Politics: Congress

Weiner: ‘I Lied’ About Lewd Photo

Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
June 6, 2011, 1:46 p.m.

Ex-NY Comp. Alan Hevesi (D) told a judge 10/7 “how he took part in a sprawl­ing cor­rup­tion scheme” in­volving NY’s $125B pen­sion fund “while serving as its sole trust­ee.” Hevesi: “I deeply re­gret my con­duct and I sin­cerely and deeply apo­lo­gize to the people of the state of New York, to the court, to my fam­ily.” He pleaded guilty “to a single felony count.”

“Still, it was un­clear wheth­er Mr. Hevesi will face any jail time.” Hevesi also ad­mit­ted “for the first time” 10/7 “he had known that his long­time polit­ic­al con­sult­ant, Hank Mor­ris, set him­self up as a middle­man between in­vest­ment firms and the pen­sion fund.” State of­fi­cials al­leged the ar­range­ment “net­ted” Mor­ris “mil­lions of dol­lars and al­lowed him to grant a vari­ety of fa­vors” to Hevesi’s al­lies (Hakim/Rash­baum, New York Times, 10/7).

A Moot Point

Two-time-AK Gov./ex-In­teri­or Sec. Wal­ter Hick­el (R) “was in­vest­ig­ated by fed­er­al au­thor­it­ies for fraud” for hav­ing a Nat’l Guard “plane ferry per­son­al be­long­ings” to AK from DC, after Richard Nix­on fired him as In­teri­or Sec. in ‘70. “Noth­ing came of the in­vest­ig­a­tion, which was dis­closed with­in 362 pages of doc­u­ments re­leased this week” by the FBI un­der a Free­dom of In­form­a­tion re­quest (Bo­hr­er, AP, 10/7).

The pace of the ex­ceed­ingly fra­gile eco­nom­ic re­cov­ery over the 204 days between now and the Nov. 6 elec­tion is a lot more im­port­ant than any­thing that either Pres­id­ent Obama or Mitt Rom­ney says over the course of the cam­paign. How fast the eco­nomy grows — meas­ured by change in gross do­mest­ic product, in the un­em­ploy­ment rate, and in real per­son­al dis­pos­able in­come, as well as in oil and gas­ol­ine prices — will be far more in­flu­en­tial than rhet­or­ic in de­term­in­ing wheth­er voters re­new Obama’s con­tract for an­oth­er four years.  

If the eco­nomy grows, the job­less rate de­clines, real in­comes in­crease, and gas­ol­ine prices drop, Obama’s eco­nom­ic policy would be val­id­ated. It would also heal some of the scar tis­sue of his first two years, when his ap­prov­al num­bers plummeted among in­de­pend­ent voters and Demo­crats were ejec­ted from their House ma­jor­ity. Con­versely, if eco­nom­ic growth re­mains slug­gish, the job­less rate stays about the same, voters’ per­son­al fin­ances don’t im­prove, and gas prices stay high, Obama’s situ­ation would look con­sid­er­ably dim­mer.

The struggles would re­in­force linger­ing doubts from 2009 and 2010, when voters saw the pres­id­ent and the Demo­crat­ic Con­gress as be­ing more fo­cused on health care re­form than on a dra­mat­ic­ally worsen­ing eco­nomy. His reelec­tion hopes would di­min­ish.

To a cer­tain ex­tent, the level of the down­ward drag on the eco­nomy for the next six-plus months is bey­ond the con­trol of mere mor­tals. Europe, which con­trib­utes 21 per­cent of glob­al eco­nom­ic growth, is in a re­ces­sion; the sov­er­eign debt crisis in South­ern Europe — with Spain and Por­tugal in­creas­ingly re­pla­cing Greece in the head­lines — is a threat to world fin­an­cial mar­kets. China’s eco­nomy also has in­creas­ing dif­fi­culties, and eco­nom­ists de­bate over wheth­er it is headed for a soft land­ing (slow­ing down, flat­ten­ing, but avoid­ing a re­ces­sion) or a hard land­ing (more vi­ol­ent, rough­er, and pos­sibly head­ing in­to a re­ces­sion). Why do these events from around the world mat­ter to us, bey­ond the spillover ef­fect? If world­wide fin­an­cial in­sti­tu­tions be­come weakened, U.S. ex­ports drop. This de­cline then hurts our do­mest­ic eco­nomy. In­cred­ibly low nat­ur­al-gas prices in the United States give many sec­tors of the na­tion’s man­u­fac­tur­ing eco­nomy a boost. But if fer­til­izer, chem­ic­als, and oth­er goods can’t be sold abroad, that ad­vant­age evap­or­ates.

