Politics: White House

N2K: White House is Wary of Retaliation

Add to Briefcase
May 3, 2011, 3:18 p.m.

‘02 can­did­ate/Sec/State Elaine Mar­shall (D) and Sen. Richard Burr (R) “offered com­pet­ing vis­ions” in a 10/11 de­bate” (AP, 10/11). Mar­shall and Burr “sharply” dis­agreed “on the new health care law, on drilling off the state’s coast and on which party was re­spons­ible for the na­tion­al debt.”

Want More On This Race? Check out the Hot­line Dash­board for a com­pre­hens­ive run­down of this race, in­clud­ing stor­ies, polls, ads, FEC num­bers, and more!

Mar­shall “most of­ten played the role of the ag­gressor, por­tray­ing” Burr “as a polit­ic­al in­sider” and “at­tempt­ing to tie him to pub­lic dis­con­tent” with Wash­ing­ton. Mar­shall: “Wash­ing­ton is not re­spond­ing to the needs of or­din­ary Amer­ic­ans. Sen­at­or Burr has been in Wash­ing­ton for 16 years and is part of that club.”

Burr: “If you be­lieve our gov­ern­ment has to be downs­ized and we need to fig­ure out how to get more bang for our buck, then I’m ask­ing for your sup­port” (Christensen, Raleigh News & Ob­serv­er, 10/12).

Burr “blamed un­pre­dict­able taxes and reg­u­la­tion for stunt­ing the na­tion’s nas­cent eco­nom­ic re­cov­ery.”

Burr: “Let’s make tax rates and reg­u­la­tion pre­dict­able. Let’s give private cap­it­al a reas­on to come in­to the mar­ket­place and ex­pand busi­ness and to cre­ate jobs.”

Mar­shall “laid out a dif­fer­ent vis­ion, sug­gest­ing the na­tion should be of­fer­ing tax cred­its for cre­at­ing jobs.” Mar­shall: “We’ve got to help small busi­nesses. We’ve got to help provide the cred­it they need so that they can cre­ate the jobs that we need” (Baker, AP, 10/12).

Both “re­frained from of­fer­ing many spe­cif­ics in” the “hour long de­bate that touched on a broad range of sub­jects” (Win­ston-Salem Journ­al, 10/12).

Early Bird Gets The Votes

Early vot­ing “has altered the dy­nam­ics of polit­ic­al cam­paign” as they’ve “gone from gear­ing up for vot­ing day” to gear­ing up for “vot­ing sea­son.” In ‘08, Dems en­joyed an ad­vant­age in early vot­ing, but “that prob­ably re­flects” bet­ter Dem or­gan­iz­a­tion rather than “an in­her­ent par­tis­an tilt to early vot­ing it­self.” In NC, early vot­ing is set to be­gin in ‘10 on 10/14.

Ohio State prof. Daniel Tokaji: “It’s ab­so­lutely changed things and it’s go­ing to change things in the fu­ture. It has to change the way cam­paigns are run. Cam­paigns are go­ing to have to tar­get voters earli­er than they did in the past.”

NC Dem chair An­drew Whalen: “Once early vot­ing starts, I think we’re go­ing to see more Demo­crats come out and mo­mentum build right through to Elec­tion Day” (Mor­rill, Char­lotte Ob­serv­er, 10/12).

Not Down, Not Out

Mar­shall “trails Burr by more than 10 per­cent­age points in re­cent polls” but “told sup­port­ers that the race can still be win.” Mar­shall: “It is a win­nable race. I don’t spend a lot of time wor­ry­ing about polls. … This race is about jobs. It’s about people, and it’s about jobs. That’s where we’re go­ing to win” (Fay­ettes­ville Ob­serv­er Times, 10/12).

Proxy Vote

Burr “likes to stay away from the hot but­ton so­cial is­sues” so “when he traveled to Green­ville over the week­end,” it was “up to” Rep. Wal­ter Jones (R-03) who is “a fa­vor­ite of so­cial con­ser­vat­ives” to “re­mind voters that Burr op­poses abor­tion and op­poses same-sex mar­riage.”

