Where the Buoys Are, Budget Cuts Wait for Me

National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Maggie Fox
March 11, 2011, 12:41 p.m.

An early-warn­ing sys­tem that helped res­id­ents on the West Coast of the U.S. pre­pare for Fri­day’s tsunami worked as de­signed but is vul­ner­able to pro­posed budget cuts, ex­perts say.

The 8.9-mag­nitude earth­quake that struck Ja­pan has killed at least 1,000 people, ac­cord­ing to Tokyo-based Ky­odo News, and triggered a tsunami that dev­ast­ated some coastal areas of the coun­try and caused dam­age as far away as Cali­for­nia.

A string of 39 buoys op­er­ated by the Na­tion­al Ocean­ic and At­mo­spher­ic Ad­min­is­tra­tion is an im­port­ant part of the world’s early-warn­ing sys­tem for such waves. As re­cently as last Oc­to­ber, a pan­el of ex­perts at the Na­tion­al Re­search Coun­cil raised con­cerns that the warn­ing sys­tem had weak­nesses.

Nev­er­the­less, it worked well in this case, NOAA said. “I think we showed today we were able to suc­cess­fully get the in­form­a­tion out to every­one who needed it,” Laura Fur­gione, the deputy as­sist­ant ad­min­is­trat­or of NOAA’s Na­tion­al Weath­er Ser­vice, told re­port­ers in a con­fer­ence call. 

 “There were no, quote, holes in this situ­ation.” 

The Na­tion­al Weath­er Ser­vice Em­ploy­ees Or­gan­iz­a­tion has been com­plain­ing that pro­posed budget cuts will dam­age the ser­vice’s abil­ity to warn people not only about tsuna­mis but also about oth­er dan­ger­ous events, such as hur­ricanes, tor­nadoes, and bliz­zards.

The uni­on says that Con­gress’s con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion for keep­ing the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment fun­ded would cut the Weath­er Ser­vice’s budget by 28 per­cent and dam­age early-warn­ing ef­forts.

“What would hap­pen if the con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion passes [is], there will be a dis­mant­ling of our na­tion’s early-warn­ing sys­tem,” Dan Sobi­en, pres­id­ent of the Na­tion­al Weath­er Ser­vice Em­ploy­ees Or­gan­iz­a­tion, said in a tele­phone in­ter­view. “It would res­ult in a roughly 30 per­cent cut in the budget of the Na­tion­al Weath­er Ser­vice.” Sobi­en said that cur­rent plans call for the Weath­er Ser­vice to close in­di­vidu­al of­fices for about a month at a time on a rolling basis.

Sen. Jay Rock­e­feller, D-W.Va., who chairs the Com­merce, Sci­ence, and Trans­port­a­tion Com­mit­tee, said that Fri­day’s events un­der­score the danger.

“Earth­quakes and all weath­er events hap­pen any­where, any­time put­ting every­one at risk,” he said in a state­ment.

“Con­gress must heed this cruel wake-up call and stop pro­posed cuts to es­sen­tial NOAA pre­dic­tion pro­grams that would en­danger lives. We must push to make the smart in­vest­ments in our greatest minds and re­sources at NOAA, so that we can bet­ter pre­dict severe weath­er events and be pre­pared for the worst.”

Martha Grabow­ski of Le Moyne Col­lege in Syra­cuse, N.Y., and Rens­selaer Poly­tech­nic In­sti­tute in Troy, N.Y., helped lead the Na­tion­al Re­search Coun­cil pan­el that re­por­ted on weak­nesses in the warn­ing sys­tem, which was up­graded con­sid­er­ably in the years after a 2004 quake in In­done­sia and a res­ult­ing tsunami that killed more than 200,000 people in the In­di­an Ocean basin. 

Key to the sys­tem is a string of Deep-ocean As­sess­ment and Re­port­ing of Tsuna­mis (DART) devices, ocean-floor sensors that can de­tect changes in pres­sure when a tsunami rolls over and are de­signed to trans­mit a sig­nal to a buoy on the sur­face, which in turn sends a sig­nal to a satel­lite, which then re­lays it to a Tsunami Warn­ing Cen­ter. 

“Most con­cern­ing is the com­mit­tee’s find­ing that as much as 30 per­cent of DART sta­tions are in­op­er­able at any giv­en time,” the Na­tion­al Re­search Coun­cil, an in­de­pend­ent re­search or­gan­iz­a­tion, re­por­ted. 

Des­pite that, “they work well,” Grabow­ski said in a tele­phone in­ter­view. “The sys­tem is highly re­li­able.”

But the sys­tem is vul­ner­able to budget cuts, she said.

“I think that in years where budgets are tight, it is easi­er to fo­cus on areas where dis­asters don’t hap­pen all the time. One of the prob­lems with tsuna­mis is they hap­pen fairly in­fre­quently,” Grabow­ski said. “It is harder to get the at­ten­tion of the pub­lic and le­gis­lat­ors.”

NOAA’s Fur­gione said that some of the buoys are cur­rently not work­ing but that the situ­ation did not af­fect the agency’s abil­ity to warn people in plenty of time to evac­u­ate vul­ner­able coastal areas.

“We do have some DARTs that are down in the Pa­cific re­gion,” she said. Heavy winter seas make it hard to get to some of the devices to ser­vice them, Fur­gione said, but ad­ded that the sys­tem is set up to ac­count for this.

“We have backup op­er­a­tions for everything that we do,” she said.

Fur­gione ac­know­ledged that the $28 mil­lion budget for the DART pro­gram is sched­uled for cuts. “We’ll do the best with what we have,” she said.

Contributions by Josh Smith

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.