New Hampshire or Iowa: Where Republicans Should Place Their Chips

Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
June 13, 2011, 7:25 p.m.

WH sr. ad­viser Dav­id Axel­rod said 10/6 that Ex-MA Gov. Mitt Rom­ney (R) “is to be among the field” of GOP can­did­ates vy­ing to chal­lenge Pres. Obama for WH ‘12.

Rom­ney is “cer­tainly go­ing to run,” said Axel­rod, who in­tends to leave the WH some­time in ‘11 “to be­gin work­ing on Obama’s reelec­tion cam­paign.”

Axel­rod: “You know, he star­ted off as a mod­er­ate Re­pub­lic­an in Mas­sachu­setts — passed a health care plan very sim­il­ar to the pres­id­ent’s health care plan. And I al­ways thought that if he had just stuck to who he was, he would be a far more for­mid­able can­did­ate. But he’s try­ing to cater to the right wing of that party, and I don’t think that’s a pre­scrip­tion for vic­tory” (O’Bri­en, The Hill, 10/7).

Fold­ing The Re­li­gion Card

Rom­ney “was out stump­ing” for ID Gov. Butch Ot­ter (R) on 10/6. “The pair kept to their talk­ing points - the im­port­ance of keep­ing budgets small and cut­ting spend­ing.”

ID busi­ness­man Frank Vander­sloot opened the rally by com­ment­ing on act­iv­ist/ex-Har­vard prof./GOV nom­in­ee Keith Allred’s (D) cam­paign, “say­ing Allred is telling people to vote for him be­cause he’s Mor­mon.” Vander­sloot: “My an­swer to that is, well, Harry Re­id’s a Mor­mon.”

Vander­sloot him­self be­longs to the LDS church - and so does Rom­ney. “Rom­ney’s pres­ence was ex­pec­ted to boost sup­port from LDS voters,” but he “didn’t talk about re­li­gion;” in­stead, he cri­ti­cized big gov’t. Rom­ney: “They’re smoth­er­ing the spir­it that makes Amer­ica such an en­gine of vi­tal­ity and growth. We’re not go­ing to let them do that” (KIVI-TV, 10/7).

Look­ing Ahead

Rom­ney’s next stop in MN “is aimed at help­ing fuel the state GOP fin­an­cially with two weeks left” be­fore the Nov. elec­tion.

Rom­ney plans to be in Bloom­ing­ton for a “high-buck fun­draiser” on 10/18. The goal is to raise $5K per couple (AP, 10/7).

Mitt Rom­ney’s May Day plan seemed pretty reas­on­able for a man who had been sys­tem­at­ic­ally and suc­cess­fully clear­ing his path to the Re­pub­lic­an pres­id­en­tial nom­in­a­tion for more than a year.

Re­pub­lic­ans had been quietly din­ging Pres­id­ent Obama throughout the pre­vi­ous week­end for ap­pear­ing to be tak­ing a vic­tory lap lead­ing up to the an­niversary of the killing of Osama bin Laden.

The Obama cam­paign helped the GOP’s case by post­ing a Web video fea­tur­ing Bill Clin­ton prais­ing Obama for mak­ing the right de­cision on that dra­mat­ic night one year ago. Sen. John Mc­Cain, R-Ar­iz., de­cried it as a “shame­less end-zone dance” de­signed to aid the pres­id­ent’s reelec­tion in a news re­lease. “I’ve had the great hon­or of serving in the com­pany of her­oes,” Mc­Cain also told Bill O’Re­illy on Fox News. “And you know the thing about her­oes? They don’t brag.”

This story line seemed to be gath­er­ing some mo­mentum—right up un­til around mid­day Tues­day. That’s when ru­mors began to swirl that the end-zone-dan­cing pres­id­ent was on his way to Afgh­anistan.

The next 24 hours provided an in­con­tro­vert­ible les­son in the powers of in­cum­bency.

