The Obama campaign thinks it can again win electoral votes beyond the traditionally Democratic states. Easier said than done.

Add to Briefcase
George E. Condon Jr.
Oct. 20, 2011, 11:30 a.m.

There were plenty of wry smiles, know­ing nods, and arched eye­brows in Wash­ing­ton when Barack Obama’s cam­paign team let it be known in 2008 that it would spend money in, and send Obama to, In­di­ana and Vir­gin­ia. Re­pub­lic­an strategists were de­lighted to see op­pon­ent re­sources mis­spent, and wor­ried Demo­crat­ic strategists lob­bied to di­vert time else­where. After all, neither state had voted for a Demo­crat for pres­id­ent in the 10 elec­tions since 1964. It was dif­fi­cult to be­lieve that either was poised for a re­versal. Al­most as odd, an­oth­er state that found it­self get­ting un­ex­pec­ted at­ten­tion — North Car­o­lina — had deser­ted the GOP only once in that span, when it voted for South­ern­er Jimmy Carter in 1976.

The Obama man­tra was “ex­pand the map,” which meant chal­len­ging Re­pub­lic­ans on what once seemed like their turf but now showed signs of change — par­tic­u­larly grow­ing di­versity and in­creas­ing edu­ca­tion among white voters. That helps ex­plain the cam­paign’s ex­pan­sion in­to Col­or­ado, Nevada, and New Mex­ico, too. It also sym­bol­ized the con­tin­ued evol­u­tion of the Demo­crat­ic co­ali­tion away from white, blue-col­lar, and seni­or voters who dom­in­ate tra­di­tion­al Mid­west­ern swing states to­ward minor­it­ies, youths, and well-edu­cated whites in parts of the Sun Belt. When the votes were coun­ted, the strategy res­ul­ted in three states and 39 more elect­or­al votes in Obama’s fold.

Four years later, “ex­pand the map” is again the man­tra. It is why the pres­id­ent spent three days this week on a bus trav­el­ing the back roads of North Car­o­lina and Vir­gin­ia. And it is why the pres­id­ent’s team is look­ing for new states to pry from the Re­pub­lic­an base in 2012. This time, they have Ari­zona and Geor­gia in their sights.

President Obama may have difficulty repeating his 2008 victories in states that don't always vote for Democrats. National Journal

But it won’t be easy. If polit­ic­al in­siders thought suc­cess was im­prob­able in 2008, they privately view these new chal­lenges as closer to im­possible. Nev­er­the­less, hav­ing proved the in­siders wrong once, the Obama brain trust in Chica­go is not in­clined to listen. “The Demo­crats can nev­er go back to the elect­or­al map of 2000 or 2004, where the whole cam­paign comes down to one or two states,” said Ben LaBolt, the cam­paign’s spokes­man. “We’re work­ing to chart mul­tiple paths to vic­tory.” LaBolt doesn’t have to spe­cify those “one or two states.” Every­body knows they are Flor­ida and Ohio. If Al Gore in 2000 or John Kerry in 2004 had won either one, he would have be­come pres­id­ent. Obama is de­term­ined not to let his fate rest on those two states.

The com­mit­ment shows in the bus tour and the fre­quent pres­id­en­tial vis­its. It shows in the se­lec­tion of North Car­o­lina to host the Demo­crat­ic Na­tion­al Con­ven­tion. And it shows in the cam­paign of­fices opened more than a year be­fore the elec­tion. Already op­er­at­ing are of­fices in Raleigh, Char­lotte, and Greens­boro in North Car­o­lina; Phoenix and Tuc­son in Ari­zona; In­di­ana­pol­is in In­di­ana; At­lanta in Geor­gia; and Rich­mond in Vir­gin­ia. New­port News will fol­low there soon.

This time, the skep­tics are par­tic­u­larly doubt­ful about the Peach State (even if the demo­graph­ics are slowly chan­ging), be­cause it went for John Mc­Cain 52 per­cent to 47 per­cent over Obama. “Geor­gia is a fool’s er­rand,” said vet­er­an Re­pub­lic­an strategist Charlie Black, who ac­know­ledged that Ari­zona makes more sense with fa­vor­ite son Mc­Cain no longer atop the tick­et. Black also sees Vir­gin­ia as “a true swing state these days.”

Merle Black, a polit­ic­al sci­ent­ist at Emory Uni­versity and a lead­ing ex­pert on South­ern polit­ics, like­wise won­ders about adding Geor­gia to the tar­get list. Demo­crats are cor­rect that demo­graph­ic changes over the last dec­ade have altered the state’s elect­or­ate, he says: It is more Afric­an-Amer­ic­an, more Asi­an, and more Latino than be­fore. Some Demo­crat­ic strategists be­lieve that Obama could win Geor­gia if he gets heavy minor­ity turnout and man­ages to win at least 25 per­cent of the white vote. That will be dif­fi­cult, however.

In 2008, only 23 per­cent of whites in Geor­gia voted for Obama, the fourth-low­est sup­port in the coun­try, be­hind only Alabama (10 per­cent), Mis­sis­sippi (11 per­cent), and Louisi­ana (14 per­cent). That was a far cry from the suc­cess that Obama had with whites in Vir­gin­ia (39 per­cent) and North Car­o­lina (35 per­cent). “It is hard to think that Obama has be­come more pop­u­lar with white voters in Geor­gia than he was three years ago, giv­en that the eco­nomy is in ter­rible shape,” Merle Black said. Demo­crats suffered their worst-ever thrash­ing in Geor­gia in 2010, he poin­ted out. “The Demo­crats lost the white con­ser­vat­ives here a long time ago. Now they’ve lost the white mod­er­ates. So they’re down to white lib­er­als and minor­it­ies.”

The pic­ture is much less bleak in North Car­o­lina and, par­tic­u­larly, in Vir­gin­ia, which long­time Demo­crat­ic strategist Tad Dev­ine calls “very much in play for the pres­id­ent.” It is crit­ic­al for Obama to avoid “get­ting backed in­to some Elect­or­al Col­lege corner where it is all Ohio or it is all Flor­ida,” he said. “The im­port­ant thing for the pres­id­ent and his team is to make sure they have as many states as pos­sible in play for as long as pos­sible.”

But Dev­ine wor­ries the Re­pub­lic­ans will not be caught as un­der­fun­ded as they were in 2008. Charlie Black es­tim­ated that the Mc­Cain cam­paign and the Re­pub­lic­an Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee spent $450 mil­lion that year, while Obama and the Demo­crat­ic Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee spent $750 mil­lion. In 2012, in­de­pend­ent com­mit­tees have vowed to raise enough money to al­low the GOP nom­in­ee to counter Obama’s moves in­to un­ex­pec­ted states. It is just one more chal­lenge to Obama’s ef­forts to ex­pand the map. But don’t count on it sway­ing the team in Chica­go. They can’t wait to prove the ex­perts wrong again.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.