Iowa Evangelicals Considering Political Redemption for Gingrich

Republican presidential candidate former House Speaker Newt Gingrich talks to his wife Callista, during adebate in a presidential debate at Dartmouth College in Hanover, N.H., Tuesday, Oct. 11, 2011. (AP Photo/Scott Eells, Pool)
National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Sarah Huisenga and Alex Roarty
Dec. 2, 2011, 9:12 a.m.

DES MOINES, Iowa—Newt Gin­grich’s tu­mul­tu­ous per­son­al his­tory—two di­vorces and a tabloid full of sor­did de­tails sur­round­ing the cir­cum­stances of those break­ups—has for years made him a con­tro­ver­sial fig­ure among evan­gel­ic­al voters. But that im­port­ant seg­ment of the Re­pub­lic­an co­ali­tion, cour­ted ag­gress­ively by Gin­grich for more than a year, might be warm­ing to the former House speak­er as his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign surges in the polls. Their sup­port is crit­ic­al in a first test of his elect­or­al ap­peal in Iowa’s GOP caucus next month.

 “I think the polls are re­flect­ive that the evan­gel­ic­al com­munity and so­cial con­ser­vat­ives are will­ing to give the speak­er a second look,” said Bob Vander Plaats, an in­flu­en­tial Chris­ti­an polit­ic­al lead­er who heads the Iowa-based Fam­ily Lead­er. “I think they be­lieve him that he’s changed his life.”

Gin­grich mar­ried his third wife, Cal­lista, over 11 years ago after the two con­duc­ted a six-year af­fair while Gin­grich was still mar­ried to his second wife. Since their uni­on, Gin­grich has re­pen­ted for what he calls his earli­er mor­al short­com­ings. In 2007, he told James Dob­son, the head of the Fo­cus on the Fam­ily, that he had “sought God’s for­give­ness” for things he had done in his life, an in­ter­view that some so­cial con­ser­vat­ives point to as a turn­ing point in his re­la­tion­ship with them.

 “All of these can­did­ates are flawed to some de­gree,” said Steve Scheffler, head of the Iowa Faith and Free­dom Co­ali­tion. “I think Newt has been pretty can­did about his mor­al past, and he’s asked God for for­give­ness. I think people ac­cept that for what it is.”

 Mark Lun­d­bert, the chair­man of the Sioux County Re­pub­lic­an or­gan­iz­a­tion in one of the most con­ser­vat­ive parts of the state, said, “I think all things be­ing equal, if you can have some­body that meets all of your high mor­al stand­ards, that’s a plus. But I tell you what: Our coun­try has such key prob­lems now, we need the best per­son that can lead our coun­try out of this mess.”

He said he senses that Iowa’s re­li­gious con­ser­vat­ives are split when it comes to Gin­grich, but that an in­creas­ing num­ber are warm­ing to him. “I’ve very sur­prised at the num­ber of very con­ser­vat­ive people that are say­ing, “˜You know, we’re look­ing at Newt as well.’ “

Per­son­ally, Lun­d­bert said, “I’m to the point now where I want a really bright per­son to fix these prob­lems we’re hav­ing, be­cause clearly our cur­rent ad­min­is­tra­tion can’t fix them.”

In re­cent years, as he was con­sid­er­ing a pres­id­en­tial bid, Gin­grich made sev­er­al per­son­al and polit­ic­al moves that served to more closely align him with evan­gel­ic­al voters. About two years ago, Gin­grich, a South­ern Baptist who had not em­phas­ized his re­li­gion in his pro­fes­sion­al life, con­ver­ted to Cath­oli­cism, Cal­lista’s re­li­gion, and began to speak openly about his faith.

So­cial con­ser­vat­ive is­sues were not a fo­cus for him dur­ing his 20-year ca­reer in Con­gress. When Gin­grich began to get in­volved in the cam­paign against gay mar­riage, he held a series of meet­ings with pas­tors known for their ef­forts to pass bans on same-sex mar­riage in the states. Then in 2009, he es­tab­lished a non­profit or­gan­iz­a­tion called Re­new­ing Amer­ic­an Lead­er­ship de­voted to is­sues of im­port­ance to so­cial con­ser­vat­ives. The or­gan­iz­a­tion’s polit­ic­al arm poured $150,000 in­to the suc­cess­ful cam­paign by Iowa so­cial con­ser­vat­ives last year to oust three state Su­preme Court judges, who were tar­geted after the high court struck down a ban on same-sex mar­riage.