An­oth­er ele­ment may fur­ther dam­age the eco­nomy as well: We are already start­ing to hear the drum­beat of con­cern among busi­ness lead­ers and the fin­an­cial mar­kets over the com­ing fisc­al cliff. The con­cern is that Con­gress and Obama will not re­solve the is­sue of the ex­pir­a­tion of the Bush tax cuts (which ex­pire on Dec. 31) and that they will not be able to re­duce the size of the de­fi­cit by Jan. 2, for­cing the budget se­quest­ra­tion pro­cess to kick in. Se­quest­ra­tion ba­sic­ally would make dra­mat­ic across-the-board spend­ing cuts to the fed­er­al budget, ex­empt­ing only So­cial Se­cur­ity and Medi­care.

I heard one of the smartest guys on Wall Street this week say that the pres­id­ent and Con­gress will have about 29 work­ing days for Con­gress to deal with the ex­pir­a­tion of the Bush tax cuts and budget se­quest­ra­tion, which if al­lowed to run their courses, would equate to a 3.5 per­cent drop in GDP.

Some budget hawks might say that the end of the Bush tax cuts and the start of se­quest­ra­tion would be good de­vel­op­ments. Elim­in­at­ing the tax cuts would pull in an enorm­ous amount of new rev­en­ue, and forced spend­ing cuts would dra­mat­ic­ally de­crease fed­er­al spend­ing. But eco­nom­ists warn that these two sim­ul­tan­eous hits on a very fra­gile eco­nomy could well trig­ger a double-dip re­ces­sion. Add in­to that equa­tion that the fed­er­al debt lim­it will likely be reached late this year or early next year, and you have the fisc­al cliff that we are headed to­ward, if Obama and Con­gress don’t act to avoid it.

Cor­por­ate ex­ec­ut­ives and the fin­an­cial mar­kets might be­gin to get spooked by the pos­sib­il­ity of the U.S. eco­nomy go­ing off a cliff for a second time in five years. They might be­gin scal­ing back spend­ing plans, slow­ing down re­hir­ing, selling stocks and bonds, and tak­ing oth­er de­fens­ive meas­ures to pro­tect their com­pan­ies, in­sti­tu­tions, and port­fo­li­os in case of a fisc­al dis­aster. Those ac­tions them­selves would slow down eco­nom­ic growth.  

Eco­nom­ic de­cision-makers will be watch­ing Wash­ing­ton in­creas­ingly closely over the next six months. They will look for signs as to wheth­er poli­cy­makers can deal with the is­sues of rais­ing the debt lim­it, ex­tend­ing some or all of the tax cuts, and achiev­ing suf­fi­cient de­fi­cit re­duc­tion to avoid se­quest­ra­tion.

Evid­ence of con­tin­ued hy­per-par­tis­an­ship will res­ult in anxious busi­ness lead­ers tak­ing pro­phy­lact­ic meas­ures to pro­tect against a sharp down­turn. Evid­ence of co­oper­a­tion and com­prom­ise will make them more likely to hire, in­vest, and ex­pand.  

Words and ac­tions in Wash­ing­ton al­ways mat­ter. But in an eco­nomy this fra­gile, they mat­ter even more than usu­al.

What We're Following See More »
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
4 days ago
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
4 days ago
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
4 days ago

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
5 days ago

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
5 days ago

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.