Politics: Campaign 2012

Voters Have Reason to Engage in 2012 Election

Add to Briefcase
June 6, 2011, 6:21 p.m.

Dur­ing a web­cast in­ter­view 10/7, teen mom/ab­stin­ence ad­voc­ate Bris­tol Pal­in “said she’d like to see” ex-AK Gov. Sarah Pal­in (R) run for the WH, say­ing her moth­er is “awe­some for this coun­try.” Bris­tol: “I know she’s qual­i­fied to do the job.”

More Bris­tol, on “im­plic­a­tions” Pal­in “might be dumb”: “She’s the smartest wo­man I know.”

Bris­tol also said her moth­er’s por­tray­al on “Sat­urday Night Live” had “bugged” her. Bris­tol: “But then again it was com­ing from Tina Fey, who’s im­per­son­a­tion of my mom was def­in­itely not dead-on. They look like each oth­er, but my mom doesn’t talk the way that Tina Fey talks.”

More Bris­tol, on son Tripp: “I want him to be happy and healthy and hope­fully he’ll play hockey” (Mer­cer, Fargo For­um, 10/7).

In the next month, we’re poised to see the latest death blow to cent­rism in both parties, with Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Richard Lugar of In­di­ana in the primary fight of his polit­ic­al life and a lead­ing Blue Dog Demo­crat, Rep. Tim Hold­en, fa­cing an un­her­al­ded but ser­i­ous and well-fun­ded chal­lenger in next week’s Pennsylvania primary.

The re­tire­ment of mod­er­ate Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, was only a blip on the radar screen mon­it­or­ing the shrink­ing of parties’ cent­rist fac­tions, which al­lowed com­prom­ise and deal-mak­ing to flour­ish in the past. The rise of the tea party move­ment may have spot­lighted the GOP’s drift right­ward, but the cent­rist de­cline is a bi­par­tis­an phe­nomen­on.

It’s plaus­ible that after the 2012 elec­tion, thanks to par­tis­an re­dis­trict­ing and the ideo­lo­gic­al re­ori­ent­ing of the parties, there will be only three white South­ern Demo­crats left in the House — Jim Cooper of Ten­ness­ee, Gene Green of Texas, and Dav­id Price of North Car­o­lina. Of the 34 Demo­crats who voted against Pres­id­ent Obama’s health care law, 24 either lost their seats in 2010 or plan to re­tire after this Con­gress, and an­oth­er six are fa­cing dif­fi­cult reelec­tion cam­paigns. There’s little chance the mod­er­ate Blue Dog Caucus can plaus­ibly sur­vive after the elec­tion giv­en that at­tri­tion. Mean­while, the base is thriv­ing: Three of the mar­quee Demo­crats run­ning for Sen­ate this year — Sen. Sher­rod Brown of Ohio, Rep. Tammy Bald­win of Wis­con­sin, and Eliza­beth War­ren in Mas­sachu­setts — are all run­ning to the pop­u­list left.

Mean­while, Re­pub­lic­ans ap­pear con­tent to al­low primary voters to render their ver­dicts on in­flu­en­tial vet­er­an mem­bers they view as in­suf­fi­ciently con­ser­vat­ive — Lugar; Sen. Or­rin Hatch, R-Utah; and House En­ergy and Com­merce Chair­man Fred Up­ton, R-Mich. — even though they’ve nev­er had trouble on their right flank in the past. But in the cur­rent cli­mate, nuc­le­ar dip­lomacy is out, mil­it­ary hawk­ish­ness is in; past sup­port of cap-and-trade is polit­ic­ally tox­ic; Solyn­dra is the buzzword of the mo­ment; and ever hav­ing teamed up with the late Sen. Ed­ward Kennedy, D-Mass., on le­gis­la­tion is an oc­cu­pa­tion­al haz­ard. The GOP battles are as much gen­er­a­tion­al as ideo­lo­gic­al: House Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor’s dar­ing en­dorse­ment and dona­tion to fresh­man Rep. Adam Kin­zinger over long­time con­ser­vat­ive Don Man­zullo last month, in a mem­ber-versus-mem­ber primary, is in­dic­at­ive of the GOP primary elect­or­ate’s think­ing.

The up­com­ing primar­ies in In­di­ana and Pennsylvania il­lus­trate how the changes in the coun­try’s elect­or­ate have put two re­spec­ted con­gres­sion­al mem­bers at ser­i­ous risk.

Lugar, whose vot­ing re­cord is tra­di­tion­ally con­ser­vat­ive, is from a by­gone era. His early praise of then-Sen. Barack Obama’s vot­ing re­cord on nuc­le­ar non­pro­lif­er­a­tion at the be­gin­ning of the 2008 pres­id­en­tial race fore­shad­owed his cur­rent polit­ic­al pre­dic­a­ment. His pet is­sue is viewed by many as a rel­ic of the Cold War, and any praise of Obama is tox­ic in a GOP primary. Mean­while, he’s been serving in Wash­ing­ton so long that he no longer has a per­man­ent ad­dress in his home state. These are glar­ing red flags that were be­ing waved long be­fore he moun­ted his reelec­tion cam­paign.

