Why Cantor’s Downfall Is Bad News for EPA

U.S. House Majority Whip Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) speaks during a media availability after a Republican Conference meeting December 13, 2011 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. The House is scheduled to vote on a bill today that combines the Keystone XL oil pipeline, year-end payroll tax holiday and unemployment insurance in the final passage, which President Barack Obama has threatened that he will veto. 
National Journal
Jason Plautz
Add to Briefcase
Jason Plautz
June 18, 2014, 1:05 a.m.

The En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency is already fa­cing a war on mul­tiple fronts as it works to re­view its smog stand­ards this year. En­vir­on­ment­al­ists have vowed to fight to get the stand­ards as low as pos­sible to get max­im­um health be­ne­fits, while in­dustry groups have been lin­ing up to fight what they say is the most costly en­vir­on­ment­al reg­u­la­tion to come out of the ad­min­is­tra­tion.

And now Eric Can­tor’s up­set loss has put one of the ozone rule’s con­gres­sion­al crit­ics — House Whip and pre­sumed next Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Kev­in Mc­Carthy — in po­s­i­tion to keep fight­ing it from the top.

EPA by Decem­ber will pro­pose a re­vi­sion to its reg­u­la­tion for ground-level ozone — or smog — that is linked to asthma and oth­er res­pir­at­ory prob­lems. It’s part of the reg­u­lar re­view of its air-qual­ity stand­ards re­quired un­der the Clean Air Act, and the agency is ex­pec­ted to lower the stand­ard from the 75 parts-per-bil­lion level set un­der the George W. Bush ad­min­is­tra­tion.

The crit­ics have fa­mil­i­ar talk­ing points: Com­pli­ance will re­quire costly pol­lu­tion con­trols and lim­its on trans­port­a­tion, and a state or re­gion in vi­ol­a­tion can face heavy fines. En­vir­on­ment­al­ists, mean­while, are par­tic­u­larly sens­it­ive to this rule since EPA’s last at­tempt to lower the stand­ard was squashed by the White House in 2011.

Mc­Carthy’s con­cerns are closer to home. His Bakersfield dis­trict is loc­ated in Cali­for­nia’s Cent­ral Val­ley, home to some of the worst air in the coun­try. How bad? In the Amer­ic­an Lung As­so­ci­ation’s 2014 State of the Air re­port, four cit­ies in the val­ley ranked two through five for the worst ozone qual­ity (the low­est-ranked city, Los Angeles, is just south).

That’s largely due to to­po­graphy. The re­gion is sur­roun­ded on three sides by moun­tains that al­lows pol­lut­ants to pool and get trapped by an in­ver­sion lay­er of hot air. Heavy traffic in the re­gion, coupled with re­cent eco­nom­ic de­vel­op­ment and tra­di­tion­al ag­ri­cul­ture, means lots of emis­sions. Dur­ing hot sum­mer months, the con­di­tions are ideal for dan­ger­ous levels of smog.

State of­fi­cials have worked to mit­ig­ate the pol­lu­tion by pla­cing re­stric­tions on sta­tion­ary sources, clean­ing of dies­el fuel, and reg­u­lat­ing ag­ri­cul­ture, among oth­er ef­forts. The num­ber of days vi­ol­at­ing the ozone lim­its has dropped stead­ily since 2000. But it’s still been an up­hill climb for the re­gion to meet fed­er­al stand­ards, and Mc­Carthy, along with oth­er rep­res­ent­at­ives of the re­gion, have said a tight­er stand­ard will only open the state up to heavy pen­al­ties.

In 2011, his first year as whip, Mc­Carthy in­tro­duced a bill that would have delayed im­ple­ment­a­tion of new ozone stand­ards un­til a loc­al ad­vis­ory com­mit­tee stud­ied the feas­ib­il­ity of com­pli­ance and would have re­pealed a fine im­posed on the Cent­ral Val­ley (the bill was rendered moot when the stand­ard was pulled).

Mc­Carthy also leads the House En­ergy Ac­tion Team, the part­ner­ship that pro­motes GOP en­ergy pri­or­it­ies and works against EPA reg­u­la­tions. The team’s mis­sion has in­cluded work on the air-qual­ity stand­ards. As a hint of its agenda this term, the group will host a brief­ing Wed­nes­day on air-qual­ity rules fea­tur­ing former EPA air chief Jeff Holmstead.

