Politics: Need-to-Know Video

Four Keys to Immigration Reform: Captialize on Public Opinion

Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
May 18, 2011, 3:23 p.m.

At the “Eggs & Is­sues for­um” in Port­land, all 5 GOV can­did­ates were “peppered” with “with quite a vari­ety of” ques­tions.

On wheth­er “med­ic­al marijuana” will “hurt” ME, “all five said no.”

Want More On This Race? Check out the Hot­line Dash­board for a com­pre­hens­ive run­down of this race, in­clud­ing stor­ies, polls, ads, FEC num­bers, and more!

On “Should the gov­ernor have line-item veto power?” Atty/ex-OMB As­soc. Dir. for Nat­ur­al Re­sources, En­ergy and Sci­ence/Jimmy Carter ex-aide Eli­ot Cut­ler (I): “Ab­so­lutely yes.”

Wa­terville May­or Paul LePage (R): “A good gov­ernor doesn’t need it, but a weak gov­ernor may have to have it.”

‘84 SEN nom­in­ee/‘90 ME-01 can­did­ate/state Sen­ate Pres./ex-state House Speak­er Libby Mitchell (D): “No. I don’t need it.”

On the ques­tion “Would you raise the sales tax to bal­ance the budget?”

Cut­ler: “The first thing we have to do is get the spend­ing un­der con­trol. We have to squeeze the liv­ing beje­sus out of (the budget).”

LePage: “Pri­or­it­ize, then look at it.”

Mitchell: “No for now, and I want to know what beje­sus means” (Cov­ers, Cent­ral Maine Morn­ing Sen­tinel, 10/11).

Tun­nel Vis­ion

LePage “out­lined his vis­ion for the state” in a 10/8 “speech be­fore about 60 people at an event hos­ted by the Brun­swick Rotary Club, Coastal Rotary Club of Brun­swick and the Top­sham Es­presso Rotary.”

LePage: “This cam­paign is really go­ing to be about people ahead of polit­ics. And my whole ca­reer in Wa­terville and throughout my work­ing life had been pretty much about people.”

More LePage: “The next gov­ernor is fa­cing a bad eco­nomy in Maine, not only brought on by the re­ces­sion, but by 35 years of one-party con­trol. We need to un­leash the job cre­at­ors” (Met­z­ler, Port­land Press Her­ald, 10/9).

All Grown Up

Bangor Daily News pro­files each of the can­did­ates job growth plans.

For Cut­ler “the first steps to­ward true, long-term eco­nom­ic growth be­gin by lower­ing the costs of health care, en­ergy and gov­ern­ment com­bined with chan­ging the reg­u­lat­ory en­vir­on­ment in state gov­ern­ment.” Cut­ler “wants to cre­ate an En­ergy Fin­ance Au­thor­ity that will take ad­vant­age of its status as a pub­lic en­tity to se­cure low-in­terest, tax-ex­empt fin­an­cing for en­ergy in­fra­struc­ture pro­jects or to help private busi­nesses re­duce their en­ergy costs.”

“At the heart of” LePage’s “reg­u­lat­ory re­form pro­gram is a pro­pos­al to re­quire that every state agency re­view rules ‘to prove their reg­u­lat­ory policies im­prove Maine and are not just a road­b­lock to new job op­por­tun­it­ies.’” LePage “would also in­sti­tute a policy in which state agen­cies have 90 days to re­spond to new busi­ness per­mits.”

Mitchell “has ar­gued that” ME “can cre­ate new, sus­tain­able jobs by in­vest­ing in Maine’s “green eco­nomy” through a dual fo­cus on con­ser­va­tion meas­ures and de­vel­op­ment of re­new­able en­ergy sources as well as by strength­en­ing pro­grams aimed at en­cour­aging busi­ness in­vest­ment. She would ex­pand the cur­rent fo­cus on home and busi­ness weather­iz­a­tion by con­tinu­ing to seek fed­er­al fund­ing and ded­ic­at­ing rev­en­ues from the cap-and-trade pro­gram known as the Re­gion­al Green­house Gas Ini­ti­at­ive to­ward con­ser­va­tion” (10/8).

It’s Already Sno­we­ing In Maine

Sen. Olympia Snowe (R) and Sen. Susan Collins (R) “are not on the bal­lot next month, but they are on the cam­paign trail for oth­er GOP can­did­ates across the state, and in oth­er states.”

Snowe “has ap­peared at events with the GOP top of the tick­et can­did­ates” in­clud­ing LePage and “so has Collins.” And “Collins said she has ap­peared with dozens of loc­al can­did­ates throughout the state and has cam­paigned in Phil­adelphia for” PA SEN nom­in­ee Pat Toomey (R) and says “she may cam­paign for oth­er” SEN “can­did­ates if she is asked and sched­ules per­mit.”

Collins: “This is a very im­port­ant elec­tion here in Maine and across the coun­try. These elec­tions are go­ing to be so crit­ic­al in de­term­in­ing the fu­ture of our state that I have to be in­volved”

Snowe: “I am go­ing to be cam­paign­ing very hard for Re­pub­lic­an can­did­ates in Maine, which is my first pri­or­ity, but also across the coun­try. I will be at­tend­ing events and help­ing to raise money and do­ing as much as I can to help can­did­ates” (Leary, Bangor Daily News, 10/10).

