The Government Has a Proud, Long History of Reforming Washington’s Football Team

Wednesday’s decision by the U.S. Patent Office is just the latest.

Native Americans protest before the Minnesota Vikings and Washington Redskins game on November 7, 2013 at Mall of America Field at the Hubert Humphrey Metrodome in Minneapolis, Minnesota. 
National Journal
Matt Berman
Add to Briefcase
Matt Berman
June 18, 2014, 8:01 a.m.

The dec­ades-long con­tro­versy over the Wash­ing­ton Red­skins’ name has hit a cli­max. On Wed­nes­day morn­ing, the United States Pat­ent and Trade­mark Of­fice can­celed six fed­er­al trade­mark re­gis­tra­tions for the team’s name and logo, call­ing the name “dis­par­aging to Nat­ive Amer­ic­ans.” The of­fice can’t stop the team from us­ing the name, but it can (at least pending a court re­versal) bar the right to re­gis­tra­tion pro­tec­tions.

This is the second time the of­fice has is­sued such a judg­ment. The first time was as part of a case that began in 1992, but that de­cision was ap­pealed by the team and ul­ti­mately over­ruled by a fed­er­al court due in part to a lack of sub­stan­tial evid­ence that the name is dis­par­aging.

“We are con­fid­ent we will pre­vail once again,” the Red­skins said in a state­ment Wed­nes­day af­ter­noon. “The evid­ence in the cur­rent claim is vir­tu­ally identic­al to the evid­ence a fed­er­al judge de­cided was in­suf­fi­cient more than ten years ago. We ex­pect the same ul­ti­mate out­come here.”

But the team’s crit­ics aren’t feel­ing too bad about their chances. “Daniel Snyder may be the last per­son to real­ize this,” Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id said on the floor Wed­nes­day after the de­cision came down, “but it’s just a mat­ter of time un­til he’s forced to do the right thing and change the name.”

There is a huge, con­ten­tious his­tory between the Wash­ing­ton Red­skins and the United States gov­ern­ment. And what the his­tory has shown is that, short of an iron­clad gov­ern­ment in­ter­ven­tion, the Red­skins aren’t likely to change any­thing. That’s what happened in the early 1960s, when the Red­skins were the last ra­cially se­greg­ated pro foot­ball team in Amer­ica.

Even though Wash­ing­ton was a ma­jor­ity black city by 1960, the team’s then-own­er, George Pre­ston Mar­shall, re­fused to de­seg­reg­ate his team. His team was the team of the South, and he be­lieved he be­nefited from keep­ing the team all white.

What fi­nally pushed him over the edge was John F. Kennedy’s ad­min­is­tra­tion. As de­tailed in Thomas G. Smith’s Show­down: JFK and the In­teg­ra­tion of the Wash­ing­ton Red­skins, the team was plan­ning to move in 1961 to a sta­di­um built on fed­er­al land. Kennedy’s In­teri­or sec­ret­ary, Stew­art Ud­all (fath­er of Sen. Tom Ud­all, uncle of Sen. Mark Ud­all), gave the team an ul­ti­mat­um: De­seg­reg­ate or lose the sta­di­um.

On March, 24, 1961, Ud­all told Mar­shall that his de­part­ment had ap­proved reg­u­la­tions bar­ring job dis­crim­in­a­tion by any­one who wants to use “any pub­lic fa­cil­ity in a park area.” At a news con­fer­ence later that day, Ud­all said of Mar­shall that “I think it is quite plain that if he wants an ar­gu­ment, he is go­ing to have a mor­al ar­gu­ment with the pres­id­ent and with the ad­min­is­tra­tion.”

