Politics: White House

In Ohio, Obama’s Jeep Wrangler Joke Gets Mixed Response at Chrysler Plant

Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
June 3, 2011, 10:14 a.m.

An EPIC-MRA poll; con­duc­ted 10/3-7 for the De­troit Free Press/WXYZ-TV; sur­veyed 600 LVs; mar­gin of er­ror +/- 4.0% (re­lease, 10/10).

Obama As POTUS

- Now 6/15 5/26 3/31 2/25 1/26 12/9 10/09 6/09 Ex­cel­lent/good 43% 47% 44% 44% 45% 41% 44% 48% 57% Just fair/poor 57 52 55 55 54 58 55 51 42


- Now 9/12 8/23 6/15 5/26 3/31 B. Obama 47%/47% n/a 44%/49% 51%/42% 49%/42% 50%/44% J. Gran­holm 35 /58 38%/58% 32 /63 39 /55 36 /59 38 /56

(For more from this poll, please see today’s MI GOV story.)

Nearly every morn­ing I try to wake up, be grate­ful for a new day, put my feet on the floor slowly, have a cup of tea, be as Zen as pos­sible, and ease in­to the day as best as I can. As I say, “feet floor, tea, door!” Today in New York City, that pro­cess got dis­rup­ted in the res­taur­ant of the hotel where I am stay­ing. Big time. And it was all over the defin­i­tion of sex­ism — a top­ic that has been in the news and will un­fold a good bit more in polit­ics over the com­ing months.

First, a little back­ground on my up­bring­ing. I was raised by a very strong and in­de­pend­ent mom. She was top of her class in high school in De­troit and at the Je­suit Uni­versity of De­troit. She read vo­ra­ciously, loved de­bate, and was smart as a whip. She began her ca­reer as a pub­lic school teach­er in the Mo­tor City, then had her first of 11 chil­dren. After that, the tra­ject­ory of her life changed dra­mat­ic­ally, as well as the per­cep­tion of her by many people she en­countered.

She would go to the gro­cery store with many of us, we would haul around two huge, fully-loaded carts, and you could see the dirty looks she was giv­en for hav­ing so many chil­dren. You would hear the not-so-subtle re­marks about her be­ing ig­nor­ant or un­educated or even dumb be­cause of all the kids, and of course be­cause she wasn’t dressed to the nines. It taught me a lot about not as­sum­ing you know someone’s story by what you see or by your own pre­ju­dices.

I think wo­men should be treated com­pletely as equals, that they can do most everything as well as a man, and that this coun­try would prob­ably be a lot bet­ter off if a wo­man was pres­id­ent, or run­ning most of the cor­por­a­tions in Amer­ica. But I also be­lieve in open­ing a door for a wo­man, help­ing a wo­man with her bag on the plane, stand­ing up when she comes to the table, and if she is be­ing ac­cos­ted on the street, step­ping in to help.

So as I walked in­to the café with a base­ball cap on (I am fol­lically chal­lenged) to grab a piece of toast and tea, I over­heard an older man in a golf shirt talk­ing about the Mas­ters con­tro­versy. This is the ri­dicu­lous situ­ation in which the golf club re­fuses to ad­mit any wo­man as a mem­ber — in­clud­ing the cur­rent head of IBM (Ginni Ro­metty), whose com­pany is spon­sor­ing the tour­na­ment. Every oth­er head of IBM has got­ten a green jack­et when it has sponsored, but not Ro­metty.

So this blow­hard in the res­taur­ant was spout­ing off to a buddy about how ri­dicu­lous it was for “wo­men” (he was us­ing this in a pe­jor­at­ive way) to force the Mas­ters to do this. And then he said there was a con­tro­versy at his golf club be­cause wo­men wanted equal tee times to men on Sat­urday morn­ings, and his club “un­for­tu­nately” fi­nally re­len­ted and let wo­men get tee times even though “wo­men” didn’t work like men. I was just pass­ively listen­ing to this and try­ing to ig­nore it.

Then, as he was leav­ing, he walked up to me at my table and said, “You should take off your base­ball cap be­cause there was a wo­man in the res­taur­ant.” I answered, “Really?” And he said, “Really.” I was blown away by the in­cred­ible irony and hy­po­crisy, and said, “Are those your rules?” He mumbled something, I called him a bore, and as I walked out in­to the hustle and bustle I was shak­ing my head.

I am quite sure wo­men are faced with worse every day of their lives just as my Mom was — wheth­er they are full-time moth­ers, full-time work­ers, or a mix of both, as most are. It does raise a fun­da­ment­al ques­tion about what it means to be a gen­tle­man and which is more im­port­ant — the sur­face or ap­pear­ances, or something deep­er and more fun­da­ment­al.

Yes, I think Ann Rom­ney is a great sur­rog­ate for her hus­band on is­sues re­lated to wo­men, but don’t we really want to know Mitt Rom­ney’s val­ues re­lated to wo­men not only at home, but in the work­place?

Pres­id­ent Obama’s spokes­man, Jay Car­ney, said on Thursday that the pres­id­ent be­lieves wo­men should be per­mit­ted at the club — a sen­ti­ment that Rom­ney later echoed. But don’t we want to know how Rom­ney or Obama is go­ing to cre­ate a bet­ter en­vir­on­ment where wo­men can have the choice — to stay at home and raise a fam­ily and not worry about health in­sur­ance, or go to work full-time and not be judged on wheth­er they are a good mom, or be giv­en more flex time to do both?

I hope we can have this dis­cus­sion without both sides in the de­bate de­volving in­to slo­gans and talk­ing points, with the Left ac­cus­ing the Right of wa­ging a war on wo­men or the Right say­ing the Left is wa­ging a war on fam­ily val­ues. And maybe we can learn to treat each oth­er as ladies and gen­tle­men — but I still will prob­ably wear my cap over my bald head at break­fast.

What We're Following See More »
Byrd Rule Could Trip Up Health Legislation
16 hours ago

"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”

Senate Votes To Fund Government
19 hours ago
House Passes Spending Bill
20 hours ago

The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.

Puerto Rico Another Sticking Point in Budget Talks
1 days ago

President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."

Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
1 days ago

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.