TV Ads Target Republicans Over Medicare Reform Efforts

Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
April 25, 2011, 8:16 a.m.

“From the mo­ment” 10/11’s de­bate among the three SEN can­did­ates began “to the mo­ment it ended, Hoo­si­er voters were handed a tri­fecta of al­most in­vari­ably dif­fer­ent views.”

In “his first sen­tence,” Rep. Brad Ell­s­worth (D-08) “re­minded Hoo­siers” that he’s a former sher­iff and said Hoo­siers need to ask which can­did­ate will be work­ing for them and which for the spe­cial in­terests. And “in case that wasn’t clear, Ell­s­worth used every ques­tion he could” — wheth­er it was about jobs or term lim­its — “to make sure people knew” the last job ex-Sen. Dan Coats (R) had “was be­ing a lob­by­ist.”

Want More On This Race? Check out the Hot­line Dash­board for a com­pre­hens­ive run­down of this race, in­clud­ing stor­ies, polls, ads, FEC num­bers, and more!

Coats “re­turned the fa­vor, us­ing as many ques­tions as he could to make sure voters knew” that Ell­s­worth voted “nearly 90 per­cent of the time” with Pres. Obama and House Speak­er Nancy Pelosi. And “he used the last ques­tion” — about find­ing ways to re­duce par­tis­an snip­ing in DC — to “stress that he didn’t want” to re­turn to the Sen­ate “to sing Kum­baya across the aisle” (Schneider/Ruth­hart, In­di­ana­pol­is Star, 10/12).

Coats “lam­basted Ell­s­worth,” tak­ing “sharp aim at the new health care law.” Coats: “This was a pent-up, 25-year lib­er­al wish dream, and when they had the votes to push it through, my op­pon­ent was one of those very late votes that brought it to fruition.”

Ell­s­worth “de­fen­ded re­cent” Dem ini­ti­at­ives and “at­tacked Coats for the sev­en years he spent as a lob­by­ist.” Cit­ing hun­dreds of pages of lob­by­ing dis­clos­ure re­ports, he said, “I’ve got his doc­u­ment­a­tion. Either he’s not telling the truth or his law firm is not, and that’s against fed­er­al law.”

But “neither spent much time ar­tic­u­lat­ing a vis­ion for the next Con­gress.” After the de­bate, Ell­s­worth said the de­bate format doesn’t al­low enough time to talk in depth about fu­ture plans. Coats “lamen­ted that there were not enough op­por­tun­it­ies” to dis­cuss how the U.S. can boost a still-fal­ter­ing eco­nomy (Brad­ner, Evans­ville Cour­i­er & Press, 10/12).

Re­becca Sink-Burris (L) — “aptly po­si­tioned between Ell­s­worth and Coats like a de­mil­it­ar­ized zone — stressed to voters that they had a third choice.” She said if they wanted change in DC, voters should first try chan­ging the way they vote and break the Dem or GOP lock (In­di­ana­pol­is Star, 10/12).

Ell­s­worth and Coats both said they were ar­dently pro life, but Ell­s­worth said at a post de­bate press con­fer­ence that Coats had re­ceived money from Planned Par­ent­hood. Coats aide Kev­in Kelle­ms said after the de­bate that Ell­s­worth an­nounced he would vote for the health re­forms be­fore Rep. Bart Stupak (D-MI) worked out a deal with Obama on pro­hib­it­ing fed­er­al abor­tion fund­ing (Howey, Howey Polit­ics In­di­ana, 10/11).

In­di­ana­pol­is Star’s Tully writes, ul­ti­mately, a de­bate on a Monday even­ing “isn’t likely to be a game-changer. But in a race that many seem ready to call, Ell­s­worth put Coats on the de­fens­ive re­peatedly, for­cing him in­to awk­ward an­swers about his lob­by­ing ca­reer. He did what he needed to do” (10/12).

Win­ning at foot­ball is pretty simple: There’s the of­fense, the de­fense, and the spe­cial teams. As le­gendary coach Don James put it while he led the Uni­versity of Wash­ing­ton Huskies to the 1991 na­tion­al cham­pi­on­ship: Win two of those three, and you’ve won the game.

Win­ning at polit­ics is just as straight­for­ward. The vic­tors in a pres­id­en­tial con­test will out­per­form their rivals in at least two of three cat­egor­ies: the na­tion­al at­mo­spher­ics, the state-by-state battle for an Elect­or­al Col­lege vic­tory, and the on-the-ground or­gan­iz­ing it takes to drive your base to the polls.

In ad­vance of the 2012 elec­tions, Re­pub­lic­ans have a clear ad­vant­age in at­mo­spher­ics, while Demo­crats are best­ing the GOP in or­gan­iz­a­tion. Whichever side is able to claim the state-by-state battle will take the White House.

On a na­tion­al level, the mood is so sour that any pres­id­ent would be an un­der­dog. Pres­id­ent Obama’s ap­prov­al rat­ing has not topped 50 per­cent in the Real Clear Polit­ics av­er­age since June. He hasn’t been over 50 per­cent in any sur­vey since June 20; in that same time, his ap­prov­al rat­ing has dropped be­low 40 per­cent in three polls.

A sim­il­ar num­ber of Amer­ic­ans dis­ap­prove of Obama’s hand­ling of the eco­nomy, the is­sue likely to de­cide the 2012 con­test. And nearly three-quar­ters of Amer­ic­ans be­lieve that the coun­try is on the wrong track. (One wouldn’t even want to be an in­cum­bent mem­ber of Con­gress right now; just 31 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans told poll­sters they want their mem­ber of Con­gress reelec­ted, while 49 per­cent said they want someone new, ac­cord­ing to a United Tech­no­lo­gies/Na­tion­al Journ­al Con­gres­sion­al Con­nec­tion Poll re­leased this week.)

