be ig­nored any longer. Boehner’s fate may already be sealed, as earli­er this year Na­tion­al Journ­al re­por­ted that between 40 and 50 mem­bers have verbally com­mit­ted to elect­ing a new speak­er. But Mc­Carthy, who is per­haps the most per­son­ally pop­u­lar mem­ber of the lead­er­ship team, may have an out­side shot of re­tain­ing his job as ma­jor­ity whip. (He may not want it now that Can­tor, his best friend in Con­gress, has been fired.)

Asked wheth­er Can­tor’s de­feat means he and his fel­low con­ser­vat­ives will at­tempt to clean house and bring in an en­tirely new lead­er­ship team, the House Re­pub­lic­an answered: “Not ne­ces­sar­ily. The policies are what count. Not the people.”

It’s a nice sen­ti­ment, but Wash­ing­ton is driv­en by re­la­tion­ships, and the group of young con­ser­vat­ives whose en­ergy has dic­tated the mood with­in the House GOP since 2010 is likely to de­term­ine who holds the key lead­er­ship posts in 2015. The most ubi­quit­ous name is that of Jeb Hensarling, the Tex­an and Fin­an­cial Ser­vices chair­man whom con­ser­vat­ives have spent the past sev­er­al months try­ing to con­vince to chal­lenge either Boehner or Can­tor. Hensarling has denied in­terest in do­ing so, but Can­tor’s loss will only en­er­gize the re­cruit­ment ef­forts.

An­oth­er law­maker worth watch­ing is Rep. Tom Price, who is set to suc­ceed Rep. Paul Ry­an as chair­man of the Budget Com­mit­tee. Price’s al­lies have long ar­gued that the am­bi­tious law­maker will be sat­is­fied with his chair­man­ship next year and won’t throw away that op­por­tun­ity to run for a lead­er­ship post; that think­ing could change very quickly in the weeks ahead.

And, of course, there’s Ry­an him­self, who has long denied in­terest in the speak­er­ship — likely to avoid con­flict with his friend Can­tor — but who now en­joys a wide-open path to the speak­er’s of­fice.

Still, there’s no ques­tion that policy is im­port­ant, and, in­deed, the policies com­ing from the ma­jor­ity lead­er’s of­fice have been in­creas­ingly prob­lem­at­ic for some con­ser­vat­ives. Can­tor has been em­phat­ic in con­ver­sa­tions with col­leagues that he wants to pass ser­i­ous im­mig­ra­tion re­form, es­pe­cially something that helps young il­leg­al im­mig­rants who were brought here by their par­ents — or, as Can­tor calls them, “the kids.” This im­age of Can­tor as soft on im­mig­ra­tion has hardened in re­cent months, prompt­ing Dave Brat, his primary chal­lenger, to at­tack the ma­jor­ity lead­er for sup­port­ing “am­nesty.”

If the im­mig­ra­tion talk wasn’t enough to rankle some of the con­fer­ence’s most con­ser­vat­ive mem­bers, Can­tor made more en­emies by musc­ling a flood-in­sur­ance bill through the House earli­er this year, over the ob­jec­tions of many Re­pub­lic­ans, in­clud­ing Hensarling, whose Fin­an­cial Ser­vices Com­mit­tee has jur­is­dic­tion over the mat­ter. (Some mem­bers saw Can­tor’s ac­tions as de­lib­er­ately in­ten­ded to weak­en Hensarling, who has emerged as the con­sensus choice of con­ser­vat­ives look­ing to vault one of their own in­to the up­per­most ech­el­ons of lead­er­ship.)

Per­haps most egre­giously, Can­tor in­furi­ated a siz­able bloc of House Re­pub­lic­ans in March by ap­prov­ing a man­euver that al­lowed a con­tro­ver­sial Medi­care-re­im­burse­ment bill to pass the House without a re­cor­ded roll-call vote. As mem­bers seethed over the al­leged trick­ery, Can­tor’s of­fice dis­missed the vis­cer­al back­lash, an­ger­ing some mem­bers who were long­time sup­port­ers of the ma­jor­ity lead­er. Be­fore that, the only rum­blings of a lead­er­ship shakeup in­volved Boehner; soon after, however, mem­bers began sug­gest­ing that Can­tor was no longer a shoo-in to suc­ceed him as speak­er.

“I’m get­ting used to be­ing de­ceived by the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion, but when my own lead­er­ship does it, it’s just not ac­cept­able,” Rep. Matt Sal­mon of Ari­zona said after the epis­ode.

An­oth­er House Re­pub­lic­an who is friendly with Can­tor put it more bluntly: “If there’s an­oth­er vote like [that], Eric won’t be speak­er. Ever.”

Still, Can­tor hasn’t ex­actly been a foil to tea-party Re­pub­lic­ans in the House; to the con­trary, some feel the ma­jor­ity lead­er is their strongest ally on the lead­er­ship team, and have en­dorsed his as­cen­sion to the speak­er­ship. Can­tor has spent years care­fully build­ing re­la­tion­ships and de­liv­er­ing fa­vors for mem­bers of his con­fer­ence, know­ing he would need their sup­port if he were to be­come speak­er.

But even the con­ser­vat­ive mem­bers who like Can­tor per­son­ally are cel­eb­rat­ing to­night — not be­cause he was their top tar­get but be­cause the ma­jor­ity lead­er em­bod­ies a lead­er­ship team they view as weak, re­act­ive, risk-averse, and ideo­lo­gic­ally di­luted.

After the House Re­pub­lic­ans’ first term in the ma­jor­ity was ruined by open in­terne­cine war­fare, a dozen con­ser­vat­ive mal­con­tents tried — and failed — to oust Boehner at the dawn of this 113th Con­gress. The speak­er re­spon­ded by spend­ing con­sid­er­able time and en­ergy last year restor­ing re­la­tions with the right wing of his con­fer­ence, and as a res­ult, 2013 was re­l­at­ively har­mo­ni­ous for the House GOP. (Boehner even won a stand­ing ova­tion when an­noun­cing the House GOP’s sur­render 16 days in­to the gov­ern­ment shut­down.)

But the dis­il­lu­sion­ment was quickly re­kindled in this second ses­sion. A large fac­tion of House Re­pub­lic­ans came in­to 2014 de­term­ined to pro­duce a pro­act­ive agenda, and pleaded with lead­er­ship to ad­dress four areas in par­tic­u­lar — health care, taxes, pri­vacy, and wel­fare spend­ing — so as to strike a sharp elec­tion-year con­trast against Demo­crats. Boehner’s team re­jec­ted that ap­proach, opt­ing in­stead to play it safe and avoid mis­steps that could cost Re­pub­lic­ans a chance to win the Sen­ate.

“There are no big ideas com­ing out of the con­fer­ence. Our lead­er­ship ex­pects to coast through this elec­tion by bank­ing on every­one’s hatred for Obama­care,” one Re­pub­lic­an law­maker who has been or­gan­iz­ing the anti-Boehner re­bel­lion said earli­er this year. “There’s noth­ing big be­ing done. We’re re­shuff­ling chairs on the Ti­tan­ic.”

The ap­proach taken by Boehner and Can­tor may yet help Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans take back the ma­jor­ity. Iron­ic­ally, it also might have en­sured that they won’t be around to work across the Cap­it­ol with them.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.