The Presidential Race

For now, at least, reservations about Romney trump disappointment with Obama.

Add to Briefcase
Ronald Brownstein
Sept. 27, 2012, noon

For Pres­id­ent Obama, Elec­tion 2012 is look­ing more en­cour­aging as a choice than as a ref­er­en­dum.

In the latest All­state/Na­tion­al Journ­al Heart­land Mon­it­or Poll, as­sess­ments of Obama’s per­form­ance and agenda re­main equi­voc­al at best, es­pe­cially among whites. But the sur­vey finds Obama lap­ping Mitt Rom­ney in sev­er­al key com­par­is­ons, par­tic­u­larly those re­lat­ing to em­pathy.

Buoyed by those com­par­is­ons, Obama has opened a sol­id 50 per­cent to 43 per­cent lead over the Re­pub­lic­an nom­in­ee among likely voters in the bal­lot test for Novem­ber, the poll found. Obama drew sup­port from 78 per­cent of minor­it­ies and 41 per­cent of whites, each down only slightly from 2008.

The latest poll sur­veyed 1,000 adults for the en­tire ques­tion­naire by land­line and cell phone from Sept. 15 to 19; it also polled an­oth­er 250 adults to gen­er­ate a sample of 1,055 likely voters. The mar­gin of er­ror is 3.1 per­cent­age points for the first group and 3 points for the second.

The sur­vey asked Amer­ic­ans to rank Obama and Rom­ney on sev­en traits or char­ac­ter­ist­ics; the pres­id­ent led or tied on each one. Rom­ney ran even with Obama on strik­ing “the right bal­ance” on de­fi­cit re­duc­tion. Like­wise, those polled di­vided about evenly on which can­did­ate has “the ex­per­i­ence and skills” to im­prove the eco­nomy.

But even that equal split on man­aging the eco­nomy, which mir­rors oth­er re­cent na­tion­al res­ults, rep­res­ents a gain for Obama, who trailed on this crit­ic­al meas­ure in May’s Heart­land Mon­it­or Poll. And on each of the oth­er five traits meas­ured, Obama topped Rom­ney. The pres­id­ent held single-di­git leads when re­spond­ents were asked who was more likely to im­prove their fin­an­cial situ­ation or to keep his cam­paign prom­ises. Obama did best on three ques­tions re­lat­ing to em­pathy, with re­spond­ents provid­ing him double-di­git ad­vant­ages on sup­port­ing policies that would be­ne­fit people like them, help fu­ture gen­er­a­tions, and pro­mote op­por­tun­ity for all Amer­ic­ans.

Most of these com­par­is­ons evinced a sharp ra­cial di­vide. Among whites, Rom­ney held a double-di­git ad­vant­age on the eco­nomy, deal­ing with the de­fi­cit, and im­prov­ing their per­son­al fin­an­cial situ­ation; Obama ran even (or bet­ter) on those is­sues over­all, be­cause in each case at least two-thirds of minor­it­ies pre­ferred him. On the ques­tions re­lat­ing to em­pathy, though, the pres­id­ent nar­rowly led among whites on provid­ing op­por­tun­ity for all, and he trailed only slightly on cre­at­ing op­por­tun­ity for fu­ture gen­er­a­tions and for­mu­lat­ing policies that will be­ne­fit people like you. On all three ques­tions, at least 73 per­cent of minor­it­ies pre­ferred Obama.

On ques­tions about Obama’s per­form­ance, though, judg­ments re­mained con­sid­er­ably more mixed. Just 36 per­cent said that the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s ac­tions will in­crease their op­por­tun­it­ies to get ahead; an equal num­ber said that the pres­id­ent’s ac­tions will de­crease their op­por­tun­it­ies. This is the first time in the 10 times the poll has asked that ques­tion since Janu­ary 2010 that pos­it­ive re­sponses have even equaled neg­at­ive ones, but it re­mains a less than ringing en­dorse­ment. Not since Janu­ary 2010 have even 30 per­cent of whites said Obama’s agenda will in­crease their op­por­tun­it­ies; just 28 per­cent of whites said so in the latest sur­vey. By con­trast, the share of minor­it­ies who said Obama’s agenda will widen their op­por­tun­it­ies jumped to 62 per­cent, the highest level ever re­cor­ded in the poll.

