Must-Pass Budget Bill Stalls Over Global-Warming Fight

Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) arrives at a Senate Select Intelligence Committee closed briefing on Capitol Hill, September 5, 2013 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Clare Foran
Add to Briefcase
Clare Foran
June 19, 2014, 9:14 a.m.

With a White House veto threat loom­ing, top Sen­ate Demo­crats on Thursday froze pro­gress on a key spend­ing bill.

At is­sue: a Re­pub­lic­an at­tempt to at­tach lan­guage to the meas­ure that would block Pres­id­ent Obama’s plan to use the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency to ad­dress power plants’ con­tri­bu­tions to glob­al warm­ing.

The de­clar­a­tion sig­nals Obama’s de­term­in­a­tion to up­hold the re­cently un­veiled glob­al-warm­ing rule, which stands to be­come the linch­pin of the pres­id­ent’s en­vir­on­ment­al leg­acy.

Con­gress has un­til the end of Septem­ber to ap­prove the spend­ing bills needed to stave off an­oth­er gov­ern­ment shut­down, but the fight over cli­mate ac­tion raises an­oth­er hurdle to passing this sec­tion of the budget — which would lay out the next fisc­al year’s worth of fin­ances on en­ergy and wa­ter pro­grams.

Sen. Bar­bara Mikul­ski, the chair of the Sen­ate pan­el where the bill was set to be marked up, said the le­gis­la­tion would have to be voted on even­tu­ally, but that she pulled it from con­sid­er­a­tion Thursday after re­ceiv­ing word from the White House that the pres­id­ent would veto any anti-EPA riders.

“The amend­ment was a bill killer,” Sen. Di­anne Fein­stein, an­oth­er Demo­crat on the pan­el, said dur­ing the hear­ing. “If it didn’t lead to de­feat on the Sen­ate floor, it would have res­ul­ted in a White House veto; that was con­firmed to me by the White House yes­ter­day.”

Ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials weighed in dur­ing an el­ev­enth-hour scramble Wed­nes­day night as Mikul­ski and Fein­stein tried to de­cide wheth­er to pro­ceed.

Re­pub­lic­an mem­bers of the pan­el cast the de­cision as an­oth­er in­stance of Sen­ate Demo­crats dis­al­low­ing amend­ment votes sought by the minor­ity.

“I’m so troubled by the de­cision today,” said Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Lamar Al­ex­an­der. “I hope we think about what we’re do­ing here. This can­not be the way the Sen­ate works.”

What We're Following See More »
McCain Won’t Support Graham-Cassidy Bill
2 hours ago

In a statement Friday, Sen. John McCain wrote, "I cannot in good conscience vote for the Graham-Cassidy proposal. I believe we could do better working together, Republicans and Democrats, and have not yet really tried. Nor could I support it without knowing how much it will cost, how it will effect insurance premiums, and how many people will be helped or hurt by it. Without a full CBO score, which won't be available by the end of the month, we won't have reliable answers to any of those questions." His "no" vote makes it much less likely Republicans will repeal and replace Obamacare by Sept. 30.

DeVos Officially Replaces Obama-era Sexual Assault Guidelines
3 hours ago

As anticipated, the Department of Education today withdrew the controversial Obama-era "Dear Colleague" letter on campus sexual assault, replacing it with new interim guidance. Most notably, the new guidance permits colleges to use a “clear and convincing” standard of evidence, rather than the preponderance of evidence standard that the 2011 letter seemed to mandate. "The new guidance also states that colleges may facilitate informal resolutions, including mediation, if all parties agree to participate in that process."

Country-Specific Rules to Replace Travel Ban
4 hours ago

"The Trump administration will unveil more tailored restrictions on travelers from certain countries as a replacement to the controversial travel ban, according to a senior administration official. The new restrictions will vary by country. They could include a ban on travel to the United States, or new restrictions on obtaining a visa for citizens of particular countries." They are expected to be unveiled by Sunday.

Facebook Enhances Disclosure for Political Ads
5 hours ago

In a live-streamed address from Silicon Valley, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg announced a nine-point plan that the tech giant is rolling out over coming months to respond to "efforts by nation-states and private actors to use the social media platform to influence U.S. elections." Most importantly, the company will force all advertisers to disclose what ads they're running to all audiences. “When someone buys political ads on TV or other media, they’re required by law to disclose who paid for them,” Zuckerberg said. “But you still don’t know if you’re seeing the same messages as everyone else. So we’re going to bring Facebook to an even higher standard of transparency. Not only will you have to disclose which page paid for an ad, but we will also make it so you can visit an advertiser’s page and see the ads they’re currently running to any audience on Facebook.”

Mandatory Training EPA Employees on Leaking
6 hours ago

As "part of a broader Trump administration order for anti-leaks training at all executive branch agencies," Environmental Protection Agency employees "are attending mandatory training sessions this week to reinforce their compliance with laws and rules against leaking classified or sensitive government information ... Relatively few EPA employees deal with classified files, but the new training also reinforces requirements to keep 'Controlled Unclassified Information' from unauthorized disclosure."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.