First, there was the secrecy. The pres­id­ent was spir­ited off to An­drews Air Force base at mid­night on Monday, while the rest of us made ready for a night’s sleep. While he was in the air with a press pool sworn to secrecy (their mo­bile devices were taken away to drive home that point), the cov­er was briefly blown on Tues­day morn­ing by a single ran­dom tweet that got picked up on­line by the New York Post and the Drudge Re­port. But once the White House got wind of that, the New York Post re­moved the con­tent while Drudge Re­port pos­ted the White House deni­al that the pres­id­ent had already landed.

Of course, in our Web age, noth­ing can be com­pletely wiped clean. And by mid­day, still-mum news or­gan­iz­a­tions—in­clud­ing the PBS News­Hour—began to move re­sources in­to po­s­i­tion to cov­er what would be a dra­mat­ic six-hour pres­id­en­tial war-zone vis­it.

While all of this was go­ing on, the Rom­ney forces ex­ecuted their own plan for the day. The can­did­ate, who was in New York, did a little morn­ing tele­vi­sion, met privately with May­or Mi­chael Bloomberg, picked up some pizza for a vis­it with fire­fight­ers, and ap­peared be­fore cam­er­as in the com­pany of former May­or Rudy Gi­uliani.

The idea was to con­trast what Re­pub­lic­ans saw as the Obama cam­paign’s ex­ploit­a­tion of the bin Laden an­niversary with Rom­ney’s low-key New York vis­it, which would stir 9/11 memor­ies without ap­pear­ing to make it too big of a deal.

Gi­uliani was on hand to act as the sur­rog­ate who cri­ti­cized the pres­id­ent’s tri­umphal­ism, and—aside from one per­sist­ent and loud New York heck­ler—everything was go­ing ac­cord­ing to plan.

But then the pres­id­ent landed at Ba­gram Air­field un­der cov­er of dark­ness. And the rest of the day it be­came—”Mitt who?”

This is the way of the me­dia world. We love sur­prises. The pres­id­ent pop­ping up in Ka­bul was a whale of a sur­prise. Mitt Rom­ney eat­ing pizza with fire­fight­ers was not.

We are cap­tiv­ated by danger. Any scen­ario that in­volves Air Force One jet­ting in­to a war zone with its win­dows blacked out, well, fills that bill. And we ad­ore pre­ced­ent. A pres­id­ent de­liv­er­ing a live ad­dress from said war zone at 4 a.m. Ka­bul time (at the tail end of the even­ing news broad­casts on the U.S. East Coast) qual­i­fies. New York street heck­lers may be an­noy­ing, but they are sel­dom dan­ger­ous.

Rom­ney was ef­fect­ively shut down. It’s a heck of a lot easi­er to ques­tion a chal­lenger’s pat­ri­ot­ic motives when he is on the cam­paign trail with you than when he is half a world away high-fiv­ing with cam­ou­flage-clad Amer­ic­an troops.

That’s when it’s great to be the guy who’s got the job already.

But even a good day can get knocked off course. Even as the pres­id­ent was bar­rel­ing out of Ka­bul be­fore the sun rose, a dip­lo­mat­ic mess was un­fold­ing roughly 2,600 miles away in China. There, a sym­path­et­ic blind dis­sid­ent es­caped from home de­ten­tion and holed up in the U.S. Em­bassy just as Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Rod­ham Clin­ton was due to ar­rive for talks with the Chinese gov­ern­ment.

By week’s end, it would all turn in­to a sticky dip­lo­mat­ic mess. If an ex­ten­ded vic­tory lap was on the pres­id­ent’s agenda, it was cut bru­tally short.

It turns out there is a down­side to in­cum­bency, too.

What We're Following See More »
Byrd Rule Could Trip Up Health Legislation
20 hours ago

"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”

Senate Votes To Fund Government
23 hours ago
House Passes Spending Bill
1 days ago

The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.

Puerto Rico Another Sticking Point in Budget Talks
1 days ago

President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."

Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
1 days ago

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.