Politics: National Security

Clinton Defends Afghanistan Drawdown

Add to Briefcase
June 23, 2011, 9:02 a.m.

Ex-Rep. Joe Dio­Guardi (R) “re­spon­ded” 10/7 to Sen. Kirsten Gil­librand’s (D) TV ads that “char­ac­ter­izes” Dio­Guardi “as a tax cheat with a re­cord of waste­ful spend­ing while in Con­gress in the 1980s.”

Want More On This Race? Check out the Hot­line Dash­board for a com­pre­hens­ive run­down of this race, in­clud­ing stor­ies, polls, ads, FEC num­bers, and more!

Dio­Guardi: “I know how to pre­pare my taxes. It is des­per­ate for the sen­at­or to go back to 1978. I pre­pared prob­ably 55 tax re­turns and one was audited. This was a nor­mal audit. I was in a part­ner­ship on that re­turn, it wasn’t me alone, with three oth­er part­ners of my old firm.”

Dio­Guardi, on if GOP­ers will sup­port him: “They are now. I was at a din­ner last night with Re­pub­lic­an Chair­man of New York State Ed Cox. Every­one is sup­port­ing me.” Dio­Guardi, on abor­tion: “I will agree with the laws of the land right now. But in this is­sue, I be­lieve that life is pre­cious. I be­lieve the prob­lem is the over­whelm­ing num­ber of un­wanted preg­nan­cies in Amer­ica.” Dio­Guardi, on cam­paign­ing with his daugh­ter/ex-Amer­ic­an Idol judge Kara Dio­Guardi: “Her is­sues are in Hol­ly­wood and mine with Wash­ing­ton. … She has done more to get people to pro­nounce my name right and spell it right than any­body” (Har­tung/Delargy, “Polit­ic­al Hot­sheet”, CBS News, 10/7).

More Dio­Guardi, on Kara: “I don’t want to get her branded in polit­ics. … She just got mar­ried. I would like to be a grand­fath­er” (Fer­mino, New York Post, 10/7).

All In A Past Life

Dio­Guardi “said” 10/7 that he “isn’t cur­rently” a “prac­ti­cing” CPA. He “let his CPA re­gis­tra­tion” lapse in 1996 and “only re-re­gis­terd” 10/5 “after of­fi­cials told him he had to do it if he wanted to use the titles ‘Cer­ti­fied Pub­lic Ac­count­ant’ or ‘CPA.’”

Dio­Guardi: “I’m a CPA. But I’m not a prac­ti­cing CPA.” Dio­Guardi “sends out a daily e-mail: ‘State of the Day from a CPA.’” Dio­Guardi “blamed the lapse” on “cir­cum­stances,” such as his first wife be­ing “ter­min­ally ill at the time of re­gis­tra­tion re­new­al, and the state mailed the re­gis­tra­tion form to the wrong ad­dress and it wasn’t for­war­ded” (Brune, News­day, 10/7).

Christine Mastin, an im­mig­ra­tion at­tor­ney whose Span­ish-speak­ing grand­moth­er emig­rated from Chile to the United States, real­izes that most of the His­pan­ics she knows are sur­prised she is a Re­pub­lic­an.

Barack Obama won two-thirds of the Latino vote in 2008, and no Re­pub­lic­an has come close to win­ning a ma­jor­ity in 40 years. But she is work­ing Col­or­ado for Mitt Rom­ney.

And even though she ran for a state House seat in 2010 and lost, she is op­tim­ist­ic that the GOP will soon be able to crack the code.

“Maybe it might strike folks a little odd that I would be a Re­pub­lic­an,” she told me re­cently. “But the Re­pub­lic­ans truly be­lieve in in­di­vidu­al liberty, hard work, en­tre­pren­eur­i­al­ism, al­low­ing fam­il­ies to build them­selves up and really suc­ceed in this coun­try. And all of those val­ues are aligned not only with Amer­ica gen­er­ally, but also the Latino com­munity.”

This is a pitch Re­pub­lic­ans hope will re­verse a grow­ing demo­graph­ic di­lemma. U.S. census fig­ures now es­tim­ate that more chil­dren of col­or are be­ing born than Caucasi­ans. This is not good news for a party that has been largely de­pend­ent on white voters.

Many Re­pub­lic­ans know how these num­bers work. Pres­id­ent George W. Bush spoke ex­pans­ively about big tents and the value of (leg­al) im­mig­ra­tion. At a cam­paign ap­pear­ance re­cently in South Flor­ida, Mitt Rom­ney con­ceded that fail­ing to win more of the His­pan­ic vote would spell “doom” for the GOP. But when he ar­rived in Wash­ing­ton this week to speak to a Latino busi­ness group, he sailed through his speech with not one men­tion of the demo­graph­ic di­lemma.

How much of a di­lemma? Check out this graph­ic from The Wash­ing­ton Post.