“The at­mo­spher­ics are work­ing for the Re­pub­lic­ans,” said Alex Gage, a GOP mi­cro-tar­get­ing ex­pert. Voters, he said, “are ret­ro­spect­ively mak­ing a judg­ment on the last three and a half years.”

Even as the GOP faces a con­ten­tious primary battle, the mood fa­vors Re­pub­lic­ans. But that primary fight has forged a non­tra­di­tion­al path to the nom­in­a­tion — one that by­passes tra­di­tion­al or­gan­iz­ing in early states and in­stead soars ahead with na­tion­al me­dia and tele­vised de­bates. Few can­did­ates are put­ting to­geth­er an or­gan­ized field team.

That de­cision can have con­sequences. Iowa, New Hamp­shire, Flor­ida, and Nevada — four of the first five nom­in­at­ing con­tests — are key swing states in Novem­ber. In 2008, when Obama and Hil­lary Rod­ham Clin­ton were fight­ing for the Demo­crat­ic nom­in­a­tion, Obama was forced to build or­gan­iz­a­tions in the late-primary states such as North Car­o­lina, In­di­ana, and Vir­gin­ia. Obama left those or­gan­iz­a­tions in place for the gen­er­al elec­tion, when he won states no Demo­crat had car­ried since 1964.

Today, while the GOP fights it out, Obama’s or­gan­iz­ing gap is as evid­ent as ever. In fact, his cam­paign has more staffers on the ground in Iowa than any Re­pub­lic­an cam­paign. “They’ve just de­cided not to do the grass­roots or­gan­iz­ing,” Obama cam­paign man­ager Jim Mess­ina said dur­ing a brief­ing with re­port­ers this week. “Their primary, they’re fight­ing mostly through the me­dia and de­bates.”

That leaves the state-by-state battle as the crit­ic­al rub­ber match. As I’ve men­tioned be­fore, Obama’s team has many op­tions as it pur­sues 270 elect­or­al votes. Mess­ina laid out sep­ar­ate scen­ari­os in which Obama could lose many key states and still hit 270 — a West­ern path to vic­tory, which he said Sens. Mi­chael Ben­net and Harry Re­id demon­strated with wins in 2010; a Mid­w­est plan, which in­cludes Rust Belt states that wouldn’t be happy with Rom­ney’s op­pos­i­tion to auto-in­dustry bail­outs; a South­ern plan, which fo­cuses on win­ning Vir­gin­ia and North Car­o­lina; and even a Flor­ida plan, which in­cludes the states that John Kerry won in 2004.

Obama’s team has learned from Demo­crat­ic mis­takes of the 1990s, when the party threw all of its re­sources at a few swing states. “Our goal is to not go back to the Flor­ida and Ohio days in stay­ing up un­til the middle of the night,” Mess­ina said. “All of our jobs [are] to have as many paths as we can.”

They’ll need them. Re­cent polls in key swing states such as Pennsylvania and Flor­ida show Obama lead­ing both Mitt Rom­ney and Newt Gin­grich, but by nar­row mar­gins. Polls taken as re­cently as last month show Re­pub­lic­ans ahead.

There are lay­ers to any pres­id­en­tial con­test. The 30,000-foot at­mo­spher­ics, like the state of the eco­nomy and views of the in­cum­bent, are work­ing against Obama. The 10,000-foot battle for a few swing states, in pur­suit of 270 elect­or­al votes, is dif­fi­cult but fa­vors the pres­id­ent. And at the mo­ment, Obama’s team has a big head start on the level closest to the ground, where his or­gan­iz­a­tion stands tallest (and, in many states, vir­tu­ally alone). Re­pub­lic­ans will work fast to build their own or­gan­iz­a­tion once the gen­er­al elec­tion rolls around, but early or­gan­iz­ing pays di­vidends in the end.

Re­pub­lic­ans may be win­ning the battle to define the race’s at­mo­spher­ics. But Obama’s team has a big head start in or­gan­iz­a­tion­al of­fense and a smal­ler, yet sig­ni­fic­ant, edge on Elect­or­al Col­lege de­fense. Don James would be proud.

What We're Following See More »
Trump’s Sanctuary Cities Order Blocked
11 hours ago
Dems Proposes Obamacare-for-Defense Deal
11 hours ago

"An emerging government funding deal would see Democrats agree to $15 billion in additional military funding in exchange for the GOP agreeing to fund healthcare subsidies, according to two congressional officials briefed on the talks. Facing a Friday deadline to pass a spending bill and avert a shutdown, Democrats are willing to go halfway to President Trump’s initial request of $30 billion in supplemental military funding."

Michael Flynn Remains A Russian-Sized Problem
12 hours ago

The Michael Flynn story is not going away for the White House as it tries to refocus its attention. The White House has denied requests from the House Oversight Committee for information and documents regarding payments that the former national security adviser received from Russian state television station RT and Russian firms. House Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz and ranking member Elijah Cummings also said that Flynn failed to report these payments on his security clearance application. White House legislative director Marc Short argued that the documents requested are either not in the possession of the White House or contain sensitive information he believes is not applicable to the committee's stated investigation.

Sally Yates to Testify on May 8
17 hours ago
U.S. To Conduct Exercises In Estonia
17 hours ago

The U.S. deployed "F-35 joint strike fighters" to Estonia on Tuesday. The "jets will stay in Estonia for several weeks and will be a part of training flights with U.S. and other NATO air forces." The move comes at a time of high tension between the U.S. and Estonia's neighbor, Russia. The two nations have been at odds over a number of issues recently, most of all being Vladimir Putin's support of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in light of Assad's chemical weapons attack on his own people in the midst of a civil war.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.