The one miss­ing in­gredi­ent was al­ways the pres­ence of a for­mid­able primary chal­lenger. In­di­ana Treas­urer Richard Mour­dock had a de­cent re­sume but a dry cam­paign style, and he ini­tially struggled to raise money and win en­dorse­ments. But as in  any race against a vul­ner­able in­cum­bent, voters will render their de­cision primar­ily on their sat­is­fac­tion with that in­cum­bent. In a sign of where this race is headed, con­ser­vat­ive groups have ral­lied be­hind Mour­dock, who out­raised the long­time sen­at­or last quarter and is in strik­ing dis­tance in the latest in­de­pend­ent poll.

Hold­en’s pre­dic­a­ment in Pennsylvania is a test­a­ment to the par­tis­an work­ings be­hind the ger­ry­man­der­ing pro­cess, which has re­duced the num­ber of com­pet­it­ive dis­tricts where cent­rism would be an as­set. The Blue Dog Demo­crat had reg­u­larly dis­patched Re­pub­lic­an op­pon­ents des­pite run­ning in a dis­trict that reg­u­larly backed GOP pres­id­en­tial can­did­ates. His op­pos­i­tion to abor­tion rights, gun con­trol, and his party’s green-en­ergy ini­ti­at­ives were polit­ic­al win­ners in his con­ser­vat­ive-minded former dis­trict. But re­drawn in­to a solidly Demo­crat­ic one, Hold­en is now fa­cing a ser­i­ous chal­lenge on his left from tri­al at­tor­ney Matt Cartwright — and find­ing that his old stances are now ma­jor vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies. The cam­paign has got­ten nasty: Cartwright sent out mail­ers ac­cus­ing Hold­en of be­ing an aco­lyte of former Vice Pres­id­ent Dick Cheney and a pawn of Big Oil.

Hold­en is the more-pol­ished can­did­ate. But his new dis­trict isn’t just dif­fer­ent ideo­lo­gic­ally; about 80 per­cent of his con­stitu­ents are brand new. So he doesn’t hold the in­cum­bency ad­vant­age that most mem­bers start out with. Both cam­paigns are claim­ing they have the edge, and it’s likely to go down to the wire.

As my col­league Ron Brown­stein wrote in last week’s Na­tion­al Journ­al cov­er story, con­gres­sion­al cam­paigns are be­com­ing akin to par­lia­ment­ary elec­tions, with few­er voters pick­ing pres­id­en­tial and Con­gres­sion­al can­did­ates from dif­fer­ent parties. In­deed, both parties have be­come ho­mo­gen­eous to the point where they’re al­most en­tirely sor­ted out along ideo­lo­gic­al lines.  The term “mod­er­ate” is an ana­chron­ism these days.

This trend has sig­ni­fic­ant im­plic­a­tions for the fu­ture tra­ject­ory of both parties. Demo­crats have more to lose polit­ic­ally if their party con­tin­ues its left­ward drift, be­cause con­ser­vat­ives out­num­ber lib­er­als by a 2-to-1 mar­gin, ac­cord­ing to sur­veys of the Amer­ic­an elect­or­ate, most re­cently a Gal­lup poll re­leased in Janu­ary. In the mod­ern era, Demo­crats have de­pended on a co­ali­tion of lib­er­als and mod­er­ates to win elec­tions, and the 2010 midterm losses nearly decim­ated the lat­ter fac­tion. But Re­pub­lic­ans have lately shown little tol­er­ance for ideo­lo­gic­al apostasy on is­sues like im­mig­ra­tion, which would al­low them to ex­pand their ap­peal bey­ond the con­ser­vat­ive base.

For all of the polit­ic­al changes over the past two dec­ades, the ideo­lo­gic­al com­pos­i­tion of the coun­try has re­mained re­mark­ably con­stant, even as the num­ber of mem­bers rep­res­ent­ing the middle has shrunk. That means whichever party is best able to find room for the fu­ture Lugars and Hold­ens will be the one with a head start at hold­ing the Con­gress in the years to come.

What We're Following See More »
HOSTAGE SITUATION
Multiple Deaths, Injuries from Van Attack in Barcelona
52 minutes ago
THE DETAILS
SAYS TRUMP JUST ATTACKING REPUBLICANS
Former Top Aide to McConnell Says GOPers Should Abandon Trump
53 minutes ago
THE LATEST
“PUBLICITY SEEKING”
Trump Blasts Graham, Flake on Twitter
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

As part of a twitter rant on Thursday morning, President Trump singled out Republican Sens. Jeff Flake and Lindsey Graham for criticism. He said Flake is "WEAK on borders, crime and a non-factor in Senate. He's toxic!" Trump also named Flake's primary challenger, Kelli Ward. He said Graham's contention that Trump suggested a moral equivalence between the neo-Nazis in Charlottesville and the counter-protesters is a "disgusting lie."

Source:
“YOU CAN’T CHANGE HISTORY, BUT YOU CAN LEARN FROM IT”
Trump Defends Confederate Statues in Tweetstorm
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
CEOS HAVE BEEN FLEEING FOR THE EXITS
Trump to End Business Councils
1 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login