Eric Cantor Is Stepping Down From Leadership

The No. 2 House Republican will step down from his leadership position, after losing a primary for his seat on Tuesday night.

The U.S. Capitol is shown on the morning of June 11, 2014 in Washington, DC. Yesterday House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) lost his Virginia primary to Tea Party challenger Dave Brat.
National Journal
Billy House and Sarah Mimms
See more stories about...
Billy House Sarah Mimms
June 11, 2014, 9:24 a.m.

House Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor in­formed mem­bers of his con­fer­ence Wed­nes­day af­ter­noon that he will step down from his po­s­i­tion ef­fect­ive Ju­ly 31, set­ting up a spe­cial lead­er­ship elec­tion to re­place him. That elec­tion will be held next Thursday, June 19, ac­cord­ing to a Re­pub­lic­an source.

Can­tor lost a primary for his seat on Tues­day night. House Re­pub­lic­ans are hold­ing a spe­cial meet­ing this af­ter­noon, which star­ted at 4 p.m. in the base­ment of the Cap­it­ol. There is spec­u­la­tion fly­ing around the Hill that they will also dis­cuss a pos­sible suc­cessor at the meet­ing.

A press con­fer­ence is sched­uled for 4:30 p.m.

Can­tor’s exit would set off a race to re­place Can­tor as the num­ber two Re­pub­lic­an in the House. Already, Texas Reps. Jeb Hensarling and Pete Ses­sions have in­dic­ated that they are tak­ing a look at the race. House Ma­jor­ity Whip Kev­in Mc­Carthy is also ex­pec­ted to seek to move up the rung of House lead­er­ship.

Mc­Carthy wouldn’t com­ment on wheth­er he’ll seek Can­tor’s job, but said: “There will be an an­nounce­ment [at the 4 p.m. meet­ing].”

Rep. Steve Stivers, R-Ohio, says that Mc­Carthy told him that he will def­in­itely be run­ning for ma­jor­ity lead­er.

The House’s No. 4 Re­pub­lic­an Cathy Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers said in a state­ment that she’s stick­ing with her post as con­fer­ence chair, “after much en­cour­age­ment from my col­leagues, con­ver­sa­tions with my fam­ily, and many pray­ers.”

Wed­nes­day’s dis­cus­sions come as ten­sions are grow­ing on the Hill between con­ser­vat­ives and mem­bers of lead­er­ship. Many con­ser­vat­ives took last night’s race in Vir­gin­ia’s sev­enth con­gres­sion­al dis­trict as a ref­er­en­dum, not just on Can­tor, but on the House’s cur­rent lead­er­ship as a whole.

Con­cerns over Can­tor’s con­tin­ued pres­ence in lead­er­ship as a lame duck head­ing in­to the Novem­ber midterm elec­tions could also be a factor in­to his pos­sible exit.

Can­tor’s tech­nic­al du­ties as lead­er in­clude schedul­ing what bills go to the floor, along with the key role of de­vis­ing and mesh­ing the con­fer­ence’s over­all polit­ic­al and le­gis­lat­ive strategy. And there is no re­quire­ment for him to step down un­der in­tern­al House Re­pub­lic­an rules, ac­cord­ing to an aide fa­mil­i­ar with the rules.

But House GOP lead­er­ship aides, speak­ing on the con­di­tion they not be iden­ti­fied, de­scribed the choice that’s to be made by Can­tor on wheth­er he would stick around as lead­er as this:

On one hand, the ar­gu­ment for Can­tor step­ping down ASAP is that his de­feat by tea-party backed Dave Brat rep­res­ents a sort of “no con­fid­ence” vote from Can­tor’s own con­stitu­ents in Vir­gin­ia. And giv­en that, they also ques­tion wheth­er the con­fer­ence should have a de­feated “lame duck” so prom­in­ently at the helm next to Speak­er John Boehner through the sum­mer and stretch run of this year’s mid-term elec­tions, a re­mind­er to voters.

But an ar­gu­ment in fa­vor of keep­ing him around as long as pos­sible is that Boehner and the con­fer­ence don’t need — in fact should avoid — a po­ten­tially tu­mul­tu­ous and de­struct­ive in­tern­al lead­er­ship battle at this point be­fore the elec­tion, and that Boehner should ask Can­tor to stay on as lead­er. There are some who see such a con­test right now as po­ten­tially even an early proxy vote on Boehner him­self, and his en­tire lead­er­ship team.

Cor­rec­tion: An earli­er ver­sion of this story mis­stated Can­tor’s dis­trict. It is Vir­gin­ia’s sev­enth.

Tim Alberta contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
“PROFOUNDLY DANGEROUS”
Clinton Rips Into Trump
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Just a day after Donald Trump called her a bigot, Hillary Clinton delivered a scathing speech tying Trump to the KKK and so-called “alt-right.” This new frontier of debate between the two candidates has emerged at a time when Trump has been seeking to appeal to minority voters, among whom he has struggled to garner support. Calling him “profoundly dangerous,” Clinton didn’t hold back on her criticisms of Trump. “He is taking hate groups mainstream and helping a radical fringe take over the Republican Party,” Clinton said.

SEVEN-POINT LEAD IN A FOUR-WAY
Quinnipiac Has Clinton Over 50%
6 hours ago
THE LATEST

Hillary Clinton leads Donald Trump 51%-41% in a new Quinnipiac poll released today. Her lead shrinks to seven points when the third-party candidates are included. In that scenario, she leads 45%-38%, with Gary Johnson pulling 10% and Jill Stein at 4%.

Source:
PROCEDURES NOT FOLLOWED
Trump Not on Ballot in Minnesota
7 hours ago
THE LATEST
MIGHT STILL ACCEPT FOREIGN AND CORPORATE MONEY
Chelsea to Stay on Board of Clinton Foundation
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

Is the Clinton family backtracking on some of its promises to insulate the White House from the Clinton Foundation? Opposition researchers will certainly try to portray it that way. A foundation spokesman said yesterday that Chelsea Clinton will stay on its board, and that the "foundation’s largest project, the Clinton Health Access Initiative, might continue to accept foreign government and corporate funding."

Source:
INTERCEPT IN MIDDLE EAST
Navy Calls Iranian Ships’ Actions Dangerous, Unprofessional
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Four Iranian ships made reckless maneuvers close to a U.S. warship this week, the Pentagon said Thursday, in an incident that officials said could have led to dangerous escalation." The four Iranian vessels engaged in a "high-speed intercept" of a U.S. destroyer in the Strait of Hormuz. A Navy spokesman said the Iranina actions "created a dangerous, harassing situation that could have led to further escalation including additional defensive measures" by the destroyer.

Source:
×