POLITICS

NRCC Runs Radio Ad Against Ross

Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
April 26, 2011, 3:10 a.m.

Busi­ness­man Don­ald Trump stopped by “Late Night” on 11/12.

Trump, on run­ning for pres­id­ent in ‘12: “Well, the word ‘run­ning’ is too strong. I’m think­ing about it for the first time in my life.”

More Trump: “I hate what’s hap­pen­ing to the coun­try. I hate what OPEC is do­ing to us. They’re just suck­ing the lifeblood out of us, and nobody is there to ne­go­ti­ate. Nobody is there to talk, and nobody is there to be tough. I hate what China is do­ing. You know, we’re re­build­ing China be­cause, I don’t want to say everything but a lot of the things that we make, we used to make product. We don’t make any­thing any­more. China makes it, and we are re­build­ing China. Now if some­body else did it, I would be happy. But nobody is step­ping for­ward. Nobody is say­ing what’s go­ing on. … So I hate see­ing what’s hap­pen­ing and so do a lot of oth­er people. So, I’m think­ing about it.”

NBC’s Fal­lon: “Well, good. If you are look­ing for a run­ning mate, I’m avail­able” (“Late Night,” NBC, 10/12).

The Gal­lup na­tion­al track­ing poll and vari­ous pub­lic and private polls con­duc­ted in Iowa in­dic­ate that the bloom is com­ing off former House Speak­er Newt Gin­grich’s rose, just as it did for Rep. Michele Bach­mann, Texas Gov. Rick Perry, and former God­fath­er’s Pizza CEO Her­man Cain be­fore him.

The most ideo­lo­gic­al two-thirds of the Re­pub­lic­an Party des­per­ately want a hard-char­ging, take-no-pris­on­ers con­ser­vat­ive mes­sen­ger as their nom­in­ee. They seem to be con­tinu­ally dis­ap­poin­ted.

In the five-night mov­ing av­er­age Gal­lup track of Re­pub­lic­ans na­tion­wide, for ex­ample, Gin­grich had peaked with 37 per­cent in the Dec. 1-5 track. He main­tained a 15-point lead over former Mas­sachu­setts Gov. Mitt Rom­ney, who had 22 per­cent at the time. All oth­er can­did­ates were in single di­gits.

Since then, the bom­bard­ment of cri­ti­cism from much of the Re­pub­lic­an and con­ser­vat­ive es­tab­lish­ment has fo­cused on Gin­grich. In Iowa, neg­at­ive ads from so-called “su­per PACs” al­lied with vari­ous op­pon­ents have trained their fire on him, tak­ing a heavy toll on the Geor­gi­an’s new­found sup­port.

In the Gal­lup na­tion­al track­ing poll re­leased on Monday af­ter­noon — con­duc­ted Dec. 13-18 — Gin­grich’s sup­port has dropped to 26 per­cent, with Rom­ney hold­ing in second place at 24 per­cent and Rep. Ron Paul of Texas run­ning third with 11 per­cent. Perry and Bach­mann, R-Minn., round out the field with 7 per­cent apiece. Former Sen. Rick San­tor­um, R-Pa., re­ceived 4 per­cent, and former Utah Gov. Jon Hunts­man picked up 2 per­cent.

A new CNN na­tion­al poll done Dec. 16-18 shows a sim­il­ar flat­ten­ing res­ult at the top — Gin­grich and Rom­ney tied with 28 per­cent each, Paul in third with 14 per­cent, Bach­mann next with 8 per­cent, fol­lowed by Perry at 7 per­cent, San­tor­um with 4 per­cent, and Hunts­man at 2 per­cent. Nine per­cent picked no one or had no opin­ion.

Note­worthy from that CNN sur­vey is the fact that when the 436 Re­pub­lic­ans in­ter­viewed were asked whom they would con­sider sup­port­ing (if they wer­en’t already) and whom they would not con­sider sup­port­ing, 43 per­cent said they would not con­sider sup­port­ing Paul, 42 per­cent could not back Bach­mann, 33 per­cent couldn’t go with Perry, and 24 per­cent saw Gin­grich as the no-fly zone; the low­est “couldn’t sup­port” of the five can­did­ates tested was Rom­ney — just 16 per­cent said they couldn’t back him.

Some 54 per­cent of those who didn’t pick Perry as their first choice said they would con­sider sup­port­ing him; Rom­ney was 2 points back with 52 per­cent; Bach­mann was second choice among 46 per­cent; Gin­grich was a backup for 44 per­cent; and Paul fin­ished last in that cat­egory with 39 per­cent.

This ques­tion is a good test of elasti­city — which can­did­ate has the abil­ity to ex­pand sup­port — and sug­gests that the talk that Rom­ney has a low ceil­ing, and bag­gage that pre­vents him from mov­ing fur­ther up, may be greatly ex­ag­ger­ated.

The one most re­cent pub­lic poll of 597 likely Iowa Re­pub­lic­an caucus at­tendees, con­duc­ted Dec. 16-18 (mar­gin of er­ror, +/- 4 per­cent) by the Demo­crat­ic-af­fil­i­ated firm Pub­lic Policy Polling, showed Paul hav­ing surged to 23 per­cent. It also had Rom­ney in second place with 20 per­cent and Gin­grich third with 14 per­cent.  Round­ing out the field were Bach­mann, Perry, and San­tor­um, each tied with 10 per­cent. Hunts­man was in sev­enth with 4 per­cent, with former New Mex­ico Gov. Gary John­son in last place with 2 per­cent. The re­main­ing 7 per­cent were un­de­cided or for someone else. Some in­siders doubt that Paul has surged that high, sug­gest­ing a flat­ter top to the race.

