CIA Sued for Failing to Disclose Senate Torture-Probe Records

The lawsuit comes as the administration is close to declassifying a Senate report on the agency’s one-time interrogation techniques.

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 11: U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) walks off the Senate floor after speaking about the CIA on March 11, 2014 in Washington, DC. Feinstein who is Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee has accused the CIA of secretly removing documents from computers used by the committee. 
National Journal
Dustin Volz
June 24, 2014, 12:42 p.m.

A pair of open-gov­ern­ment ad­voc­ates are su­ing the CIA for its con­tin­ued secrecy re­gard­ing its al­leged hack­ing of Sen­ate com­puters, mark­ing the latest es­cal­a­tion in a cov­ert war ra­ging between Con­gress and the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion over Bush-era tor­ture prac­tices.

Freel­ance journ­al­ist Jason Leo­pold and Ry­an Sha­piro, a doc­tor­al can­did­ate at the Mas­sachu­setts In­sti­tute of Tech­no­logy, filed a law­suit Tues­day on grounds the in­tel­li­gence agency has re­fused to com­ply with Free­dom of In­form­a­tion Act re­quests they sent in April. The pair is seek­ing CIA re­cords that per­tain to a clas­si­fied Sen­ate re­view of the agency’s now-de­funct de­ten­tion, rendi­tion, and in­ter­rog­a­tion activ­it­ies.

That re­view gained new at­ten­tion this spring after Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Di­anne Fein­stein ac­cused the CIA of spy­ing on her pan­el in an at­tempt to im­pede its in­vest­ig­a­tion. The power­ful Cali­for­nia Demo­crat, in a blis­ter­ing 40-minute speech from the Sen­ate floor, at­tacked the in­tel­li­gence agency for pos­sibly vi­ol­at­ing the Con­sti­tu­tion by re­moved key files from com­puters used by her staff dur­ing the probe. She ad­di­tion­ally called on the Justice De­part­ment to in­vest­ig­ate wheth­er the CIA had broken the law.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4807) }}

Fein­stein’s the­at­ric­al gam­bit paid off, as her com­mit­tee voted to make a 500-page ex­ec­ut­ive sum­mary of the re­port pub­lic. That sum­mary is cur­rently un­der­go­ing an ex­haust­ive re­dac­tion pro­cess, and the CIA is re­portedly near­ing com­ple­tion of its re­view. The White House is ex­pec­ted to be­gin its re­dac­tion pro­cess soon.

But open-gov­ern­ment act­iv­ists have de­man­ded that the agency re­veal to what ex­tent it was snoop­ing on its Sen­ate over­seers, a tac­tic that, if true, is seen as fun­da­ment­ally un­der­min­ing the sep­ar­a­tion-of-powers prin­ciples of gov­ern­ment en­shrined in the Con­sti­tu­tion.

In April, Leo­pold and Sha­piro filed a sweep­ing in­form­a­tion re­quest with the CIA seek­ing, among oth­er things, cop­ies of “all writ­ten agree­ments and cor­res­pond­ence” between the Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee and the CIA deal­ing with an agree­ment made to al­low the pan­el’s staffers to ac­cess agency doc­u­ments at its fa­cil­ity in Langley, Va. The pair ad­di­tion­ally sought re­cords “doc­u­ment­ing any CIA in­vest­ig­a­tion” in­to the Sen­ate’s in­vest­ig­a­tion, and any in­tern­al “talk­ing points” cir­cu­lated ad­vising of­fi­cials on how to dis­cuss the con­tro­versy.

But the CIA has not yet com­plied, Leo­pold and Sha­piro said in their law­suit, which is re­quest­ing swift com­pli­ance.

Leo­pold and Sha­piro are well-known and ef­fect­ive open-gov­ern­ment agit­at­ors, and have suc­cess­fully ob­tained gov­ern­ment doc­u­ments that have shed light on a lit­any of sens­it­ive is­sues, ran­ging from the U.S. in­volve­ment in the 1962 ar­rest of Nel­son Man­dela to the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency’s in­tern­al in­sist­ence to use the Sept. 11, 2001, ter­ror­ist at­tacks as a “sound bite” to jus­ti­fy its sur­veil­lance pro­grams.

“The U.S. in­tel­li­gence com­munity is no­tori­ous for its pro­found hos­til­ity to trans­par­ency,” Sha­piro said. “In the present case, the CIA ap­pears to have spied upon the very Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee tasked with over­see­ing the CIA’s tor­ture pro­gram, while at the same time smear­ing that Sen­ate com­mit­tee’s re­view with un­sup­por­ted al­leg­a­tions of crimin­al­ity.”

The Sen­ate re­port at the cen­ter of the saga, parts of which have been leaked already, is ex­pec­ted to cast an un­flat­ter­ing light on the CIA’s secret in­ter­rog­a­tion tech­niques em­ployed dur­ing George W. Bush’s pres­id­ency, which brought the coun­try in­to two sep­ar­ate wars in Afgh­anistan and Ir­aq.

The CIA was not im­me­di­ately avail­able for com­ment.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
2 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×