No In­die Cred

“Des­pite spend­ing more money than any oth­er can­did­ate and im­press­ing people with his com­mand of the is­sues, Cut­ler has been un­able to build any mo­mentum, polls show. Bar­ring a surge in the last weeks of the cam­paign, Cut­ler’s pop­ular­ity may have peaked this sum­mer.”

“Cut­ler said he has no­ticed a surge of sup­port at cam­paign events in the past week, due to his per­form­ance at re­cent for­ums and de­bates. He said the polls in Septem­ber wor­ried him, but he now be­lieves he can win.”

Cul­ter: “The only ques­tion is wheth­er I have enough time, and I think I do” (Bell, Cent­ral Maine Morn­ing Sen­tinel, 10/8).

The Tip­ping Point

Cent­ral Maine Morn­ing Sen­tinel’s Tip­ping of­fers can­did cri­ti­cism for the GOV can­did­ates, writ­ing “Mitchell cam­paign’s first two TV com­mer­cials of the gen­er­al elec­tion show stark con­trasts between her” LePage “on the en­vir­on­ment and edu­ca­tion.” But “polit­ic­al sci­ent­ists tell us that these kinds of con­trast ads do the most to in­form the elect­or­ate, and they’re prob­ably the best move to make for a can­did­ate who is down in the polls, but they also, ob­vi­ously, con­tain a neg­at­ive mes­sage. At­tack­ing one’s op­pon­ent, even on le­git­im­ate dif­fer­ences of policy, has in­her­ent risks, es­pe­cially in Maine’s easy-go­ing polit­ic­al cul­ture.”

For LePage “the mis­takes have been nu­mer­ous” and “most have been per­son­al gaffes rather than stra­tegic blun­ders, but the fact he keeps mak­ing them points to­ward lar­ger prob­lems with­in his cam­paign.”

LePage “should have taken a per­son­al crash course in both pub­lic policy and pub­lic re­la­tions. It will take a lot to re­pair the dam­age LePage has done to his cam­paign and change his pub­lic im­age as a reck­less and dis­hon­est right-wing can­did­ate. The best thing he can do now is to hire some good com­mu­nic­a­tions staff and ac­tu­ally do what they tell him to. He should pay spe­cial at­ten­tion to ad­vice about mes­sage con­sist­ency. The best way to avoid mak­ing that kind of pub­lic mis­take is to be pre­pared with a simple, clear and rel­ev­ant mes­sage and to stick to it and not get side­tracked. LePage may have already be­gun to make the ne­ces­sary changes. The cam­paign re­cently hired a new press sec­ret­ary, Dan De­meritt, who has pre­vi­ously done com­mu­nic­a­tions for the” ME GOP­ers (10/10).

The Re­pub­lic­an Party is in the midst of a self-im­mol­at­ing primary that pits its elect­able, if un­pop­u­lar, mod­er­ate wing against its un­elect­able, pas­sion­ate flank. Pres­id­ent Obama has more than 10 times the cash on hand as his nearest rival, and his team is rap­idly build­ing a ground or­gan­iz­a­tion un­like any seen in mod­ern polit­ics. And, slowly, the eco­nomy is boun­cing back.

Those should be sure signs of a pres­id­ent cruis­ing to­ward reelec­tion. But Obama’s team doesn’t sleep easy at night, and it shouldn’t: The eight-month path between now and Elec­tion Day con­tains a series of obstacles, all of which pose threats of vari­ous de­grees to the pres­id­ent’s cam­paign. They are the three G’s — gas, Greece, and the Gulf.

To­geth­er, those three factors rep­res­ent what former De­fense Sec­ret­ary Don­ald Rums­feld might call the “known un­knowns” of the cam­paign. They con­spire to throw the best-laid plans of even the smartest cam­paigns off-track and off-mes­sage, and they demon­strate the lim­ited power of the pres­id­ency in an age of glob­al eco­nom­ic con­nectiv­ity and tur­moil.

Already, rising gas­ol­ine prices have dam­aged Obama’s stand­ing and sapped some of the con­sumer con­fid­ence that was build­ing around a re­viv­ing eco­nomy. A CBS/New York Times poll re­leased on Tues­day showed Obama’s ap­prov­al rat­ing fall­ing to 41 per­cent, its low­est point ever in that sur­vey and a 9-point drop since the second week of Feb­ru­ary. Just 39 per­cent said they ap­prove of Obama’s hand­ling of the eco­nomy, down 5 points since last month. That pre­cip­it­ous drop has come as gas prices skyrock­eted from an av­er­age of $3.47 a gal­lon when Obama re­gistered a 50 per­cent ap­prov­al rat­ing in the last New York Times sur­vey on Feb. 13, to $3.81 a gal­lon on Wed­nes­day.

