Politics: White House

Laughs from the WH Correspondents’ Dinner

Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
April 28, 2011, 5:07 p.m.

NJ Gov. Chris Christie (R) “was something of an all-star” when he walked in­to a small GOP cam­paign of­fice in Wil­li­am­s­port, PA, “to the cheers of about 75 people.” Christie was there to cam­paign for PA AG/GOV nom­in­ee Tom Corbett (R), who, like Christie, is an ex-U.S. atty.

Corbett has been lead­ing in the polls against Al­legheny Co. Ex­ec. Dan Otor­ano (D), but “Christie was the main at­trac­tion at this event,” where loc­als fa­mil­i­ar with the tough-talk­ing, Jer­sey guy gov. from cable news shows and vir­al in­ter­net videos “rushed to shake his hand.” Many thought should run for WH ‘12, “no mat­ter how many times he says he’s not in­ter­ested.”

The rally was the latest stop for Christie, who has spent much of the last month on the stump to drum up pub­li­city and raise money for GOP can­did­ates across the coun­try. Talk of Christie as a WH ‘12 con­tender “has only grown with his travels.” On 10/8, con­ser­vat­ive au­thor Ann Coulter “joined the chor­us,” say­ing Christie has to run for WH ‘12 “for his coun­try.”

In his speech, Christie avoided the top­ic, fo­cus­ing in­stead on his battles with NJ Dems and com­par­ing Corbett’s cam­paign against Onor­ato to his ‘09 cam­paign against ex-NJ Gov. Jon Corz­ine (D), whom he re­peatedly de­scribed as “des­per­ate.” Christie: “When you get the op­por­tun­ity to lead, folks like Tom and I know how to grab the reins and lead” (Fried­man, Ne­wark Star-Ledger, 10/12).

Seni­or Re­pub­lic­ans may be un­will­ing to pub­licly call the pres­id­en­tial nom­in­at­ing cam­paign fin­ished, but the con­sensus is that Mitt Rom­ney will be the party’s can­did­ate against Pres­id­ent Obama later this year. As Rom­ney works to­ward the 1,144 del­eg­ates he needs to form­ally lock up his party’s nom­in­a­tion, an­oth­er, far less form­al and far more se­cret­ive cam­paign is get­ting un­der way — the cam­paign to be­come Rom­ney’s vice pres­id­en­tial run­ning mate.

None of the can­did­ates jock­ey­ing in this second con­test will ad­mit pub­licly that they want the job. In­stead, their ad­visers and fans are work­ing di­li­gently to make the case to Rom­ney’s team, to put their can­did­ates in a po­s­i­tion to im­press the nom­in­ee and to be ready to an­swer if and when Rom­ney calls their name.

A hand­ful of these can­did­ates’ ad­visers and sup­port­ers, who spoke on the con­di­tion of an­onym­ity in or­der to share de­tails of a pro­cess usu­ally con­duc­ted be­hind closed doors, de­scribed three areas of fo­cus:

— Can­did­ates must stake out policy ter­rit­ory they can call their own be­fore vice pres­id­en­tial spec­u­la­tion col­ors any move they make.

— They must mas­ter of a wide range of policy po­s­i­tions, in or­der to pre­pare for the harsh glare of the na­tion­al spot­light (“We’re not go­ing to have a Rick Perry situ­ation,” said one ad­viser to a po­ten­tial vice pres­id­en­tial short-lister).

— They must make the case that they have something to bring to the table, wheth­er through their ap­peal to spe­cif­ic geo­graph­ic or elect­or­al groups or through their sheer work eth­ic.

Re­pub­lic­ans, in­clud­ing those in Rom­ney’s camp, don’t be­lieve the 2012 elec­tion will be de­cided by such a nar­row mar­gin that the vice pres­id­en­tial se­lec­tion would make the win­ning dif­fer­ence. And they cer­tainly don’t see them­selves run­ning so far be­hind that, like Sen. John Mc­Cain in 2008, they feel forced to pick someone so far out­side the main­stream that he or she provides an op­por­tun­ity to shake up the race. That would seem to ar­gue for a safe pick, someone who con­veys a sense of sta­bil­ity and se­cur­ity, with maybe a little polit­ic­al be­ne­fit on the side.

At the same time, that sense does not au­gur well for any long shots hop­ing to be scooped up from well out­side the es­tab­lish­ment. Burned by Sarah Pal­in in 2008 and in­formed by Perry’s harsh in­tro­duc­tion to the na­tion­al stage, mem­bers of Wash­ing­ton’s Re­pub­lic­an es­tab­lish­ment will urge Rom­ney to pick someone who, above all, will do no harm.

