Washington the Biggest Loser as Wave Sweeps Through Congress

Ron Fournier
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Ron Fournier
Nov. 3, 2010, 3:49 a.m.

Up­dated at 7:49 a.m. on Novem­ber 3.

Who was the big loser Tues­day? The easy an­swer is Pres­id­ent Obama and his fel­low Demo­crats on this day of epic GOP vic­tor­ies in the House, the Sen­ate, and U.S. state­houses.

But there is a big­ger loser: Wash­ing­ton.

The wave of dis­ap­point­ment and dis­il­lu­sion­ment with Wash­ing­ton that swept Obama in­to of­fice two years ago nev­er went away. With the un­em­ploy­ment rate hov­er­ing near double di­gits, the pres­id­ent was un­able to de­liv­er the change that most Amer­ic­ans could be­lieve in, so voters de­livered a mes­sage of their own to the in­cum­bent party: Get out.

And so Re­pub­lic­ans won the House and nar­rowed the Demo­crat­ic ma­jor­ity in the Sen­ate. But even Re­pub­lic­ans ac­know­ledged that the res­ults were more of a ref­er­en­dum against Wash­ing­ton than a vote for the GOP.

“We make a great mis­take if we be­lieve that to­night these res­ults are some­how an em­brace of the Re­pub­lic­an Party,” said in­com­ing Sen. Marco Ru­bio of Flor­ida. A rising GOP star, Ru­bio seized his new role as a party lead­er and po­ten­tial pres­id­en­tial can­did­ate, cast­ing the res­ults as “a second chance for Re­pub­lic­ans to be what they said they were go­ing to be not so long ago.”

Even as he claimed the Speak­er’s gavel, Rep. John Boehner of Ohio said, “We’re wit­ness­ing a re­pu­di­ation of Wash­ing­ton, a re­pu­di­ation of big gov­ern­ment, and a re­pu­di­ation of politi­cians who re­fuse to listen to the Amer­ic­an people.” 

Re­cent polls sup­port the the­ory that a cranky, anxious elect­or­ate, strug­gling through an era of ex­ten­ded un­em­ploy­ment and un­der­em­ploy­ment, has lost faith in gov­ern­ment and its lead­ers:

  • More than 70 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans be­lieve the coun­try is on the wrong track.
  • Al­most as many be­lieve the na­tion faces a “lead­er­ship crisis.”
  • Three quar­ters of voters dis­ap­prove of Con­gress, a near re­cord low.
  • Nearly 6 out of every 10 voters are more will­ing to take a chance this year on a can­did­ate with little polit­ic­al ex­per­i­ence.
  • More than a quarter of voters are will­ing to back a can­did­ate whose views “seem ex­treme.”
  • Sur­veys con­sist­ently show Amer­ic­ans hold the Re­pub­lic­an Party in lower es­teem than the Demo­crat­ic Party, even as the GOP stormed to vic­tor­ies.

“This elec­tion is kind of re­dund­ant frus­tra­tion with Amer­ica,” said Andy Card, former chief of staff to Pres­id­ent George W. Bush. “I think there was frus­tra­tion with Re­pub­lic­ans. I think there was a lot of frus­tra­tion with Pres­id­ent Obama and the Demo­crats.”

“This is a re­dund­ant frus­tra­tion elec­tion where [voters] were say­ing we want real change in Wash­ing­ton, not change to fit your ideo­logy but change to in­clude us as the Amer­ic­an people,” Card said.

He seemed to be chan­nel­ing Obama, who told Na­tion­al Journ­al last month that re­gard­less of the out­come, “the most im­port­ant mes­sage that will be sent by the Amer­ic­an people is, we want people in Wash­ing­ton to act like grown-ups, co­oper­ate, and start try­ing to solve prob­lems in­stead of scor­ing polit­ic­al points.”

Elec­tion night is the easi­est time to act like a grownup. “I would ab­so­lutely ad­vise Re­pub­lic­ans to reach out to the pres­id­ent,” said 2008 GOP vice pres­id­en­tial nom­in­ee Sarah Pal­in. Usu­ally a par­tis­an flamethrow­er, Pal­in poin­ted to the na­tion’s weak eco­nomy and de­clared, “We’ll have to be on [a] uni­fied team here to get the eco­nomy roar­ing again.”

Newt Gin­grich, the GOP firebrand who helped force Demo­crats from power in 1994, said Tues­day’s res­ults cre­ated “a dra­mat­ic­ally weak­er Demo­crat­ic Party and a severely re­pu­di­ated Pres­id­ent Obama.” He’s right about that, of course. But does Gin­grich really think Amer­ic­ans gave the GOP a full-throated man­date? He made that mis­cal­cu­la­tion a gen­er­a­tion ago and over­reached as the new House Speak­er.