After ini­tial an­ger and push-back from Mar­shall, the plan worked. By late May, Mar­shall said that he’d go by the law even if it meant put­ting “Eski­mos or Chinese or Mon­go­li­ans” on his team. Ud­all gave Mar­shall a little wiggle room, al­low­ing the team to stand se­greg­ated un­til the 1962 sea­son, after the Decem­ber 1961 draft. At that draft, Mar­shall draf­ted mul­tiple black play­ers, even­tu­ally trad­ing one of those picks for Bobby Mitchell, a black who would later be in­duc­ted in­to the Hall of Fame.

Ud­al later wrote that he moved against the team be­cause of his “per­son­al con­vic­tions about civil rights” and be­cause he “con­sidered it out­rageous that the Red­skins were the last team in the NFL to have a lily-white policy.” Ud­all didn’t go over the plan with JFK ahead of time, but felt that JFK would agree with it on prin­ciple.

It’s not just the U.S. Pat­ent Of­fice act­ing today. Mul­tiple con­gres­sion­al lead­ers, in­clud­ing Re­id, have been push­ing the Red­skins to change their name for months now. His­tory shows that gov­ern­ment ac­tion to force the team’s hand can work.

This post has been up­dated with a state­ment from the foot­ball team.

What We're Following See More »
CANNOT “IN GOOD CONSCIENCE” VOTE FOR BILL
McCain Won’t Support Graham-Cassidy Bill
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

In a statement Friday, Sen. John McCain wrote, "I cannot in good conscience vote for the Graham-Cassidy proposal. I believe we could do better working together, Republicans and Democrats, and have not yet really tried. Nor could I support it without knowing how much it will cost, how it will effect insurance premiums, and how many people will be helped or hurt by it. Without a full CBO score, which won't be available by the end of the month, we won't have reliable answers to any of those questions." His "no" vote makes it much less likely Republicans will repeal and replace Obamacare by Sept. 30.

Source:
NEW DIRECTIVES ISSUED
DeVos Officially Replaces Obama-era Sexual Assault Guidelines
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

As anticipated, the Department of Education today withdrew the controversial Obama-era "Dear Colleague" letter on campus sexual assault, replacing it with new interim guidance. Most notably, the new guidance permits colleges to use a “clear and convincing” standard of evidence, rather than the preponderance of evidence standard that the 2011 letter seemed to mandate. "The new guidance also states that colleges may facilitate informal resolutions, including mediation, if all parties agree to participate in that process."

Source:
EXPECTED TO TAKE EFFECT BY SUNDAY
Country-Specific Rules to Replace Travel Ban
4 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The Trump administration will unveil more tailored restrictions on travelers from certain countries as a replacement to the controversial travel ban, according to a senior administration official. The new restrictions will vary by country. They could include a ban on travel to the United States, or new restrictions on obtaining a visa for citizens of particular countries." They are expected to be unveiled by Sunday.

Source:
MORE TRANSPARENCY THAN FEC REQUIRES
Facebook Enhances Disclosure for Political Ads
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In a live-streamed address from Silicon Valley, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg announced a nine-point plan that the tech giant is rolling out over coming months to respond to "efforts by nation-states and private actors to use the social media platform to influence U.S. elections." Most importantly, the company will force all advertisers to disclose what ads they're running to all audiences. “When someone buys political ads on TV or other media, they’re required by law to disclose who paid for them,” Zuckerberg said. “But you still don’t know if you’re seeing the same messages as everyone else. So we’re going to bring Facebook to an even higher standard of transparency. Not only will you have to disclose which page paid for an ad, but we will also make it so you can visit an advertiser’s page and see the ads they’re currently running to any audience on Facebook.”

Source:
TRUMP ADMIN CRACKING DOWN ON LEAKS
Mandatory Training EPA Employees on Leaking
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

As "part of a broader Trump administration order for anti-leaks training at all executive branch agencies," Environmental Protection Agency employees "are attending mandatory training sessions this week to reinforce their compliance with laws and rules against leaking classified or sensitive government information ... Relatively few EPA employees deal with classified files, but the new training also reinforces requirements to keep 'Controlled Unclassified Information' from unauthorized disclosure."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login