Politics: Need-to-Know Video

N2K: Distractions Pulling Obama Off Message

Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
March 24, 2011, 4:49 p.m.

Ex-AK Gov. Sarah Pal­in (R) raised more than $1.2M for Sarah­PAC dur­ing the last quarter, “giv­ing $93,500 to con­ser­vat­ive can­did­ates and causes ahead of the loom­ing midterm elec­tions in which she’s played a ma­jor role.”

The fin­an­cial dis­clos­ure, filed 10/12 by her Sarah­PAC, shows Pal­in spent a total of about $1M dur­ing that time. Much of it — more than $255K — “went to con­sult­ants in areas in­clud­ing co­ali­tions, me­dia, in­ter­na­tion­al af­fairs and fin­ance.”

Pal­in, who has said re­peatedly that her im­me­di­ate fo­cus is on the midterm elec­tions and on help­ing elect can­did­ates she con­siders “com­mon­sense con­ser­vat­ives,” gave money to 15 can­did­ates, in­clud­ing NH SEN nom­in­ee Kelly Ayotte (R).

Her fun­drais­ing “ex­ceeds that from the pre­vi­ous re­port­ing peri­od, which covered April through June.” Then, Pal­in re­por­ted rais­ing about $866K and giv­ing at least $87,500 to can­did­ates.

For the latest re­port­ing peri­od, Sarah­PAC Treas. Tim Craw­ford said Sarah­PAC re­ceived an av­er­age of $50 from more than 21K con­trib­ut­ors. He said he “wouldn’t read any­thing in­to the spend­ing on con­sult­ing” — Pal­in’s last re­port showed her spend­ing more than $210K on con­sult­ing. He said he was writ­ing ad­di­tion­al checks to can­did­ates “right now. … There’s more com­ing.”

Pal­in’s re­port shows she ended the peri­od 9/30 with nearly $1.3M CoH. Craw­ford said “it’s up to Pal­in how much of that she plans to tap be­fore the elec­tion.” Craw­ford: “It’s there for what she wants” (Bo­hr­er, AP, 10/12).

In ad­di­tion to her con­tri­bu­tions to in­di­vidu­al can­did­ates, Sarah­PAC also con­trib­uted to the IA GOP, “an early hint of her pos­sible am­bi­tions” as a WH ‘12 can­did­ate.

Wheth­er Pal­in will run for WH ‘12 is un­clear. Some of her po­ten­tial chal­lengers, in­clud­ing ex-MA Gov. Mitt Rom­ney (R), “have a head start on her in terms of fund-rais­ing.”

Rom­ney “cre­ated a soph­ist­ic­ated net­work” of fed­er­al and state PACs to sup­port his bid. And Rom­ney “proved his fund-rais­ing prowess at the time, rais­ing mil­lions at sev­er­al one-day events.”

Pal­in’s PAC is lim­ited to $5K con­tri­bu­tions, “mak­ing it harder to take in huge sums of cash at one time” (Shear, New York Times, 10/12).

With the pro­spects for a ma­jor con­gres­sion­al over­haul of the im­mig­ra­tion sys­tem look­ing in­creas­ingly un­likely, tech com­pan­ies are seek­ing in­cre­ment­al changes that would make it easi­er for skilled for­eign­ers to stay in the United States per­man­ently.

Tech firms have long ar­gued that they can­not find enough skilled U.S. work­ers with de­grees in sci­ence, tech­no­logy, en­gin­eer­ing, and math (STEM) to meet their needs, not­ing that more than half of those who re­ceive ad­vanced STEM de­grees from U.S. schools are for­eign­ers.

A dec­ade ago, the fo­cus was on in­creas­ing the avail­ab­il­ity of H-1B visas, which com­pan­ies can use to bring to the U.S. for­eign work­ers with skills they can’t find among Amer­ic­an ap­plic­ants. While tech com­pan­ies had some suc­cess in the early part of the dec­ade in rais­ing the cap on such visas to 65,000 a year, the re­ces­sion has slowed de­mand for the visas.

In re­cent years, tech com­pan­ies have been more fo­cused on mak­ing the case that the gov­ern­ment should al­low tal­en­ted for­eign stu­dents with ad­vanced sci­ence and tech­no­logy de­grees from U.S. uni­versit­ies to stay per­man­ently, say­ing they are likely to be the job cre­at­ors of to­mor­row.

“This isn’t about a short­age. It’s about cre­at­ing jobs and cre­at­ing eco­nom­ic growth,” House Ju­di­ciary Im­mig­ra­tion Sub­com­mit­tee rank­ing mem­ber Zoe Lof­gren, D-Cal­if., whose dis­trict in­cludes part of Sil­ic­on Val­ley, said in an in­ter­view last week. She noted that half of Sil­ic­on Val­ley star­tups have im­mig­rant founders. The most fam­ous  in­clude Google co-founder Sergey Brin, a Rus­sia nat­ive, and Ya­hoo co-founder Jerry Yang, who was born in Taiwan.