Mc­Carthy also last week — co­in­cid­ent­ally the same day as Can­tor’s de­feat — wrote to the EPA about a sep­ar­ate Cent­ral Val­ley air is­sue. He and five oth­er Cent­ral Val­ley rep­res­ent­at­ives asked the agency to de­clare an “ex­cep­tion­al event” and spare the state from fines for vi­ol­at­ing par­tic­u­late-mat­ter stand­ards be­cause of a months-long drought. The stand­ard is sep­ar­ate from the ozone rule, but speaks to the re­gion’s chal­lenges; state reg­u­lat­ors had pre­dicted the par­tic­u­late stand­ards would be met were it not for the drought’s im­pact.

The con­cern about back­ground ozone — the nat­ur­ally oc­cur­ring levels — has grown as a talk­ing point among op­pon­ents of a new stand­ard. The Amer­ic­an Pet­ro­leum In­sti­tute, for ex­ample, has cir­cu­lated a map warn­ing that a stand­ard of 60 ppb — likely be­low what the EPA will pro­pose — would put 94 per­cent of the coun­try in vi­ol­a­tion (that map in­cludes wide swaths of rur­al areas that aren’t mon­itored by EPA).

But en­vir­on­ment­al­ists have said that those con­cerns are un­foun­ded and that the pub­lic-health be­ne­fits will out­weigh the costs. Ac­cord­ing to EPA, the stand­ards could avert between 4,000 and 12,000 pre­ma­ture deaths and as many as 111,000 cases of res­pir­at­ory dis­ease by 2020.

It’s too early to know where EPA will go with the ozone stand­ard. The agency’s sci­entif­ic ad­vis­ory coun­cil said in a con­fer­ence call that it would re­com­mend a lim­it between 60 and 70 ppb, but cau­tioned that the up­per lim­it would have a “lim­ited mar­gin of safety” (they have yet to is­sue a form­al let­ter of re­com­mend­a­tion). That’s the same range that the ad­vis­ory board gave EPA in 2010, when the EPA pro­posed a stand­ard of 70 ppb un­til the White House stalled the ac­tion.

En­vir­on­ment­al­ists want to see a num­ber lower than 70 — in fact some have said that the start­ing point should be 60 ppb to get the max­im­um health be­ne­fits.

EPA is un­der a court or­der to pro­pose a stand­ard by Decem­ber and fi­nal­ize it by Oc­to­ber 2015, al­though the agency has said its fi­nal ac­tion won’t be un­til Novem­ber of that year. All of which gives Mc­Carthy plenty of time to settle in­to his of­fice be­fore the stand­ards come across his desk.

What We're Following See More »
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

SAYS THEY CHEATED TESTS
Government Sues Fiat Chrysler Over Emissions
10 hours ago
THE LATEST

The government alleges the company put eight “software-based features” on diesel engines in nearly 104,000 Ram pickups and Jeep Grand Cherokees from the 2014 to 2016 model years, which allowed the vehicles to emit fewer pollutants during EPA lab tests than during normal driving conditions.

Source:
DETAILS ARE CLASSIFIED
Brennan Saw Russia Intelligence “Worthy” of Investigation
14 hours ago
THE LATEST

At an open hearing of the House Intelligence Committee, former CIA chief John Brennan said he saw information on Trump-Russia contacts that were worth a further look. "Having been involved in many counterintelligence cases in the past, I know what the Russians do. They try to suborn individuals," Brennan said. "And they try to get individuals, including U.S. persons, to act on their behalf, whether wittingly or unwittingly. And I was worried by a number of the contacts that the Russians had with U.S. persons, and so therefore by the time I left office ... I had unresolved questions in my mind."

Source:
STAFF HAS COMPILED A SHORT LIST
Trump Enlisting Help of Outside Counsel
15 hours ago
THE LATEST

"President Trump is moving rapidly toward assembling outside counsel to help him navigate the investigations into his campaign and Russian interference in last year’s election, and in recent days he and his advisers have privately courted several prominent attorneys to join the effort. By Monday, a list of finalists for the legal team had emerged, according to four people briefed on the discussions."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login