It would seem that the fo­cal point of at­tacks on Gin­grich is his lack of a real cam­paign ap­par­at­us com­pared to the or­gan­iz­a­tions of Paul or Rom­ney, both now and four years ago. Crit­ics also re­mark that Gin­grich lacks the more net­worked or­gan­iz­a­tion­al struc­ture. They ar­gue that he does not use, for ex­ample, the home-school net­work that former Arkan­sas Gov. Mike Hucka­bee painstak­ingly put to­geth­er four years ago.

Gin­grich is drop­ping par­tic­u­larly fast, un­able to fin­an­cially or or­gan­iz­a­tion­ally push back.

It seems that Paul has the best field or­gan­iz­a­tion. San­tor­um has com­mit­ted the most time to go­ing the most places — all 99 counties in Iowa as of a week or so ago. Bach­mann has her own cadre of pas­sion­ate back­ers. Rom­ney has a strong but low-pro­file struc­ture work­ing on his be­half as well. It is de­signed to max­im­ize per­form­ance, while min­im­iz­ing ex­pect­a­tions and risk.

Gin­grich had mo­mentum, but that now seems to be run­ning on va­pors.

My hunch is that the Iowa res­ults will be something of a muddle. If I had to bet on someone com­ing out on top it would prob­ably be Paul, a unique con­tender, but one who can draw very deep and in­tense sup­port. Yet, he has little po­ten­tial to broaden his reach, giv­en some of his more exot­ic po­s­i­tions. It’s not hard to find Re­pub­lic­ans who totally agree with one or two things he says. Once they are ex­posed to oth­er po­s­i­tions he has taken, though, they just as vehe­mently dis­agree. In a sev­en- or eight-way field, Paul can do fine. But as the field nar­rows and the fo­cus shifts onto him and his spe­cif­ic po­s­i­tions, his sup­port nat­ur­ally nar­rows.

If I were a con­tender for the Re­pub­lic­ans, I wouldn’t mind hav­ing the race nar­row down to two, with Paul be­ing the op­pos­ing can­did­ate. The ranks of Re­pub­lic­ans who are am­bi­val­ent about the killing of Osama bin Laden alone is a rar­efied group. An­oth­er four or five is­sues can nar­row it down to the small single di­gits.

There are no oth­er de­bates or sched­uled big events between now and the Jan. 3 Iowa caucuses. The hol­i­day sea­son ap­pro­pri­ately draws pub­lic at­ten­tion. The next two weeks ought to be a fairly quiet, stable peri­od, with noth­ing likely to shake things up un­til the caucuses are held.

The big ques­tion is wheth­er a polit­ic­ally and fin­an­cially vi­able al­tern­at­ive to Rom­ney emerges from Iowa. If Paul wins, giv­en the lack of elasti­city of his sup­port, the liber­tari­an’s vic­tory would be a very fa­vor­able out­come for Rom­ney. While the more con­ser­vat­ive wing of the GOP wants something more exot­ic than the former Mas­sachu­setts gov­ernor, they don’t want to go that far.

 

What We're Following See More »
MULVANEY, ROSS RUN INTO PROBLEMS
“Nanny-Gate” Redux for Republican Nominees
3 minutes ago
THE LATEST

Rep. Mick Mulvaney, President-elect Donald Trump's choice to run the Office of Management and Budget, admitted he "failed to pay more than $15,000 in payroll taxes for a household worker" from 2000-2004. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, noting that similar lapses have torpedoed Democratic nominees, said Mulvaney should withdraw. Meanwhile, Commerce secretary nominee Wilbur Ross "admitted at his Senate confirmation hearing Wednesday that he recently fired a household employee who could not provide proof that they could legally work in the country."

Source:
PAYMENTS TO HACKERS?
Feds Looking into Possible Russian Cash to Help Trump Campaign
15 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

Since last spring, "the FBI and five other law enforcement and intelligence agencies have collaborated" in investigating possible Russian attempts to influence the November election." The inquiries include looking into whether the Kremlin may have paid email hackers in the United States, either directly or via intermediaries. "The agencies involved in the inquiry are the FBI, the CIA, the National Security Agency, the Justice Department, the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network and representatives of the director of national intelligence, the sources said."

Source:
FULL SENATE CAN TAKE UP IMMEDIATELY
Mattis Clears Senate Armed Services Committee
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The Senate Armed Services Committee on Wednesday cleared one of the final hurdles for retired Gen. James Mattis to become defense secretary shortly after President-elect Trump takes office. The committee voted 26-1 that the full Senate should approve the nomination once it's received."

Source:
APPARENT BREAK WITH TRUMP
Scott Pruitt: Climate Change Not a Hoax
5 hours ago
THE LATEST
WOULD RENEGOTIATE NAFTA
Ross Says He Prefers Bilateral Trade Deals
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

Wilbur Ross, President-elect Donald Trump’s pick for Commerce Secretary, told the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation this morning that he favors bilateral trade deals, as opposed to multilateral deals like the Trans-Pacific Partnership. "I am not anti-trade. I am pro-trade," Ross said. "But I'm pro sensible trade—not pro trade that is to the disadvantage of the American worker and the American manufacturing community." He said he agrees with Trump that NAFTA should be renegotiated.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login