This week showed how businesses are attempting to reshape higher education for a workforce that desperately needs advanced degrees.
To keep up with changing industries and changing technologies, the American workforce needs job training and further education in order to compete. But education is expensive, and traditional degrees on a physical campus are just not realistic or practical for many full-time workers.
To combat this problem in the tech field, online education provider Udacity partnered with AT&T to create a new kind of college degree that takes less time and less money than a master’s degree. It’s called a “nanodegree.”
The nanodegree is designed for people who work in software development. Without having to take time off, students can earn these certificates in front- and back-end Web development, iOS and Android mobile development, and data analysis. The nanodegree is designed to be stackable, earning you more as your career progresses, complementing whatever degree you’ve already earned. Industries, especially digital ones, change significantly year by year. A master’s degree earned in 2009 might be irrelevant by 2014.
Udacity will start offering the courses, which will cost around $200 per month, in the fall. The programs will take between six and 12 months to complete.
Not only did AT&T make an initial $1.5 million investment in the program, the company will also offer 100 internships to nanodegree graduates. Additionally, AT&T is encouraging its employees to participate in the programs.
But the obstacles of job training, time commitments, and costs are also relevant for people in low-wage positions. Many of these workers do not have enough money for advanced degrees, nor do they have time to take classes, because many have second jobs.
For its part, Starbucks over the weekend announced it would cover half the cost of a four-year online degree through Arizona State University for its employees, using financial assistance and tuition reimbursements. Starbucks employees must work in company-owned stores and log 20 hours per week to take advantage of these benefits. The company does not require employees to stay with Starbucks after they graduate.
Of Starbucks’ 135,000 employees, the university predicts that between 15,000 and 20,000 will enroll. There are some downsides to the program, however, including other upfront costs and the limited nature of online education.
But if the model proves successful, other low-wage employers could follow it. Right now, Wal-Mart Stores has a partnership with a for-profit university, but the results have not been widely successful.
However, it’s not as if all companies are suddenly going to start providing education benefits for their employees. Per The Wall Street Journal:
Many other employers have cut back on education assistance. A 2014 survey conducted by the Society for Human Resources Management found that 54% of employers offered undergraduate educational assistance, down from 62% in 2010.
But it is wise for businesses to start looking to do something. These collaborations between the private sector and education providers also help employers. For AT&T, the company gets a more educated workforce. For Starbucks, it stands to retain employees longer, saving money on job training that it would have spent on new employees.
And this is just the start. Udacity promises further programs with corporate partners. And more companies are likely to get in the game of changing the face of higher education.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."