Need-to-Know Video

For the Hispanic Vote, Immigration Reform Might be the Wrong Track

Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
May 9, 2011, 2:08 p.m.

A cn|2 poll; con­duc­ted 10/4-6 by Braun Re­search; sur­veyed 826 LVs; mar­gin of er­ror +/- 3.4% (re­lease, 10/8).

Obama As POTUS

- All Men Wom 9/1 8/18 7/21 Ap­prove 37% 35% 39% 43% 40% 41% Dis­ap­prove 60 64 57 54 58 56

Which Party Would You Rather See In Charge Of Con­gress After The Nov. Elec­tion?

- All Men Wom 9/1 GOP­ers 47% 52% 43% 45% Dems 37 35 40 37 Neither 6 7 5 9 Un­dec 9 7 11 9

(For more from this poll, please see today’s KY SEN story.)

The cur­rent spike in gas­ol­ine prices and the flap over the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s pro­posed re­quire­ment that re­li­giously af­fil­i­ated in­sti­tu­tions provide their em­ploy­ees health in­sur­ance cov­er­ing con­tra­cep­tion are use­ful re­mind­ers that eco­nom­ics and polit­ics are both dy­nam­ic, not stat­ic. It’s al­ways risky to pro­ject that the status quo will hold, par­tic­u­larly when an elec­tion is more than eight months away.

There’s no ques­tion that the eco­nom­ic num­bers over the past five months have been sig­ni­fic­antly bet­ter than they were in the first nine months of 2011. They’ve ris­en from a level at which any pres­id­ent would have a dif­fi­cult time get­ting reelec­ted to one that sug­gests this might be a com­pet­it­ive race that could go either way. But those num­bers are in the ab­stract. The 30-cent surge in gas­ol­ine prices in re­cent months is largely at­trib­ut­able to polit­ic­al in­stabil­ity in Ir­an and else­where in the Middle East, and it is something that av­er­age voters can see, feel, touch, and hate. Don’t be sur­prised to see an­ger start bub­bling up any­time now.

It’s any­one’s guess where the eco­nomy, un­em­ploy­ment, and gas prices will be this sum­mer. We should be mind­ful of the fluid­ity of eco­nom­ic news, good or bad. Things (oth­er than gas­ol­ine prices) look bet­ter now than they did four months ago, but what will they look like four or eight months from now? Will Europe fall in­to a re­ces­sion? Will there be a col­lapse of ma­jor fin­an­cial in­sti­tu­tions in the euro­zone? These are very big ques­tions that can­not be answered now.

Even the smartest eco­nom­ists dis­agree about the eco­nom­ic out­look.

Sim­il­arly, con­tro­ver­sies can pop up lit­er­ally overnight, al­ter­ing how we per­ceive the polit­ic­al and eco­nom­ic ter­rain. Pres­id­ent Obama’s fum­bling of the con­tra­cep­tion is­sue last week — end­ing in a com­prom­ise that should have been his ad­min­is­tra­tion’s start­ing po­s­i­tion — stole head­lines from very pro-mis­ing job news. The Bur­eau of Labor Stat­ist­ics re­por­ted a drop in ini­tial un­em­ploy­ment claims, and its Job Open­ings and Labor Turnover Study sur­vey showed there were 3.4 mil­lion job open­ings na­tion­wide on the last day of Decem­ber 2011, com­pared with 3.1 mil­lion on the last day of Novem­ber. These great stor­ies for the White House got stepped on by the con­tra­cep­tion fight.

Even the smartest eco­nom­ists in the coun­try dis­agree about the U.S. eco­nom­ic out­look. In Feb­ru­ary’s Blue Chip Eco­nom­ic In­dic­at­ors sur­vey of 56 top eco­nom­ists, the con­sensus fore­cast for 2012 was that gross do­mest­ic product would grow at 2.1 per­cent in the first quarter (down from 2.8 per­cent in the fourth quarter of 2011), then edge up to 2.2 per­cent in the second quarter, 2.4 per­cent in the third, and 2.6 per­cent in the fourth. In terms of un­em­ploy­ment, the con­sensus pro­jec­tion was an 8.4 per­cent av­er­age rate for the first quarter (0.1 per­cent above Janu­ary’s rate), then 8.3 per­cent in the second quarter, 8.2 per­cent in the third, and 8.1 per­cent in the fourth.

In my view, if the over­all un­em­ploy­ment num­ber is 8.1 per­cent in the fourth quarter of this year, Obama is very likely to get reelec­ted. Al­though not at the 7.2 per­cent level that Pres­id­ent Re­agan had in Novem­ber 1984, down from 10.8 per­cent two years earli­er, it would likely be enough to win — al­beit, not in the 49-state land­slide fash­ion Re­agan en­joyed.

One of the use­ful as­pects of the Blue Chip study is that it av­er­ages the 10 most op­tim­ist­ic pro­jec­tions as well as the 10 most pess­im­ist­ic ones. The op­tim­ists pro­ject un­em­ploy­ment in the first quarter of this year to stand at 8.2 per­cent, then to fall suc­cess­ively to 8.1 per­cent, 7.9 per­cent, and 7.7 per­cent in the oth­er three quar­ters — get­ting closer to Re­agan-land un­em­ploy­ment num­bers.

However, the pess­im­ists fore­see un­em­ploy­ment rising to and hold­ing at 8.6 per­cent in the first and second quar­ters, and stand­ing at 8.5 per­cent in the third and fourth — much more in jump-ball ter­rit­ory than “ad­vant­age Obama.” The dif­fer­ence is that the pess­im­ists are pro­ject­ing GDP growth to be un­der 2 per­cent for the en­tire year, while the op­tim­ists are fore­cast­ing growth of 3 per­cent or high­er for the second, third, and fourth quar­ters. The dif­fer­ence in the eco­nom­ic and the polit­ic­al tra­ject­or­ies would be huge.

We don’t know where the eco­nomy is go­ing or what cam­paign de­vel­op­ments will oc­cur. All we know is that things are dif­fer­ent than they were four months ago. Obama’s job-ap­prov­al rat­ing of 47 per­cent last week is high­er than he has had since last sum­mer, but there is no guar­an­tee it will hold for the next month, let alone the next eight. People jump­ing to con­clu­sions about this race do so at their per­il.

What We're Following See More »
Pruitt Confirmed As EPA Head
2 days ago
Harward Turns Down NSC Job
3 days ago

"Ret. Vice Adm. Bob Harward turned down President Donald Trump's offer to be national security adviser Thursday, depriving the administration of a top candidate for a critical foreign policy post days after Trump fired Michael Flynn." Among the potential reasons: his family, his lack of assurances that he could build his own team, and that "the White House seems so chaotic."

House Votes to Let States Block Planned Parenthood Funds
3 days ago

"The House passed a resolution Thursday re-opening the door for states to block Planned Parenthood from receiving some federal funds. The measure, which passed 230-188, would reverse a last-minute rule from the Obama administration that said conservative states can't block the women's health and abortion provider from receiving family planning dollars under the Title X program."

Alexander Acosta to Get Nod for Labor
3 days ago
New Labor Secretary Announcement Coming
3 days ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.