Negotiators Seen Downplaying Iran’s Atomic Past

Global Security Newswire Staff
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
June 25, 2014, 6:48 a.m.

Ir­an ap­par­ently faces little U.S. pres­sure to fully re­count its nuc­le­ar past amid a glob­al push to rein in its cur­rent ef­forts, the New York Times re­ports.

Obama in­siders said Ir­an would nev­er of­fer a look at many of its sens­it­ive fa­cil­it­ies in a pos­sible pack­age deal to as­sure oth­er coun­tries that it is not seek­ing a nuc­le­ar-arms ca­pa­city, the news­pa­per re­por­ted on Tues­day. Ne­go­ti­at­ors from Wash­ing­ton and five oth­er cap­it­als want to re­strict the na­tion’s bomb-us­able nuc­le­ar activ­it­ies un­der terms they hope to fi­nal­ize with Tehran by Ju­ly 20, when an in­ter­im ac­cord with the Per­sian Gulf power is sched­ule to ex­pire.

Still, no po­ten­tial agree­ment would re­veal Ir­an’s level of ex­pert­ise on mat­ters that could help it to as­semble a nuc­le­ar bomb if it de­cided to do so, ac­cord­ing to the Times. A lack of full trans­par­ency would leave U.S. in­tel­li­gence of­fi­cials with the task of en­sur­ing that Ir­an does not secretly pur­sue nuc­le­ar arms, des­pite their mixed his­tor­ic­al suc­cess in con­duct­ing such over­sight.

A top U.N. nuc­le­ar watch­dog of­fi­cial ad­ded that it is “not pos­sible to find out everything” about Ir­an’s past nuc­le­ar activ­it­ies, in­clud­ing pos­sible ele­ments geared to­ward weapons de­vel­op­ment.

“Some doc­u­ments have dis­ap­peared,” In­ter­na­tion­al Atom­ic En­ergy Agency Dir­ect­or-Gen­er­al Yukiya Amano told the news­pa­per last week. “Some people have already died. In some cases, Ir­an does not give us ac­cess.”

He ad­ded that his or­gan­iz­a­tion has “not yet made a spe­cif­ic re­quest” to in­ter­view Mohsen Fahkr­iz­a­deh, the pos­sible lead­er of nuc­le­ar-arms ef­forts in Ir­an. 

In Wash­ing­ton, law­makers on Tues­day aired wor­ries about “the enorm­ous chal­lenge of mon­it­or­ing and veri­fy­ing any po­ten­tial fi­nal agree­ment with Ir­an,” as House For­eign Af­fairs Com­mit­tee Chair­man Ed Royce (R-Cal­if.) put it.

In a clas­si­fied meet­ing, pan­el mem­bers “noted that the onus is on Ir­an to prove that it has not en­gaged in a cov­ert weapons pro­gram,” Royce said in pre­pared com­ments.

What We're Following See More »
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
18 hours ago

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
19 hours ago

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
19 hours ago

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
23 hours ago

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."