Politics: White House

Obama Speaks to Firefighters in New York City on His Way to Ground Zero

Add to Briefcase
May 5, 2011, 9:01 a.m.

NV Gov. Jim Gib­bons (R) said 10/6 “he is still in pain and re­cov­er­ing from a broken pel­vis but that he is con­duct­ing state busi­ness while in re­hab­il­it­a­tion.” Gib­bons: “It’s one of the more pain­ful breaks you can have. I re­com­mend against it.”

Still, Gib­bons “said the in­jury isn’t pre­vent­ing him from con­duct­ing state busi­ness.” Gib­bon: “Oth­er than that, we’re car­ry­ing on the func­tions of gov­ern­ment every morn­ing.”

For this reas­on, Gib­bons “has to be very se­lect­ive about tak­ing paink­illers that dull the senses and reas­on­ing powers.” Gib­bons: “We make no de­cisions when there is pain medi­cine in­volved.” After he con­ducts busi­ness and “when he starts ther­apy, he said the pain pills are ne­ces­sary ‘to al­low your muscles to start work­ing.’”

Gib­bons, on horse ac­ci­dent: “I got one foot in the left stir­rup but when I reached up and grabbed the horn and pulled my­self up, it spooked her. She came out of that chute at 100 miles an hour and I still only had one leg in the stir­rup.” Gib­bons “said there was no way to get con­trol of the horse ‘so I de­cided to exit the horse.’” The horse then “kicked him in the stom­ach, caus­ing some in­tern­al bleed­ing to add to his in­jur­ies.”

He con­ten­ded “his pre-sur­gery X-rays showed the two halves of the pel­vic arch nearly 4 inches apart,” and doc­tors “in­ser­ted two 10 inch long bolts and fixed the pel­vic arch with a plate and sev­er­al more screws.”

Gib­bons: “My goal is to put that same saddle back on that same horse and ride. My goal is to fin­ish what I star­ted that day and, in the mean­time, I’m go­ing to fin­ish what I star­ted four years ago - mov­ing Nevada for­ward.”

More Gib­bons, on be­ing in a wheel­chair “for up to eight weeks”: “I’m go­ing to get red and blue lights and a siren on this thing” (Dor­nan, Car­son City Nevada Ap­peal, 10/10).

Last Fri­day’s drop in the un­em­ploy­ment rate from 8.5 to 8.3 per­cent marked the fifth con­sec­ut­ive month of de­clines in the job­less rate. This de­cline adds to a grow­ing body of evid­ence that there are some subtle but im­port­ant shift­ing sands in the 2012 elec­tion. The broad­er “U-6” in­dex adds up the per­cent­age of un­em­ployed people with those work­ing part-time who want full-time work, and with those who have giv­en up look­ing at all. This num­ber has dropped for four con­sec­ut­ive months from 16.4 per­cent in Septem­ber to 15.1 per­cent today. It is still a hor­rific­ally high rate but headed in the right dir­ec­tion. As the eco­nom­ic-con­sult­ing firm ISI Group has noted, last week marked the 18th con­sec­ut­ive week of more pos­it­ive than neg­at­ive eco­nom­ic news. As a res­ult, polls show an in­crease in the num­ber of Amer­ic­ans say­ing the coun­try is headed in the right dir­ec­tion, while the num­ber of those who say it is off on the wrong track are in de­cline.

Un­ques­tion­ably, there are a lot of eco­nom­ic dangers ahead, not the least of which is the like­li­hood of a re­ces­sion — and pos­sible fin­an­cial crisis — in Europe. Be­cause of this, many eco­nom­ists add a great deal of cau­tion to what little op­tim­ism they have. But the pub­lic is re­act­ing some­what less guardedly, with con­sumer-con­fid­ence rat­ings run­ning at their highest levels since May and with a bit of an up­tick in Pres­id­ent Obama’s job-ap­prov­al rat­ings. There were 23 con­sec­ut­ive weeks of Gal­lup weekly job-ap­prov­al rat­ings run­ning 44 per­cent or less since the week of Ju­ly 11-17. His ap­prov­al has now run 45 per­cent or high­er for six out of the last sev­en weeks. This past week’s (Jan. 30-Feb. 5) ap­prov­al rat­ing of 46 per­cent, with 47 per­cent dis­ap­prov­al, is still “un­der­wa­ter,” as poll­sters say. It does, though, re­flect a dif­fer­ent pat­tern than what had ex­is­ted since mid­sum­mer.

