Bad News for Comcast Deal in FCC Report

The cable giant did well in the study, but it undercuts a Comcast argument for buying Time Warner Cable.

POMPANO BEACH, FL - FEBRUARY 13: A Comcast truck is seen parked at one of their centers on February 13, 2014 in Pompano Beach, Florida. Today, Comcast announced a $45-billion offer for Time Warner Cable. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
National Journal
Brendan Sasso
Add to Briefcase
Brendan Sasso
June 18, 2014, 12:19 p.m.

Com­cast per­formed well in an In­ter­net speed study re­leased Wed­nes­day, but the fed­er­al re­port could still be a blow to the cable gi­ant’s plan to buy Time Warner Cable.

The Fed­er­al Com­mu­nic­a­tions Com­mis­sion re­port found that DSL con­tin­ues to lag be­hind oth­er In­ter­net ser­vice op­tions such as cable and fiber, call­ing in­to ques­tion just how com­pet­it­ive the broad­band mar­ket really is.

A key ar­gu­ment that Com­cast is mak­ing for why it should be al­lowed to buy Time Warner Cable is that con­sumers have an ar­ray of oth­er choices for In­ter­net ser­vice. The Justice De­part­ment and FCC are cur­rently re­view­ing wheth­er the mer­ger of the top two cable com­pan­ies would il­leg­ally sup­press com­pet­i­tion.

In testi­mony be­fore the Sen­ate Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee earli­er this year, Dav­id Co­hen, Com­cast’s ex­ec­ut­ive vice pres­id­ent, said DSL pro­viders are “for­mid­able broad­band com­pet­it­ors.”

“While some may scoff at the com­pet­it­ive vi­ab­il­ity of DSL ser­vice, mar­ket real­it­ies and in­vest­ments by tel­cos in DSL tech­no­logy that have led to in­creased DSL speeds re­but those con­cerns,” Co­hen said.

While the re­port found that many In­ter­net ser­vices have got­ten faster in re­cent years, DSL pro­viders showed “little or no im­prove­ment in max­im­um speeds.”

Ad­di­tion­ally, DSL pro­viders are ad­vert­ising faster speeds than they ac­tu­ally de­liv­er, the agency found. Ac­cord­ing to the re­port, DSL pro­viders were the only com­pan­ies to fail to de­liv­er at least 90 per­cent of the speeds that they ad­vert­ised.

The re­port also found that con­sumers are in­creas­ingly de­mand­ing faster ser­vice, fur­ther un­der­cut­ting Com­cast’s claim that many con­sumers would be will­ing to switch to DSL.

Com­cast and oth­er cable pro­viders per­formed well in the study. Com­cast de­livered 108 per­cent of its ad­vert­ised down­load speeds dur­ing peak hours, a slight im­prove­ment over last year’s res­ults.

The FCC sent let­ters to the DSL pro­viders and oth­er un­der­per­form­ing com­pan­ies de­mand­ing more in­form­a­tion about why their cus­tom­ers aren’t get­ting the speeds they paid for.

In a state­ment, FCC Chair­man Tom Wheel­er said it is “en­cour­aging” that some pro­viders are im­prov­ing their ser­vices but he is “con­cerned that some pro­viders are fail­ing to de­liv­er con­sist­ent speeds to con­sumers that are com­men­sur­ate to their ad­vert­ised speeds.”

Har­old Feld, the seni­or vice pres­id­ent of con­sumer-ad­vocacy group Pub­lic Know­ledge, said the re­port is “one more piece of evid­ence” that the gov­ern­ment should kill the cable mer­ger.

“Cable broad­band is not a dir­ect com­pet­it­or to DSL in a rel­ev­ant way,” he said, point­ing to “in­her­ent lim­it­a­tions” in DSL tech­no­logy.

He ad­ded that the re­port could ac­tu­ally bol­ster AT&T’s case for why it should be al­lowed to buy Dir­ecTV. AT&T has ar­gued it needs ad­di­tion­al rev­en­ue to up­grade its DSL net­work.

Com­cast did not re­spond to a re­quest to com­ment, but the Na­tion­al Cable and Tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions As­so­ci­ation, a lob­by­ing group that rep­res­ents Com­cast and oth­ers, pub­lished a blog post tout­ing the strong per­form­ance of cable pro­viders.

“The good news from a cable per­spect­ive is that pro­viders are de­liv­er­ing speeds that con­sist­ently meet or ex­ceed ad­vert­ised num­bers,” the as­so­ci­ation wrote.

What We're Following See More »
APPEALS COURT RULED TRUMP EXCEEDED HIS AUTHORITY
Supreme Court Takes Up Trump Travel Ban
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Supreme Court announced "that it would consider a challenge to President Trump’s latest effort to limit travel from countries said to pose a threat to the nation’s security." The case concerns Trump's most recent attempt to make good on a campaign promise "tainted by religious animus" and only questionably justified by national security concerns. The decision to take the case, called Trump v. Hawaii, comes almost exactly a year after Trump issued the first travel ban. The ban under consideration affects Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Chad and North Korea.

Source:
FACES STIFF OPPOSITION FROM BOTH PARTIES
Trump Proposes 95 Percent Cut To Office of Drug Control Budget
11 hours ago
THE LATEST

Trump wants to move the two grants, the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas grant and the Drug Free Communities Act, to the Justice and Health and Human Services departments, respectively. This would result in a $300 million plus reduction in funding, about 95 percent of the cost of the Office of National Drug Control Policy. "'I’m baffled at the idea of cutting the office or reducing it significantly and taking away its programs in the middle of an epidemic,'" said Regina LaBelle, who served as ONDCP chief of staff during the Obama administration. This is the second time the Trump Administration has proposed gutting the agency.

Source:
HOPES A DEAL CAN GET DONE
Schumer Meeting with Trump for Last-Ditch Meeting
12 hours ago
THE LATEST
BY SCALISE
House Told to “Stay Flexible”
14 hours ago
THE DETAILS
ALREADY PASSED CR, MCCARTHY SAYS
House Is Heading Home
15 hours ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login