Higher Investment-Tax Rates Won’t Slow Economic Recovery

Lawmakers may raise capital-gains and dividend taxes as part of a deficit deal. If so, they needn’t stress about the economic aftershocks.

National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Catherine Hollander
Nov. 15, 2012, noon

Al­most a dec­ade ago, Pres­id­ent Bush signed in­to law a bill that dra­mat­ic­ally cut taxes on in­vest­ment in­come. The Jobs and Growth Tax Re­lief Re­con­cili­ation Act of 2003 slashed the max­im­um rate to 15 per­cent on cap­it­al gains (down from 20 per­cent) and di­vidends (down from nearly 40 per­cent). Now GOP law­makers who re­fuse to raise in­come-tax rates are hunt­ing for new rev­en­ue to re­duce the de­fi­cit. If they tar­get in­vest­ment in­come, they can rest easy: High­er rates are un­likely to hurt the eco­nom­ic re­cov­ery.

Al­though eco­nom­ists widely agree that taxes on in­vest­ment in­come in­flu­ence in­vestor be­ha­vi­or, there’s little clear evid­ence that pre­vi­ous changes to the rates have had much im­pact on the eco­nomy’s over­all per­form­ance. And oth­er com­pon­ents of a de­fi­cit-re­duc­tion deal may off­set any af­ter­shock of a tax hike in this realm.

Pro­ponents of high­er taxes on in­vest­ment in­come point to evid­ence that lower­ing them con­trib­utes to eco­nom­ic in­equal­ity. “Changes in cap­it­al gains and di­vidends were the largest con­trib­ut­or to the in­crease in the over­all in­come in­equal­ity [between 1996 and 2006],” a re­port by the non­par­tis­an Con­gres­sion­al Re­search Ser­vice found last Decem­ber.

Op­pon­ents ar­gue that low rates spur job cre­ation and spend­ing by re­mov­ing a “double tax” on cor­por­ate profits (taxed first as earn­ings and again when the pay­off comes from di­vidends or in­vest­ment gains) and by en­cour­aging risk-tak­ing and in­vest­ment. “Rais­ing taxes on the re­turns to in­vest­ment does ap­pear to de­press the amount of in­vest­ment,” says Alan Viard, a res­id­ent schol­ar at the con­ser­vat­ive Amer­ic­an En­ter­prise In­sti­tute. The Tax Found­a­tion, a D.C.-based re­search group, es­tim­ates that rais­ing the rates on in­vest­ment in­come would knock just over 2 per­cent off of gross do­mest­ic product over the next five to 10 years.

But eco­nom­ic re­search is far from clear about how much the 2003 rate cuts af­fected the eco­nomy — and, by ex­ten­sion, what rais­ing rates would do to the 2013 re­cov­ery. In­come in­equal­ity would prob­ably have ris­en a dec­ade ago even without tax-policy changes, the CRS study con­cluded. A Treas­ury De­part­ment re­port in 2006 ar­gued that there was “little doubt” the 2003 tax cuts helped stim­u­late the eco­nomy in the months that fol­lowed. But it also said that the im­pact of these tax cuts on the labor mar­ket was “dif­fi­cult to quanti­fy” and that they were only one of “nu­mer­ous factors” (al­beit prob­ably an im­port­ant one) that led to the rise in stock prices.

The Cen­ter on Budget and Policy Pri­or­it­ies, a left-lean­ing think tank, picked up on these caveats that year and cited many pre­dic­tions in early 2003 that the eco­nomy was go­ing to take off any­way, with or without the in­vest­ment-in­come tax cuts. “While the di­vidend and cap­it­al-gains tax cuts were in­deed cor­rel­ated with the up­turn in the re­cov­ery, they were not the cause of the im­prove­ment,” the cen­ter’s Aviva Aron-Dine and Joel Fried­man wrote in a re­port.

The cor­rel­a­tion dis­ap­pears over the long term. Le­onard Bur­man, a pub­lic-af­fairs pro­fess­or at Syra­cuse Uni­versity’s Max­well School and former dir­ect­or of the in­de­pend­ent Tax Policy Cen­ter, charted the top tax rates on long-term cap­it­al gains and eco­nom­ic growth from 1950 to 2011 and found zero stat­ist­ic­al re­la­tion­ship between the two. “Does this prove that cap­it­al-gains taxes are un­re­lated to eco­nom­ic growth? Of course not,” he told a joint hear­ing of the House Ways and Means and Sen­ate Fin­ance com­mit­tees in Septem­ber. “But the graph should dis­pel the no­tion that cap­it­al-gains taxes are a very im­port­ant factor in the health of the eco­nomy. Cut­ting cap­it­al-gains taxes will not tur­bocharge the eco­nomy and rais­ing them would not ush­er in a de­pres­sion.”

Greg McBride, seni­or fin­an­cial ana­lyst at, says that the biggest risk to the eco­nomy from rais­ing taxes on cap­it­al gains and di­vidends would be through the stock mar­ket, not through any slow­down in spend­ing from the wealth­i­est seg­ment of the pop­u­la­tion, who would feel the high­er rates most acutely. “The biggest eco­nom­ic im­pact of those two spe­cif­ic changes is the dam­age to con­sumer con­fid­ence that comes from the res­ult­ing price cor­rec­tion in the stock mar­ket,” he says.

Stocks are already ex­pec­ted to tread on rocky ground between now and the end of the year. The twin threats of tax hikes and spend­ing cuts sched­uled to kick in on Jan. 2 threaten to throw the eco­nomy back in­to re­ces­sion in 2013. A “grand bar­gain” to sidestep the fisc­al cliff would re­move the cloud of un­cer­tainty and pre­vent re­ces­sion, ex­perts say. “A cred­ible fisc­al plan to put the fed­er­al budget on a longer-run sus­tain­able path could help keep longer-term in­terest rates low and im­prove house­hold and busi­ness con­fid­ence, thereby sup­port­ing im­proved eco­nom­ic per­form­ance today,” Fed­er­al Re­serve Board Chair­man Ben Bernanke told law­makers in the sum­mer. In that way, the salut­ary ef­fect of a de­fi­cit-re­duc­tion deal on the eco­nomy could blunt any neg­at­ive short-term ef­fects of a hike in in­vest­ment-in­come taxes.

Down the line, out­put and in­come will be high­er if de­fi­cits are smal­ler, the non­par­tis­an Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice said in an Au­gust re­port. As the short-term boost to the eco­nomy could mit­ig­ate the im­me­di­ate im­pact of high­er taxes on in­vest­ment in­come, so the long-run be­ne­fits of lower de­fi­cits could help off­set the im­pact of such taxes in years ahead.

This art­icle ap­peared in print as “In­vest­ment Math.”


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.