Re­pub­lic­ans, wisely, began ham­mer­ing Obama over gas prices weeks ago, be­fore most Amer­ic­ans began feel­ing the most acute pain at the pump. The cost of gas rises pre­dict­ably dur­ing each spring; a seni­or Re­pub­lic­an strategist in­volved in de­vel­op­ing the gas-price line of at­tack con­fided that the party was get­ting a head start, to put it­self in a po­s­i­tion to cap­it­al­ize when Amer­ic­ans tuned in. The dif­fer­ence between this year and oth­er years, however, is that prices have be­gun to spike earli­er in the year than in the past; over the past six years, gas prices have tra­di­tion­ally spiked around May and June, rather than in Feb­ru­ary and March, ac­cord­ing to data from the En­ergy In­form­a­tion Ad­min­is­tra­tion.

Mean­while, the threat of a pos­sible shoot­ing war in the Middle East looms lar­ger than ever. Is­raeli of­fi­cials are talk­ing openly of at­tack­ing nuc­le­ar fa­cil­it­ies in Ir­an, and De­fense Sec­ret­ary Le­on Pan­etta told Na­tion­al Journ­al that the United States has be­gun pre­par­ing mil­it­ary op­tions if eco­nom­ic and dip­lo­mat­ic sanc­tions fail. If Is­rael at­tacks, they will likely do so with Amer­ic­an sup­port — not only polit­ic­al, but also mil­it­ary. Though polit­ics used to stop at the wa­ter’s edge, any open con­flict would have ripple ef­fects in the pres­id­en­tial con­test.

The prob­lem is neither side is con­fid­ent in its ana­lys­is of how those ripple ef­fects would play out.

But the biggest threat to Obama’s reelec­tion chances comes not from the Middle East; it comes from Europe, where fin­an­cial in­stabil­ity could lead to an­oth­er re­ces­sion. Greece’s tee­ter­ing eco­nomy is be­ing bailed out in small in­cre­ments, in ex­change for ma­jor aus­ter­ity meas­ures ne­go­ti­ated by the European Cent­ral Bank, Ger­many, and France. But elec­tion years in the United States can bring gov­ern­ing to a grind­ing halt, and Greece is no dif­fer­ent. Le­gis­lat­ive elec­tions set for April or May could put aus­ter­ity ne­go­ti­ations on hold, jeop­ard­iz­ing the del­ic­ate task of re­struc­tur­ing the Greek eco­nomy.

And though they have moved off the front pages, the fin­an­cial situ­ations in Italy, Spain, and Por­tugal re­main pre­cari­ous. The in­ter­con­nec­ted glob­al eco­nomy means any dis­aster in Europe, no mat­ter how con­tained, would re­ver­ber­ate here. Every bit of bad news in Athens leads to a bad day on Wall Street.

In all three cases, there is little an in­cum­bent pres­id­ent can do to al­le­vi­ate these loom­ing threats in the short run. Even if the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment were to al­low off­shore oil drilling and the Key­stone XL pipeline, it would be years un­til the ad­di­tion­al ca­pa­city reached U.S. mar­kets; short of open­ing the Stra­tegic Pet­ro­leum Re­serve, Obama has few op­tions that would lead dir­ectly to lower gas prices. If Is­rael de­cides its win­dow of op­por­tun­ity to delay Ir­an’s nuc­le­ar am­bi­tions is clos­ing, there is little Obama can do to con­vince Prime Min­is­ter Ben­jamin Net­an­yahu to hold off, while polit­ic­al pres­sure back home could force the United States to back its spe­cial ally. And the suc­cess — or fail­ure — of the Greek re­cov­ery lies more in An­gela Merkel’s hands than in Obama’s, put­ting a ma­jor factor in the fu­ture of the U.S. eco­nomy’s re­bound out of White House con­trol.

Demo­crats felt good about Obama’s pro­spects in Feb­ru­ary. But polit­ic­al real­ity — and the real­it­ies of the lim­its of the pres­id­ency — tem­per their moods. The known un­knowns that will cloud the next eight months mean neither side can be as­sured of vic­tory, no mat­ter how bright the latest poll seems.

What We're Following See More »
Gen. Kelly Rips Rep. Wilson for Criticism
2 hours ago
Bush Slams Trump, Implicitly
2 hours ago
Senate Rejects Effort to Nix SALT Tax Changes
3 hours ago

"Senate Democrats on Thursday failed in their first attempt to save the state and local tax deduction, which helps many residents of California and other high-cost states reduce their federal income tax bills. The Republican-controlled Senate voted 52-47 to reject an amendment that would have prevented the Senate from considering any bill that repeals or limits the deduction as part of a planned tax overhaul."

Trump to Hill Next Tuesday
4 hours ago
Longtime Progressive Members Pushed Out at DNC
5 hours ago

"A shake-up is underway at the Democratic National Committee as several key longtime officials have lost their posts, exposing a still-raw rift in the party and igniting anger among those in its progressive wing who see retaliation for their opposition to DNC Chairman Tom Perez. The ousters come ahead of the DNC's first meeting, in Las Vegas, Nevada, since Perez took over as chairman with a pledge this year to unite a party that had become badly divided during the brutal Bernie Sanders-Hillary Clinton 2016 primary race."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.