That mis­take helped reelect Demo­crat Bill Clin­ton.

Obama is not on any bal­lot, but the votes cast are a re­flec­tion of how his first two years failed to meet the lofty ex­pect­a­tions set in 2008. Lib­er­als ac­cuse him of ac­com­plish­ing too little. Con­ser­vat­ives ac­cuse him of turn­ing too of­ten to gov­ern­ment as a solu­tion.

His ap­prov­al rat­ing hov­ers around 45 per­cent, which is about where Pres­id­ent Clin­ton’s rat­ing stood dur­ing the 1994 midterm elec­tions. That was the year that Re­pub­lic­ans gained con­trol of Con­gress for the first time in four dec­ades.

The “mad-as-hell” eth­os powered the emer­gence of the tea party dur­ing Obama’s first sum­mer in of­fice. Fueled mostly by older, white, middle-class Amer­ic­ans with little polit­ic­al ex­per­i­ence, the move­ment sprang out of con­cern over the 2008 eco­nom­ic crisis and a sense by many con­ser­vat­ives that the GOP had aban­doned them.

Most tea party act­iv­ists con­sider Obama a big-spend­ing lib­er­al. Some even ques­tion his eli­gib­il­ity to be pres­id­ent.

Like a cow­boy sad­dling a buck­ing stal­lion, Re­pub­lic­an lead­ers tried to tame the tea party while rid­ing it to vic­tor­ies. The new House ma­jor­ity must now try to gov­ern while be­ing rid­den hard by tea party act­iv­ists. The risk is that the GOP will be driv­en to po­s­i­tions that turn off the same in­de­pend­ent voters who swung away from Demo­crats on Tues­day.

Still, it was a dra­mat­ic day for the GOP.

Re­pub­lic­ans gained more than the 52 seats they picked up on Elec­tion Day in 1994. While the gains were grow­ing overnight, they were un­likely to match the biggest year in re­cent memory: The 75-seat gain Demo­crats scored in 1948.

While Re­pub­lic­ans fell short of tak­ing con­trol of the Sen­ate, they did draw with­in four seats of a ma­jor­ity.

Demo­crats lost their slight edge in gov­ernor­ships, and also lost ma­jor­it­ies in more than a dozen state le­gis­lat­ive cham­bers. These are im­port­ant num­bers too, be­cause state lead­ers will soon be re­draw­ing con­gres­sion­al dis­tricts.

“We’ve come to take our gov­ern­ment back,” Sen.-elect Rand Paul of Ken­tucky told cheer­ing sup­port­ers at a vic­tory party in Bowl­ing Green, Ky. He soun­ded, for a mo­ment, like the Obama of just two years ago.

What We're Following See More »
John Warner to Endorse Clinton
6 minutes ago

"Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton will score another high-powered Republican endorsement on Wednesday, according to a campaign aide: retired senator John Warner of Virginia, a popular GOP maverick with renowned military credentials."

Appeals Court Hears Clean Power Plant Case
13 minutes ago

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Tuesday "heard several hours of oral arguments" over the Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan rules. The 10-judge panel "focused much of their questioning on whether the EPA had overstepped its legal authority by seeking to broadly compel this shift away from coal, a move the EPA calls the Best System of Emission Reduction, or BSER. The states and companies suing the EPA argue the agency doesn’t have the authority to regulate anything outside of a power plant itself."

Here Come the Ad Buys
25 minutes ago

"Spending by super PACs tied to Donald Trump friends such as Ben Carson and banker Andy Beal will help make this week the general election's most expensive yet. Republicans and Democrats will spend almost $28 million on radio and television this week, according to advertising records, as Trump substantially increases his advertising buy for the final stretch. He's spending $6.4 million in nine states, part of what aides have said will be a $100 million television campaign through Election Day."

Obama Nominates Ambassador to Cuba
4 hours ago
Reid Blocks Tech Bill Over “Broken Promise”
4 hours ago

Monday night's debate may have inspired some in Congress, as Senate Minority Leader has decided to take a stand of his own. Reid is declining to allow a vote on a "bipartisan bill that would bolster U.S. spectrum availability and the deployment of wireless broadband." Why? Because of a "broken promise" made a year ago by Republicans, who have refused to vote on confirmation for a Democratic commissioner on the Federal Communications Commission to a second term. Harry Reid then took it a step further, invoking another confirmation vote still outstanding, that of Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland.