Politics: White House

Merkel, Obama on Friendship

Add to Briefcase
June 7, 2011, 10:40 a.m.

A Pub­lic Policy Polling (D) (IVR) poll; con­duc­ted 9/30-10/2; sur­veyed 834 LVs; mar­gin of er­ror +/- 3.4% (re­lease, 10/5). Party ID break­down: 37%R, 36%D, 27%I.

Ritter As Gov.

- RVs RVs RVs - All Dem GOP Ind Men Wom 8/8 5/16 3/8 Ap­prove 38% 68% 8% 37% 33% 42% 33% 34% 38% Dis­ap­prove 49 18 81 44 54 43 50 52 50

(For more from this poll, please see today’s CO GOV story.)

NA­TION­AL HAR­BOR, Mary­land — How many ships does the Navy need?

That de­pends on whom you ask, but top Navy of­fi­cials ar­gued be­fore the nav­al com­munity’s biggest an­nu­al con­fer­ence this week that the mod­ern 300-ship fleet the Pentagon wants by 2020 will be just as cap­able and power­ful as Re­agan-era fleets twice as large.

What the U.S. needs, ar­gued Navy Sec­ret­ary Ray Mabus, was “enough of the right kind of ships to do the mis­sions as­signed,” in a Wed­nes­day speech to the Navy League’s Sea-Air-Space expo.

There’s a reas­on he left a num­ber out of that phrase. The size of the Navy has long been a de­bate pop­u­lated by ad­mir­als and petty of­ficers, ship­build­ers and sup­pli­ers, hawks and doves, and every mil­it­ary blog­ger with a key­board. But try find­ing 10 true be­liev­ers in that crew for the “right” num­ber of Navy ships and you’ll find 10 dif­fer­ent re­li­gions.

The Navy has fluc­tu­ated between hav­ing a few hun­dred ships and the roughly 7,000-ship fleet at the height of World War II. For the past six years, the Navy has en­dorsed grow­ing to a 313-ship fleet but struggled to meet that goal amid rising costs and shrink­ing budgets. The num­ber “313” be­came a pier-side talk­ing point, de­tached from oth­er factors such as in­creased fire­power, joint war-fight­ing along­side the Air Force and oth­er ser­vices, and glob­al de­ploy­ment op­tions.

“It’s good short­hand for an easy de­bate,” said Dav­id J. Ber­teau, dir­ect­or of the in­ter­na­tion­al se­cur­ity pro­gram at the non­par­tis­an Cen­ter for Stra­tegic and In­ter­na­tion­al Stud­ies. He re­called the fight over a 600-ship fleet cham­pioned by Pres­id­ent Re­agan’s tough-talk­ing Navy sec­ret­ary, John Leh­man. The num­ber only got to 594.

But num­bers do mat­ter more to the Navy than oth­er ser­vices, Ber­teau ar­gues, be­cause it must re­main for­ward-de­ployed to be use­ful on short no­tice, and ships can move only so fast. The Air Force flies non­stop from the U.S. to Afgh­anistan, re­fuel­ing in flight. The Army in­her­ently takes longer to move; it would be im­possible to po­s­i­tion thou­sands of tanks on every con­tin­ent.

Chief of Nav­al Op­er­a­tions Jonath­an Green­ert said on Monday that the Navy cur­rently has 282 ships. Ship count­ing alone, however, is mean­ing­less. The Navy has oth­er budget­ary pri­or­it­ies — its people, for one — and it wants to save money by keep­ing more ships de­ployed for longer cycles, de­pend­ing on res­pites at friendly places like Singa­pore and Diego Gar­cia.

Still, in Janu­ary, the Pentagon re­duced the num­ber of ships to be built in the next five years from 57 to 41 ves­sels, caus­ing alarm among ana­lysts and ship­build­ers. “How many ships do we need to im­ple­ment the na­tion­al strategy of today? That’s the only ques­tion that should both­er us,” ar­gued Navy Un­der­sec­ret­ary Robert Work, the branch’s ac­quis­i­tions chief, while on a fea­tured pan­el at the con­ven­tion. Work agreed with the pro­pos­i­tion that, with just 300 mod­ern ships, the U.S. today would re­tain “90 per­cent of the com­bat power” held by the 600-ship Navy of the 1980s.

Dur­ing this peri­od of budget un­cer­tainty, con­tract­ors are guess­ing what Con­gress might do. “If we lose fund­ing, or that fund­ing is in­ter­rup­ted by a num­ber of years, we run the risk of los­ing those em­ploy­ees,” said Timothy McGee, a mil­it­ary-busi­ness de­vel­op­ment man­ager for Ex­lar Corp., which builds ac­tu­at­ors that will move the weapons el­ev­at­or on the next air­craft car­ri­er, the USS Ger­ald Ford. “We need to plan for what hap­pens next.”

Can hawks get more ships built than the pres­id­ent wants? Rep. Robert Wittman, R-Va., chair­man of the House Armed Ser­vices Sub­com­mit­tee on Over­sight and In­vest­ig­a­tions, main­tained in a hear­ing this week that “every” top-rank­ing Pa­cific nav­al of­ficer he met says that main­tain­ing a high-tempo pres­ence over­seas “keeps him up at night.”¦ Where gaps ex­ist, oth­er coun­tries such as Ir­an and China will fill the voids.”

The “short­falls” in Pres­id­ent Obama’s re­quest, Wittman ar­gued, would leave the U.S. “short” of the num­ber of at­tack sub­mar­ines, large sur­face com­bat ships, and am­phi­bi­ous-war­fare ships “we need.”

Find­ing the right num­ber of ships will re­main elu­sive. In­deed, Vice Adm. Wil­li­am Burke, deputy chief of nav­al op­er­a­tions for fleet read­i­ness and lo­gist­ics, test­i­fied last month that the Navy ideally would need 500 ships. House Armed Ser­vices Chair­man Buck McK­eon, R-Cal­if., has talked about ex­ceed­ing 700 ships, but doesn’t of­fer a pre­ferred num­ber for today’s Navy.

Work notes that form­al fleet re­views since the 1980s have called for num­bers between 308 and 313. As cap­ab­il­it­ies grew, Navy re­quire­ments have re­mained “sur­pris­ingly con­stant.” So has the ca­pa­city of Wash­ing­ton to keep play­ing the num­bers game.

What We're Following See More »
Former Top Aide to McConnell Says GOPers Should Abandon Trump
14 hours ago
Trump Defends Confederate Statues in Tweetstorm
18 hours ago
Trump to End Business Councils
1 days ago
McConnell: “No Good Neo-Nazis”
1 days ago
CBC Members Call for Removal of Confederate Statues from Capitol
1 days ago

"Members of the Congressional Black Caucus are reviving calls to remove Confederate statues from the Capitol following the violence at a white nationalist rally in Virginia." Rep. Cedric Richmond, the group's chair, told ABC News that "we will never solve America's race problem if we continue to honor traitors who fought against the United States." And Mississippi Rep. Bennie Thompson said, “Confederate memorabilia have no place in this country and especially not in the United States Capitol." But a CBC spokesperson said no formal legislative effort is afoot.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.