Ahead of a White House Meeting, Top Republicans Are Bringing Afghanistan Into the Iraq Crisis

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell is using the chaos in Iraq to make a broader foreign policy pitch.

Caption:WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 19: U.S. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) speaks to reporters following the weekly policy lunch of the Republican caucus November 19, 2013 in Washington, DC. McConnell spoke on continued problems with the implementation of the Affordable Care Act during his remarks.
National Journal
Elahe Izad
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Elahe Izad
June 17, 2014, noon

The Sen­ate’s top Re­pub­lic­an says he’s not headed to a White House meet­ing Wed­nes­day with re­com­mend­a­tions on how to deal with the Ir­aq situ­ation, but that the crisis bol­sters the ar­gu­ment that U.S. troops are still needed in Afgh­anistan.

Mc­Con­nell, along with Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, House Speak­er John Boehner, and House Minor­ity Lead­er Nancy Pelosi, will head to the White House to meet with Pres­id­ent Obama “as part of his on­go­ing con­sulta­tions with con­gres­sion­al lead­er­ship on for­eign policy is­sues, in­clud­ing the situ­ation in Ir­aq,” ac­cord­ing to a White House of­fi­cial.

“I’m anxious to see what plan he may have, giv­en where we are, but it cer­tainly un­der­scores the sig­ni­fic­ance of the pres­id­ent re­vers­ing the de­cision he pre­vi­ously in­dic­ated he had made for us to leave Afgh­anistan en­tirely,” Mc­Con­nell said Tues­day. “We know that if we don’t leave be­hind a de­ploy­ment that the mil­it­ary re­com­men­ded in Afgh­anistan, roughly 10,000 troops, for coun­terter­ror­ism pur­poses and train­ing pur­poses, we’re likely to see the same kind of melt­down in Afgh­anistan that we’ve seen in Ir­aq.”

Hawk­ish Re­pub­lic­ans have been quick to cast blame for the crisis in Ir­aq squarely on the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion for agree­ing in 2011 to with­draw Amer­ic­an troops.

The wind­ing down of Amer­ica’s war in Afgh­anistan will take place over the next two years. Nearly 10,000 troops will re­main in Afgh­anistan through the end of this year, but that force will be re­duced by half by the end of 2015. The plan now is that by the end of Obama’s term, the U.S. pres­ence in Afgh­anistan will re­semble that of Ir­aq, with nor­mal em­bassy op­er­a­tions and a se­cur­ity as­sist­ance of­fice in the cap­it­al city.

The White House has already an­nounced it’s dis­patch­ing up to 275 mil­it­ary per­son­nel to pro­tect the U.S. Em­bassy in Ir­aq. Some law­makers have ex­pressed con­cern that Con­gress should be con­sul­ted ahead of any mil­it­ary ac­tion.

When asked if the pres­id­ent needs con­gres­sion­al ap­prov­al for mil­it­ary air strikes, Re­id said, “In my opin­ion, I don’t think they need any any more au­thor­ity than they already have to do what they need to do.”

What We're Following See More »
ON SANCTUARY CITIES
White House Attacks Judge Who Suspended Executive Order
23 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

U.S. District Judge William Orrick Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from enforcing part of an executive order calling for the end of federal funding to so-called sanctuary cities. The decision was followed by a scathing rebuke from the White House, a precedent-breaking activity which with this White House has had no qualms. A White House statement called the decision an "egregious overreach by a single, unelected district judge." The statement was followed by an inaccurate Wednesday morning tweetstorm from Trump, which railed against the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. While Judge Orrick district falls within the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit, Orrick himself does not serve on the Ninth Circuit.

MAY BRING CONSERVATIVES ON BOARD, BUT WHAT ABOUT MODERATES?
House GOP Circulates Amendment on Preexisting Conditions
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

"House Republicans are circulating the text of an amendment to their ObamaCare replacement bill that they believe could bring many conservatives on board. According to legislative text of the amendment," drafted by Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), "the measure would allow states to apply for waivers to repeal one of ObamaCare’s core protections for people with pre-existing conditions. Conservatives argue the provision drives up premiums for healthy people, but Democrats—and many more moderate Republicans—warn it would spark a return to the days when insurance companies could charge sick people exorbitantly high premiums."

AT LEAST 30 TO BE ASSESSED
Trump to Order Review of National Monuments
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump on Wednesday "will order a review of national monuments created over the past 20 years with an aim toward rescinding or resizing some of them—part of a broader push to reopen areas to drilling, mining, and other development." Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke told reporters on Tuesday said he'd be reviewing about 30 monuments.

Source:
EMERGING BUDGET FRAMEWORK?
Dems Proposes Obamacare-for-Defense Deal
17 hours ago
THE LATEST

"An emerging government funding deal would see Democrats agree to $15 billion in additional military funding in exchange for the GOP agreeing to fund healthcare subsidies, according to two congressional officials briefed on the talks. Facing a Friday deadline to pass a spending bill and avert a shutdown, Democrats are willing to go halfway to President Trump’s initial request of $30 billion in supplemental military funding."

Source:
WHITE HOUSE BLOCKING DOC REQUEST
Michael Flynn Remains A Russian-Sized Problem
17 hours ago
BREAKING

The Michael Flynn story is not going away for the White House as it tries to refocus its attention. The White House has denied requests from the House Oversight Committee for information and documents regarding payments that the former national security adviser received from Russian state television station RT and Russian firms. House Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz and ranking member Elijah Cummings also said that Flynn failed to report these payments on his security clearance application. White House legislative director Marc Short argued that the documents requested are either not in the possession of the White House or contain sensitive information he believes is not applicable to the committee's stated investigation.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login