Ex-Gov. Terry Branstad (R) says he believes using telemedicine to prescribe and dispense abortion-inducing pills is inappropriate and the practice should be discontinued in IA. Branstad, in an interview on 10/7: “I think it’s a violation of the law. I think it’s wrong and I think a lot of Iowans feel it’s wrong and I don’t think it should continue.”
At issue is a practice by Planned Parenthood of the Heartland whereby licensed physicians use a remote-controlled system to conduct medical assessments with patients in rural IA clinics via a two-way, closed circuit audio-video hookup in real time and dispense Mifepristone, also known as RU-486, in the early stages of a pregnancy.
Want More On This Race? Check out the Hotline Dashboard for a comprehensive rundown of this race, including stories, polls, ads, FEC numbers, and more!
Gov. Chet Culver (D) said such a move would “pull the plug on progress” by curtailing all telemedicine activities that pose great potential for reducing costs and delivering services to rural IA (Boshart, Mason City Globe Gazette, 10/8).
Wearing Something Revealing
Culver said 10/8 IA voters should demand that Branstad reveal before Nov. 2 how he would cut 15% from the state budget, as he has pledged to do if he is elected gov. Culver: “It’s likely to cost him the election if he articulates clearly what he wants to do, and we’re going to force him to do that.”
In a written statement, Branstad mgr. Jeff Boeyink said, “Terry Branstad will again balance the state’s budget, offer pay-as-you-go budgeting, and take a thoughtful approach with his plan to reduce the cost of government 15 percent over the next five years” (Jacobs, Des Moines Register, 10/9).
There’s no question that Sen. Olympia Snowe‘s unexpected retirement gives Democrats improved prospects at holding onto the Senate, but the decision doesn’t change the underlying reality for both parties’ paths to a majority. The main takeaway from Snowe’s departure is that Republicans can’t simply rely on winning seats on the most conservative turf.
But Republicans are still on the offense in many more states. The biggest question is whether Republicans will pick up any seats in the traditional battleground states — Ohio, Florida, Virginia, New Mexico, Wisconsin, Michigan, even Pennsylvania — and hang onto Sen. Dean Heller’s seat in Nevada.
Here are four important questions surrounding key races:
1. Is Maine the Democratic slam dunk that conventional wisdom suggests?
Anyone expecting one party to have a clear advantage is mistaken. Democrats cheered at the news of Snowe’s decision — for good reason — but it’s far from a sure thing that the party will be favored to pick up her seat. Maine has a long tradition of quirky, independent-minded politics, and its elections rarely go the way of the national environment. The state’s Democratic nominee for governor only won 19 percent of the vote in the 2010 gubernatorial race, despite being a respected leader in the state Legislature. Go back to 1994, a wave year for Republicans, and now-Sen. Susan Collins only won 23 percent of the vote in a failed bid for governor, losing to Independent Angus King.
King has now reemerged as a candidate for Snowe’s seat, and all indications are he could start the race as a front-runner. King, who governed as a fiscal conservative, won reelection with a whopping 59 percent of the vote in 1998, and he retains cross-party popularity. Some Democrats are holding out hope that King could caucus with their party, but a more likely scenario is that he’d stay independent if he won.
With less than two weeks until the filing deadline, the major-party fields are still unclear. Democrats are looking at Rep. Chellie Pingree, a progressive favorite. But with King in the race, Pingree could get pushed to the left and lose voters to the independent candidate. She may not even run. Four Republicans with statewide profiles — Secretary of State Charlie Summers, state Treasurer Bruce Poliquin, Attorney General William Schneider, and former state Senate President Richard Bennett — are all looking at the race and would have a shot at holding the seat.
2. Does Scott Brown have momentum?
Don’t buy into the recent hype that Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass., has suddenly reemerged as the clear favorite to win reelection, fueled by several polls showing him in the lead. His race against Democrat Elizabeth Warren will likely go down to the wire, and his success will be dependent on whether he’s able to disqualify Warren as out of the mainstream in the eyes of Massachusetts voters.
Brown’s biggest challenge is the composition of the electorate, which will be significantly more Democratic this year than in his 2010 special-election upset. But his victory provided clues to a winning coalition — peeling off enough blue-collar Democrats and middle-class moderates.
As her impressive fundraising has shown, Warren is a formidable candidate who has sparked a connection with the party’s activists. The big question is whether she can win over working-class voters and not get caricatured as an ivory-tower elitist.
3. Which Republican recruit has the most on the line?
Few Republican challengers have generated as much hype as Ohio Treasurer Josh Mandel, but he hasn’t yet displayed the promise that has gotten certain Republican strategists excited about his campaign against Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio. Mandel, a 34-year-old former Marine who won election to the state Legislature in a solidly Democratic Cleveland-area district, has a ways to go to prove he can be a viable challenger. He’s received bad press back home for announcing a Senate campaign just after becoming state treasurer. In an interview this week with The Atlantic‘s Molly Ball, he stuck nervously to his talking points. It’s not for lack of knowledge; it’s that he’s desperately trying to avoid making any gaffes as he works overtime to ramp up on all the issues.
Mandel’s the type of candidate who will either become an instant star or prove the maxim that the first time isn’t always the charm.
4. Why is Virginia the most unpredictable Senate race in the country?
Senate races traditionally have been as much about the quality of candidates as the underlying national environment, but rarely have two candidates been as dependent on the top of the ticket as Democrat Tim Kaine and Republican George Allen. This race will be determined on whether President Obama can turn out as many college-aged and nonwhite voters as he did in 2008, or at least come close.
When Obama carried the state in 2008, 30 percent of those who voted were minorities and 22 percent were under 30. When Gov. Bob McDonnell swept into office a year later, only 22 percent of those who went to the polls were minorities and just 11 percent were under 30 — a huge drop-off. Kaine needs the Obama turnout machine to succeed in order to win.
What We're Following See More »
Retired Russian diplomats and members of Vladimir Putin's staff are compiling a dossier "on Donald Trump's psychological makeup" for the Russian leader. "Among its preliminary conclusions is that the new American leader is a risk-taker who can be naïve, according to a senior Kremlin adviser."
"Ret. Vice Adm. Bob Harward turned down President Donald Trump's offer to be national security adviser Thursday, depriving the administration of a top candidate for a critical foreign policy post days after Trump fired Michael Flynn." Among the potential reasons: his family, his lack of assurances that he could build his own team, and that "the White House seems so chaotic."
"The House passed a resolution Thursday re-opening the door for states to block Planned Parenthood from receiving some federal funds. The measure, which passed 230-188, would reverse a last-minute rule from the Obama administration that said conservative states can't block the women's health and abortion provider from receiving family planning dollars under the Title X program."