Jones: “(Burr) be­lieves as you be­lieve, and I be­lieve that mar­riage is between a man and a wo­man. … He shares my be­lief that a child is a gift from God and that ought to be part of the de­bate — pro­tect­ing God’s gift to wo­men” (Christensen, “Un­der The Dome,” Raleigh News & Ob­serv­er, 10/11).

What hap­pens in an elec­tion when two can­did­ates who are un­elect­able run against each oth­er in the fall? We are about to test that pro­pos­i­tion.

The Flor­ida primary is now in the re­cord books, and Mitt Rom­ney walked away with a big win, money in the bank, and a good deal of mo­mentum. He is now the true front-run­ner in the race for the Re­pub­lic­an nom­in­a­tion, and by the sound of his speech after he won Flor­ida (and in homage to the Face­book ini­tial pub­lic of­fer­ing), he looked like he was launch­ing his gen­er­al-elec­tion IPO. So, with the un­der­stand­ing that the Re­pub­lic­an primary cam­paign could still take a few twists and turns, let’s look for­ward to the gen­er­al elec­tion.

After a bruis­ing neg­at­ive cam­paign that be­came con­sid­er­ably bit­ter and per­son­al, Rom­ney is now down to his low­est fa­vor­ab­il­ity rat­ing ever among the key vot­ing group of in­de­pend­ents. In the latest ABC News/Wash­ing­ton Post polling, 51 per­cent of in­de­pend­ents rate Rom­ney un­fa­vor­ably and only 23 per­cent view him fa­vor­ably—a whop­ping net-neg­at­ive rat­ing of 28 per­cent­age points. A can­did­ate in this ter­rit­ory can’t win in a nor­mal gen­er­al elec­tion.

Pres­id­ent Obama also faces bleak pro­spects. His ap­prov­al rat­ing (which his­tory shows is a pretty good in­dic­at­or of the vote he would draw on Elec­tion Day) is 42 per­cent among in­de­pend­ent voters. That is a num­ber that wouldn’t win a pres­id­ent reelec­tion in nor­mal times. Add to that low con­sumer-con­fid­ence num­bers, high un­em­ploy­ment, and the large per­cent­age of people who say that the coun­try is headed in the wrong dir­ec­tion, and you wouldn’t put much money on the in­cum­bent.

But someone has to win, and in the spring of 1992, a sim­il­ar situ­ation de­veloped. Bill Clin­ton emerged battered and bruised from the Demo­crat­ic primary race with a large num­ber of voters view­ing him un­fa­vor­ably, and the in­cum­bent pres­id­ent was un­elect­able when you looked at his job-ap­prov­al num­bers. So Ross Perot ap­peared and ac­tu­ally led some na­tion­al polls un­til he showed he wasn’t ready for prime time. Clin­ton uni­fied his party at the Demo­crat­ic con­ven­tion in New York City, and then nev­er trailed.

In a race between two the­or­et­ic­ally un­elect­able can­did­ates, any­thing is pos­sible. Could a third-party can­did­ate emerge? Yes. Could Rom­ney uni­fy the Re­pub­lic­ans? Very pos­sible. Could Obama get a lift from an im­prov­ing eco­nomy? Sure.

We won’t know any of those an­swers for quite a while, but it is sure go­ing to be fun to watch this con­test un­fold.

What We're Following See More »
CONFIRMATION SHOULD BE SWIFT
Ambassador Nominee: Russia Meddled in Election
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"President Donald Trump’s nominee to be ambassador to Russia was unequivocal Tuesday in calling out the federation’s interference in the 2016 election in the United States. 'There is no question—underline no question—that the Russian government interfered in the U.S. election last year, and Moscow continues to meddle in the democratic processes of our friends and allies,' Jon Huntsman Jr., told the Foreign Relations Committee."

Source:
AT U.N. TRUMP CALLS NUCLEAR DEAL AN “EMBARRASSMENT”
New Iran Policy Coming Next Month?
6 hours ago
THE LATEST
WILL NOW SUBPOENA HIM
Senate Intel Committee Cancels Cohen Meeting
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS
“MASSIVE SOURCE OF EMBARRASSMENT”
Trump Calls Out U.N. Members for Human Rights Violations
7 hours ago
THE LATEST
LEVELS AN IMPLICIT THREAT AT NORTH KOREA
Trump Calls Kim “Rocket Man” at U.N.
7 hours ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login