The lead­er of that ef­fort was Vander Plaats, and it marked a ma­jor vic­tory for the state’s so­cial con­ser­vat­ives. Since then, Gin­grich has in­cor­por­ated op­pos­i­tion to ju­di­cial act­iv­ism in­to his cam­paign mes­sage, warn­ing of the dangers of courts im­pos­ing their will on the rest of so­ci­ety.

 “I think that’s what helped him get some at­ten­tion from so­cial con­ser­vat­ives,” said Steve Deace, a con­ser­vat­ive talk-show host in Iowa. “He’s showed the most bold­ness on is­sues that mat­ter.”

That some evan­gel­ic­als are giv­ing Gin­grich a second look doesn’t mean all of them are happy about it. In­deed, word that Vander Plaats’s Fam­ily Lead­er might give him the group’s en­dorse­ment sparked a pub­lic spat this week with an an­onym­ous group call­ing it­self Iow­ans for Chris­ti­an Lead­ers in Gov­ern­ment. It ac­cused Vander Plaats of fa­vor­ing Gin­grich be­cause of a per­son­al re­la­tion­ship he had with the ex-con­gress­man while ig­nor­ing his past mar­it­al in­fi­del­ity.

South­ern Baptist lead­er Richard Land also wrote an open let­ter earli­er this week em­phas­iz­ing that many evan­gel­ic­al wo­men still har­bor con­cerns about Gin­grich, say­ing he thought less than a third of them would trust him to be pres­id­ent. He urged Gin­grich to give a com­plete ac­count­ing of his past in­dis­cre­tions.

 “Mr. Speak­er, if you want to get large num­bers of evan­gel­ic­als, par­tic­u­larly wo­men, to vote for you, you must ad­dress the is­sue of your mar­it­al past in a way that al­lays the fears of evan­gel­ic­al wo­men,” wrote Land, pres­id­ent of the Eth­ics and Re­li­gious Liberty Com­mis­sion of the South­ern Baptist Con­ven­tion. “You must ad­dress this is­sue of your mar­it­al past dir­ectly and trans­par­ently and ask folks to for­give you and give you their trust and their vote”

Vander Plaats, whose group is con­sid­er­ing wheth­er to en­dorse Gin­grich or an al­tern­at­ive can­did­ate, said, “I think there’s some people that will take a look at Newt’s past in­fi­del­ity, a couple of di­vorces, three mar­riage “¦ those types of things and say that’s too high a hurdle to clear to cast sup­port for Gin­grich.”

The group is also con­sid­er­ing Texas Gov. Rick Perry, Rep. Michele Bach­mann, R-Minn., and former Sen. Rick San­tor­um of Pennsylvania, but it has not in­cluded former Mas­sachu­setts Gov. Mitt Rom­ney on its list. 

The im­port­ance of the evan­gel­ic­al vote is hard to un­der­es­tim­ate in Iowa. Exit polls have shown that about two-thirds of Re­pub­lic­an caucus-go­ers in the state self-identi­fy as evan­gel­ic­al Chris­ti­ans. Giv­en Rom­ney’s re­l­at­ive strength in New Hamp­shire, which votes after Iowa next month, a vic­tory in the first caucus state would make Gin­grich a ser­i­ous con­tender for the Re­pub­lic­an nom­in­a­tion.

Gin­grich said him­self on Thursday dur­ing an ap­pear­ance in Des Moines, “It would be an enorm­ous ad­vant­age if we could win here. We’re go­ing to do everything we can.  I think we’ll be in the top two or three.  I can’t tell you to­night we’re go­ing to win, but cer­tainly we have an op­por­tun­ity to win here, and we’re go­ing to do all we can to win here.”


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.