Re­spond­ents di­vided along sim­il­ar lines on the over­all im­pact of Obama’s eco­nom­ic agenda: 46 per­cent said his policies did “help avoid an even worse eco­nom­ic crisis and are lay­ing the found­a­tion for our even­tu­al eco­nom­ic re­cov­ery,” while 44 per­cent said he has “run up a re­cord fed­er­al de­fi­cit while fail­ing to end the re­ces­sion or slow the re­cord pace of job losses.” That’s vir­tu­ally un­changed from this spring. Once again, the close over­all res­ult re­veals a ra­cial chasm: While 64 per­cent of minor­it­ies said his agenda has had pos­it­ive ef­fects, only 40 per­cent of whites agreed.

Judg­ment on Obama’s over­all job per­form­ance wasn’t much dif­fer­ent: 49 per­cent ap­proved, while 45 per­cent dis­ap­proved — only slightly im­proved from May. Again, the ra­cial gap is enorm­ous; Obama’s ap­prov­al rat­ing among whites (39 per­cent) was about half his show­ing among non­whites (76 per­cent). Likely voters reached an al­most identic­al ver­dict, with 50 per­cent ap­prov­ing and 46 per­cent dis­ap­prov­ing.

The likely voter sample pro­duced a sur­vey elect­or­ate that is 73 per­cent white (com­pared with 74 per­cent in 2008). Moreover, 34 per­cent of likely voters iden­ti­fied as Demo­crats, 28 per­cent as Re­pub­lic­ans, and 34 per­cent as in­de­pend­ents. (In 2008, Demo­crats out­numbered Re­pub­lic­ans in the elect­or­ate by 7 per­cent­age points.)

As al­ways with an in­cum­bent, judg­ments on Obama’s per­form­ance strongly cor­rel­ate with pref­er­ences in his reelec­tion: 93 per­cent of likely voters who ap­proved of the pres­id­ent’s per­form­ance said they in­tend to vote for him, while 87 per­cent of those who dis­ap­proved prefer Rom­ney. But the poll strongly sug­gests that for now, an im­port­ant slice of voters who are am­bi­val­ent about Obama are giv­ing him the be­ne­fit of the doubt against Rom­ney.

The sur­vey, for in­stance, found likely voters di­vided al­most ex­actly in thirds on the fam­ous Ron­ald Re­agan ques­tion Re­pub­lic­ans high­lighted at their Tampa con­ven­tion: 31 per­cent said they are bet­ter off than four years ago, 34 per­cent said they are worse off, and 34 per­cent said their con­di­tion is un­changed. But Rom­ney led in the bal­lot test only among the third who say they are worse off: The pres­id­ent not only led by al­most 10-to-1 among those who say they are bet­ter off, but he had a nearly 3-2 ad­vant­age among those who say their con­di­tion hasn’t changed. That lead re­flects an­oth­er find­ing: By a 48 per­cent to 41 per­cent plur­al­ity, likely voters said the coun­try is bet­ter off be­cause Obama, rather than an­oth­er can­did­ate, won in 2008.

Sim­il­arly, two-fifths of likely voters said the coun­try is already sig­ni­fic­antly worse off be­cause of Obama’s policies; nearly nine in 10 of them are back­ing Rom­ney in Novem­ber. Only one in six said the coun­try is already bet­ter off be­cause of Obama’s ac­tions; he draws over nine in 10 of them. But an­oth­er 41 per­cent said that while the pres­id­ent’s policies have not yet pro­duced sig­ni­fic­ant be­ne­fits, they are mov­ing the coun­try in the right dir­ec­tion — and four-fifths of them prefer Obama over Rom­ney.

In oth­er words, Rom­ney is lead­ing only among those who ex­press un­equi­voc­al dis­sat­is­fac­tion with Obama’s im­pact, just as the Re­pub­lic­an leads only among those who say they are flatly worse off than in 2008. On both ques­tions, those of­fer­ing qual­i­fied ver­dicts on Obama’s four years provided him strong mar­gins over the Re­pub­lic­an. Both res­ults re­in­force the sense that Obama’s ad­vant­age in this race rests on voters who aren’t fully sat­is­fied with his first term but re­main un­con­vinced that Rom­ney of­fers a bet­ter dir­ec­tion.

Contributions by Stephanie Czekalinsk

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.