Sev­er­al prom­in­ent Rom­ney sur­rog­ates are widely seen as po­ten­tial vice pres­id­en­tial nom­in­ees. Rom­ney has traveled ex­tens­ively through Iowa and New Hamp­shire with New Jer­sey Gov. Chris Christie, something aides to oth­er po­ten­tial can­did­ates have noted with jeal­ousy. Christie, a rising star in the Re­pub­lic­an Party, ser­i­ously con­tem­plated run­ning for pres­id­ent. And he has said he would ac­cept his party’s vice pres­id­en­tial nom­in­a­tion if Rom­ney came call­ing, an ob­vi­ous, but sur­pris­ingly rare, ad­mis­sion in a back­room race fre­quently marked by false mod­esty.

At the height of former House Speak­er Newt Gin­grich’s rise to the top of the GOP field, Rom­ney rolled out an en­dorse­ment from South Dakota Sen. John Thune, a con­ser­vat­ive well-known to Iowa Re­pub­lic­ans. Thune ad­visers say privately that the nod proved crit­ic­al to Rom­ney’s caucus vic­tory (then again, fol­low­ing an eight-vote win in Iowa, any­one who en­dorsed Rom­ney gets to claim cred­it for his vic­tory). Thune has also staked out bona fides on for­eign policy; as a mem­ber of Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship, he spear­headed the GOP’s po­s­i­tion on the START Treaty earli­er this year.

Vir­gin­ia Gov. Bob Mc­Don­nell has not form­ally en­dorsed Rom­ney, though he has hin­ted strongly that he will vote for Rom­ney in Vir­gin­ia’s March 6 primary. But as head of the Re­pub­lic­an Gov­ernors As­so­ci­ation, a post that helped launch Rom­ney as a na­tion­al can­did­ate in 2006, Mc­Don­nell has built him­self a fol­low­ing among con­ser­vat­ive circles. He has traveled to New Hamp­shire, and he’ll be in South Car­o­lina this week­end, trips that are dif­fi­cult to see as any­thing oth­er than aimed at boost­ing his na­tion­al pres­ence. And Mc­Don­nell is re­ceiv­ing oc­ca­sion­al brief­ings to bet­ter ac­quaint him­self with is­sues he doesn’t or­din­ar­ily deal with, a top ad­viser said.

Per­haps the biggest ele­phant in the room is also the young­est — Sen. Marco Ru­bio, the Flor­ida con­ser­vat­ive whose pres­ence on the na­tion­al scene has some Re­pub­lic­ans hop­ing they can re­pair dam­aged re­la­tions with His­pan­ic voters. Ru­bio’s ad­visers in­sist he is neither in­ter­ested nor ex­pect­ing to be asked, but they have put him in a po­s­i­tion to make the list.

Ru­bio has worked to es­tab­lish him­self as a com­mu­nic­at­or of the GOP’s na­tion­al mes­sage, and un­til Rom­ney picks a run­ning mate, everything Ru­bio does will be viewed through the prism of a po­ten­tial vice pres­id­en­tial can­did­acy, his ad­visers re­cog­nize. They con­sciously sought to carve out Ru­bio’s own areas of policy ex­pert­ise last year, in areas like hu­man traf­fick­ing and gov­ern­ment spend­ing (he sent a let­ter to Pres­id­ent Obama last week that got more press at­ten­tion than a sim­il­ar missive from any oth­er sen­at­or would have re­ceived), so that he could more cred­ibly ar­gue that not every ac­tion was driv­en by a lust for high­er of­fice.

Ru­bio’s aides zeal­ously guard his im­age and repu­ta­tion. Once in of­fice, Ru­bio’s emer­gence onto the na­tion­al scene was handled as care­fully as Hil­lary Clin­ton’s or Barack Obama’s, the two celebrity sen­at­ors who wanted to both take ad­vant­age of their star­dom and es­tab­lish good work­ing re­la­tion­ships in a cham­ber rich in tra­di­tion and un­kind to­ward young up­starts who haven’t paid their sen­at­ori­al dues. Any chal­lenge to Ru­bio’s fam­ily his­tory, a cent­ral part of his ap­peal to an even­tu­al na­tion­al audi­ence, meets with a harsh re­sponse from a team of com­mu­nic­a­tions and polit­ic­al ad­visers who are far more ex­per­i­enced than the av­er­age fresh­man sen­at­or.