Lof­gren and many in the in­dustry ar­gue that for­eign­ers from some coun­tries, par­tic­u­larly China and In­dia, face in­tol­er­able waits of as long as a dec­ade for green cards that al­low per­man­ent res­id­ency. Lof­gren said tech com­pan­ies have told her that if they can’t hire the people they need here, they will move some pro­jects to oth­er coun­tries.

“Most of the com­pan­ies I’ve spoken with in Tech­Net would prefer to open fa­cil­it­ies in the U.S.,” Tech­Net Pres­id­ent and CEO Rey Ram­sey said in an in­ter­view on Monday.

Ef­forts to re­vamp the green-card sys­tem for skilled for­eign­ers have been linked to com­pre­hens­ive im­mig­ra­tion re­form, which has so far gained little trac­tion. Giv­en that, sup­port­ers are push­ing Con­gress to act sep­ar­ately on the is­sue of skilled im­mig­rants.

Lof­gren in­tro­duced le­gis­la­tion in June that would al­low com­pan­ies to seek green cards for for­eign gradu­ates of U.S. uni­versit­ies with at least a mas­ter’s de­gree in sci­ence, tech­no­logy, en­gin­eer­ing, or math. It would also re­form sev­er­al em­ploy­ment visa pro­grams. She in­tro­duced an­oth­er bill this month that would lift the per-coun­try lim­its on green cards, a move aimed at ad­dress­ing the back­log of ap­plic­ants from China and In­dia in par­tic­u­lar. House Ju­di­ciary Chair­man Lamar Smith, R-Texas, and Rep. Jason Chaf­fetz, R-Utah, in­tro­duced a sim­il­ar bill last month that would lift the per-coun­try green card caps. The pan­el was sched­uled to take up their bill last week but post­poned ac­tion on it.

Chaf­fetz said he wants to fix leg­al im­mig­ra­tion be­fore he would con­sider a pro­pos­al to make more green cards avail­able for for­eign gradu­ates.

“I think we were in­ac­cur­ate when we as­sume that every­body wants to have cit­izen­ship,” he told Na­tion­al Journ­al last week. “Maybe they want to stay and work for a few years” us­ing em­ploy­ment visas.

Rochester In­sti­tute of Tech­no­logy pub­lic policy pro­fess­or Ron Hira wor­ries about ab­use by less-reput­able schools — par­tic­u­larly when it comes to mas­ter’s pro­grams. “I think it’s the wrong ap­proach to have a blanket ex­emp­tion,” Hira said. “What it will do is in­duce dip­loma mills.”

At a hear­ing earli­er this month, Smith said he shared con­cerns that schools might try to game such a sys­tem, but he ex­pressed hope in find­ing a middle ground. “The choice between send­ing all gradu­ates home and auto­mat­ic­ally is­su­ing visas to stu­dents are not the only op­tions avail­able,” he said.

Lof­gren’s pro­pos­al aims to counter that worry by lim­it­ing the num­ber of schools from which for­eign stu­dents could gradu­ate and be eli­gible for a green card.

“There should be stand­ards in place,” said Lynn Shot­well, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the Amer­ic­an Coun­cil on In­ter­na­tion­al Per­son­nel, adding that her group would be open to sug­ges­tions that stu­dents must re­tain a cer­tain grade-point av­er­age or gradu­ate from cer­tain schools. Her group is act­ive in a co­ali­tion known as Com­pete Amer­ica, which fa­vors ef­forts to make it easi­er for U.S. com­pan­ies to re­tain for­eign tal­ent in the United States. The co­ali­tion in­cludes many tech groups and com­pan­ies such as Google, Hew­lett-Pack­ard, In­tel, and Tech­Net.

Ram­sey ac­know­ledged the dif­fi­culty of mov­ing any le­gis­la­tion through Con­gress that would make it easi­er for for­eign­ers to get jobs in the U.S. at a time when so many Amer­ic­ans are un­em­ployed. “I think it com­plic­ates the sell,” he said. He ad­ded that his group has tried to mit­ig­ate such con­cerns by also fo­cus­ing on help­ing more Amer­ic­ans ob­tain the skills U.S. com­pan­ies are seek­ing.

What We're Following See More »
ANOTHER NUCLEAR OPTION?
Byrd Rule Could Trip Up Health Legislation
19 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”

Source:
ONE WEEK
Senate Votes To Fund Government
21 hours ago
BREAKING
ON TO SENATE
House Passes Spending Bill
22 hours ago
BREAKING

The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.

PRESIDENT CALLS MEDICAID FUNDS A “BAILOUT”
Puerto Rico Another Sticking Point in Budget Talks
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."

Source:
POTENTIAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?
Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
1 days ago
BREAKING

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login