But the volat­il­ity that we have seen in the last three elec­tions still very much ex­ists: This is a very un­stable polit­ic­al cli­mate. One way of look­ing at it is that the fa­vor­ab­il­ity rat­ings of the Demo­crat­ic Party and Demo­crats in Con­gress are lousy, but those of the Re­pub­lic­an Party and Re­pub­lic­ans in Con­gress are even worse. Re­pub­lic­ans need to keep a close eye on the gen­er­ic con­gres­sion­al bal­lot. An as­sort­ment of firms — par­tis­an and in­de­pend­ent — and joint bi­par­tis­an polling ef­forts are show­ing an un­usu­ally wide range of read­ings on the gen­er­ic bal­lot test. Demo­crats are ahead by any­where from a stat­ist­ic­ally in­sig­ni­fic­ant 1 point in the Politico/GWU/Battle­ground poll, by the Re­pub­lic­an firm the Tar­rance Group and Demo­crat­ic firm Lake Re­search Part­ners, to a whop­ping 11-point mar­gin in the United Tech­no­lo­gies/Na­tion­al Journ­al Con­gres­sion­al Con­nec­tion Poll. Even the Rasmussen Re­ports poll, which al­most nev­er has Demo­crats ahead on the gen­er­ic, re­cently put Demo­crats in front by a point.

My hunch is that the real­ity lies some­where in between. It is around the 3-point Demo­crat­ic ad­vant­age in the Demo­cracy Corps sur­vey, con­duc­ted by Demo­crat­ic poll­ster Stan Green­berg and strategist James Carville (which ac­tu­ally names the in­cum­bents in each race), and a 6-point ad­vant­age in the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journ­al sur­vey, con­duc­ted by Demo­crat Peter Hart and Re­pub­lic­an Bill McIn­turff. Over the years, there seems to be a de­fault Demo­crat­ic ad­vant­age of maybe 3 points. But we are see­ing more cred­ible pub­lic and private polls com­ing in above that mar­gin than be­low. This may or may not be a trend. But polling also shows that there are con­sid­er­able weak­nesses in the Re­pub­lic­an mes­sage. In­de­pend­ents are un­happy with Pres­id­ent Obama and/or Demo­crats. At the same time, they are show­ing in­creased skep­ti­cism with the GOP mes­saging.

As it grows more ap­par­ent that former Mas­sachu­setts Gov. Mitt Rom­ney will be the Re­pub­lic­an nom­in­ee, he pre­sum­ably will have free­dom to start down­shift­ing his rhet­or­ic a bit and fo­cus­ing more on in­de­pend­ents. But he would do so with a con­ser­vat­ive base that is already highly sus­pi­cious of him, so he may have to make that shift from a nom­in­a­tion cam­paign to a gen­er­al-elec­tion cam­paign slower than oth­er­wise might be the case. Rom­ney also might have to take a longer time be­fore earn­estly pur­su­ing in­de­pend­ent voters.

In short, this cam­paign is at a new and dif­fer­ent place: The odds of it be­ing a very close race have gone up. A lot of Demo­crats didn’t want to ad­mit how much of an up­hill battle Obama faced for much of last year, but he really did. Now, sig­nals are more con­flict­ing. Many GOP strategists ex­press con­cern that the situ­ation has gone from one in which they were cau­tiously op­tim­ist­ic to one of un­cer­tainty as to where it is headed. That sounds right to me.

What We're Following See More »
Nine Senate Republicans Vote Against BRCA
10 hours ago
Manafort Testifies in Closed Session
10 hours ago

"Paul Manafort, who served as a top aide to President Trump’s 2016 campaign, on Tuesday provided congressional investigators notes he took during a Trump Tower meeting with a Russian lawyer that has emerged as a focus in the investigation of Russian interference in the election. Manafort’s submission, which came as he was interviewed in a closed session by staff members for the Senate Intelligence Committee, could offer a key contemporaneous account of the June 2016 session."

Senate Will Debate House Bill
17 hours ago

By the narrowest of margins, the Senate voted 51-50 this afternoon to begin debate on the House's legislation to repeal and replace Obamacare. Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins defected from the GOP, but Vice President Pence broke a tie. Sen. John McCain returned from brain surgery to cast his vote.

Republicans Reach 50 Votes to Proceed on Health Bill
17 hours ago
House Russia Probe: Kushner “Satisfied” Questions
18 hours ago

"Republicans who interviewed Jared Kushner for more than three hours in the House’s Russia probe on Tuesday said the president’s son-in-law and adviser came across as candid and cooperative. 'His answers were forthcoming and complete. He satisfied all my questions,' said Rep. Mike Conaway (R-Texas), who’s leading the House Intelligence Committee’s investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, including possible collusion between Moscow and the Trump campaign."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.