California Is Feeding Its Bees Artificial Nectar to Keep Them From Starving

Thanks to a historic drought, honeybees in the state are going hungry.

National Journal
Marina Koren
June 17, 2014, 8:47 a.m.

In a good year, Cali­for­nia pro­duces more honey than any oth­er state. But the Golden State hasn’t seen a good year in al­most four years.

In that time, a drought has parched nat­ur­al for­age lands — and the wild flowers that provide hon­ey­bees with nec­tar. So Cali­for­nia bee­keep­ers have star­ted feed­ing their bees ar­ti­fi­cial nec­tar to keep them from starving, ac­cord­ing to KQED ra­dio.

The sta­tion fol­lowed bee­keep­er Dav­id Brad­shaw, who says, “You can tell the bees are hungry”:

In a nor­mal year, Brad­shaw takes his bees to hills laden with wild­flowers. But this year, those hills are bone dry, and they look bar­ren. Plants are mostly dormant, and that means the nat­ur­al nec­tar pro­duc­tion line is shut down.

When wild­flowers do bloom, they make nec­tar from sug­ar and wa­ter. Bees use the nec­tar to make honey. But a drought means less wa­ter, less nec­tar, and less honey.

So Brad­shaw is keep­ing his bees on the val­ley floor. In ad­di­tion to the syr­up, he’s feed­ing them a doughy pro­tein sup­ple­ment: soy flour, brew­er’s yeast, vit­am­ins, and min­er­als.

Ar­ti­fi­cial nec­tar isn’t cheap, either. Brad­shaw will spend $80,000 on the syr­up this sum­mer just to keep his colon­ies from starving, the sta­tion re­ports. His hives usu­ally pro­duce about 250 bar­rels of honey each year; they have gen­er­ated about one-tenth of that in the past three years.

In Cali­for­nia, a pro­longed drought is just one of sev­er­al un­for­tu­nate cir­cum­stances af­fect­ing the hon­ey­bee pop­u­la­tions. In­creas­ing rates of hab­it­at loss and pesti­cide use have also con­trib­uted to shrink­ing bee num­bers. This year’s hur­ricane sea­son is ex­pec­ted to bring heavy rains to the West Coast, but weath­er ex­perts are un­sure wheth­er they will be enough to help quench Cali­for­nia’s thirst — and its bees’ hun­ger.

What We're Following See More »
“PROFOUNDLY DANGEROUS”
Clinton Rips Into Trump
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Just a day after Donald Trump called her a bigot, Hillary Clinton delivered a scathing speech tying Trump to the KKK and so-called “alt-right.” This new frontier of debate between the two candidates has emerged at a time when Trump has been seeking to appeal to minority voters, among whom he has struggled to garner support. Calling him “profoundly dangerous,” Clinton didn’t hold back on her criticisms of Trump. “He is taking hate groups mainstream and helping a radical fringe take over the Republican Party,” Clinton said.

SEVEN-POINT LEAD IN A FOUR-WAY
Quinnipiac Has Clinton Over 50%
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

Hillary Clinton leads Donald Trump 51%-41% in a new Quinnipiac poll released today. Her lead shrinks to seven points when the third-party candidates are included. In that scenario, she leads 45%-38%, with Gary Johnson pulling 10% and Jill Stein at 4%.

Source:
PROCEDURES NOT FOLLOWED
Trump Not on Ballot in Minnesota
9 hours ago
THE LATEST
MIGHT STILL ACCEPT FOREIGN AND CORPORATE MONEY
Chelsea to Stay on Board of Clinton Foundation
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

Is the Clinton family backtracking on some of its promises to insulate the White House from the Clinton Foundation? Opposition researchers will certainly try to portray it that way. A foundation spokesman said yesterday that Chelsea Clinton will stay on its board, and that the "foundation’s largest project, the Clinton Health Access Initiative, might continue to accept foreign government and corporate funding."

Source:
INTERCEPT IN MIDDLE EAST
Navy Calls Iranian Ships’ Actions Dangerous, Unprofessional
11 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Four Iranian ships made reckless maneuvers close to a U.S. warship this week, the Pentagon said Thursday, in an incident that officials said could have led to dangerous escalation." The four Iranian vessels engaged in a "high-speed intercept" of a U.S. destroyer in the Strait of Hormuz. A Navy spokesman said the Iranina actions "created a dangerous, harassing situation that could have led to further escalation including additional defensive measures" by the destroyer.

Source:
×