Oth­er names will make the rounds as fla­vors of the month. Rep. Paul Ry­an’s budget pro­pos­al gave Rom­ney the chance to dis­tin­guish him­self from Gin­grich, and Ry­an is a su­per­star among con­ser­vat­ive elites who will back Rom­ney only be­cause they fear the rest of the GOP field (a re­cent re­port by a Wis­con­sin news­pa­per that state law would al­low Ry­an to run for both Con­gress and the vice pres­id­ency raised a few eye­brows). Ohio Sen. Rob Port­man is men­tioned oc­ca­sion­ally, though there is little evid­ence he is overtly pre­par­ing for a role so soon after win­ning elec­tion to the up­per cham­ber.

Some Re­pub­lic­ans even point to Susana Mar­tinez, the first-term gov­ernor of New Mex­ico; they note with in­terest that Mar­tinez has at­ten­ded sev­er­al Re­pub­lic­an Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee meet­ings, an un­usu­al ef­fort for someone so new to of­fice. Mar­tinez told a loc­al news­pa­per re­port­er last week she isn’t in­ter­ested in the job.

Of Rom­ney’s rivals, few seem to be in a po­s­i­tion to com­mand real at­ten­tion as a po­ten­tial front-run­ner. Gin­grich has openly ad­mit­ted he would not fit in as someone’s un­der­ling, and the an­im­os­ity among Rom­ney, Perry, and Rick San­tor­um is evid­ent. Only one erstwhile rival — ex-Min­nesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty — is a pos­sib­il­ity. Pawlenty has joined a num­ber of cor­por­ate boards that ad­visers note he can eas­ily quit if Rom­ney comes call­ing. But Pawlenty feels burned by the pres­id­en­tial pro­cess, a top aide said. He’s more in­ter­ested in be­ing con­sidered for a Cab­in­et post in an even­tu­al Re­pub­lic­an ad­min­is­tra­tion.

Re­gard­less of wheth­er their fa­vor­ites want the job as Rom­ney’s No. 2 or not, top aides to each po­ten­tial can­did­ate re­cog­nize they might be in­cluded on either a long list of can­did­ates tapped for ap­pear­ance or out of cour­tesy, or on a much short­er list from which Rom­ney will choose his ac­tu­al run­ning mate. Without the pre­par­a­tion ne­ces­sary to ap­pear cred­ible, a can­did­ate’s chances may be dis­missed now, and di­min­ished in the long run.

And though it re­mains un­couth to be seen as openly cam­paign­ing for the job, the jock­ey­ing has most cer­tainly be­gun — even be­fore Rom­ney form­ally locks up the right to pick a can­did­ate.

What We're Following See More »
Niger Attack Possible Terrorist Set-Up
3 hours ago

"An emerging theory among U.S. military investigators is that the Army Special Forces soldiers ambushed in Niger were set up by terrorists, who were tipped off in advance about a meeting in a village sympathetic to local ISIS affiliates...The group of American Green Berets and support soldiers had requested a meeting with elders of a village that was seen as supportive of the Islamic State, and they attended the meeting at around 11 a.m. local time Oct. 4...Such meetings are a routine part of the Green Beret mission, but it wasn't clear whether this meeting was part of the unit's plan."

Bergdahl’s Sentencing Delayed Until Wednesday
3 hours ago

"The long-awaited sentencing of Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl was delayed Monday after a legal battle erupted over the word 'but' in President Donald Trump's most recent remarks about the case. Bergdahl's defense team argued that their client could not get a fair shake from the court because Trump, during a Rose Garden appearance on Oct. 16, at first said he couldn't talk about the case and then added: 'But I think people have heard my comments in the past.'" Trump has called him a traitor and suggested he should be executed.

Pentagon to Scrub Kaspersky from Its Systems
5 hours ago
Trump Admin to Kill Boeing Sales to Iran
7 hours ago

"The Trump administration is coming under increased pressure from Congress to kill a landmark deal between Boeing and an Iranian airline known for engaging in terrorism over concerns the Western airline company would enable Tehran's transfer of militant fighters across the region, according to multiple sources, who told the Washington Free Beacon the administration is likely to nix the multi-billion dollar deal. The Obama administration's nuclear agreement with Iran paved the way for U.S. aerospace corporation Boeing to ink a deal with Iran's state-controlled airline, Iran Air, which was recently caught using its commercial planes to ferry Iranian militants to regional hotspots."

Mueller Investigating Tony Podesta and His Firm
12 hours ago

"Tony Podesta and the Podesta Group are now the subjects of a federal investigation being led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, three sources with knowledge of the matter told NBC News. The probe of Podesta and his Democratic-leaning lobbying firm grew out of Mueller's inquiry into the finances of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.