One chart shows the rate at which His­pan­ics have voted for Re­pub­lic­ans (slug­gish), while the oth­er shows the rate at which the His­pan­ic pop­u­la­tion is grow­ing (ro­bust).

“When Bill Clin­ton was elec­ted pres­id­ent of the United States, about 3.7 per­cent of the elect­or­ate was Latino,” Stan­ford polit­ic­al sci­ent­ist Gary Se­gura told me. “In this elec­tion year, it will be just un­der 10 per­cent. So the votes more or less tripled. And when you have that many more people and that many more voters, they mat­ter in more places.”

Se­gura calls it “demo­graph­ic pan­ic.”

Moreover, Se­gura points out that the story no longer be­gins and ends in Flor­ida, Texas, and Cali­for­nia. “We are sur­prised to hear that Lati­nos count in places like Wis­con­sin,” he says, “or Pennsylvania, or Vir­gin­ia — places that we don’t think of as Latino-in­tens­ive states but where there’s a grow­ing Latino pop­u­la­tion and a grow­ing Latino elect­or­ate.”

It is no ac­ci­dent that those are also 2012 battle­ground states. That’s why I went to Col­or­ado to try to tell the story this year. You’ll see what I dis­covered on an up­com­ing PBS News­Hour broad­cast. But suf­fice to say, the GOP’s up­hill battle is clear.

Ry­an Call, the Col­or­ado Re­pub­lic­an Party chair­man who learned to speak Span­ish as a Mor­mon mis­sion­ary, says his goal is to con­vince His­pan­ic voters that Barack Obama has failed them.

“The price of gas doubled un­der Barack Obama’s ad­min­is­tra­tion,” he says. “Those are the is­sues that are really hit­ting the His­pan­ic com­munity the hard­est. And those are is­sues that the pres­id­ent has really failed on. So for us as Re­pub­lic­ans, how are we go­ing to ap­peal to this His­pan­ic com­munity? It’s talk­ing about those is­sues and out­lining with great clar­ity and prin­ciple how we’re go­ing to help cre­ate op­por­tun­it­ies for their busi­nesses to suc­ceed, jobs to be had, op­por­tun­it­ies for high­er edu­ca­tion. Those are the things that are the most im­port­ant to our His­pan­ic neigh­bors.”

It may be a tough­er sell to con­vince His­pan­ics that Re­pub­lic­ans sup­port their views on il­leg­al im­mig­ra­tion, which con­cen­trate on law en­force­ment and shrink­ing the path­way to cit­izen­ship.

While polls show that most His­pan­ics do not cite im­mig­ra­tion as their chief con­cern, Demo­crats and some wor­ried Re­pub­lic­ans ac­know­ledge it is an emo­tion­al, gate­way is­sue for first- or second-gen­er­a­tion Latino-Amer­ic­ans who might oth­er­wise be per­suaded to con­sider vot­ing for a Re­pub­lic­an.

“The rhet­or­ic that came out of the primary cam­paign in the Re­pub­lic­an party was so neg­at­ive to Lati­nos gen­er­ally that even Lati­nos who were not that sup­port­ive of im­mig­ra­tion re­form were of­fen­ded,” former Den­ver May­or Fe­d­erico Pena, a Demo­crat, told me. “So Re­pub­lic­ans have an up­hill climb here, but we have the chal­lenge of mak­ing sure that the ex­cite­ment level, the mo­tiv­a­tion, the en­thu­si­asm is there not only among Lati­nos, but among all Demo­crats.”

There’s the rub. En­thu­si­asm ap­pears to be an elu­sive com­mod­ity this elec­tion year. Between now and the fall, an old for­mula will have to fall in­to place —  each party will have to do its best to ex­cite its base and de­press the op­pos­i­tion. A lot of that activ­ity will hap­pen in His­pan­ic com­munit­ies.

What We're Following See More »
TRUMP CONTINUES TO LAWYER UP
Kasowitz Out, John Dowd In
1 days ago
THE LATEST

As the Russia investigation heats up, "the role of Marc E. Kasowitz, the president’s longtime New York lawyer, will be significantly reduced. Mr. Trump liked Mr. Kasowitz’s blunt, aggressive style, but he was not a natural fit in the delicate, politically charged criminal investigation. The veteran Washington defense lawyer John Dowd will take the lead in representing Mr. Trump for the Russia inquiry."

Source:
ALSO INQUIRES ABOUT PARDON POWER
Trump Looking to Discredit Mueller
1 days ago
THE LATEST

President Trump's attorneys are "actively compiling a list of Mueller’s alleged potential conflicts of interest, which they say could serve as a way to stymie his work." They plan to argued that Mueller is going outside the scope of his investigation, in inquiring into Trump's finances. They're also playing small ball, highlighting "donations to Democrats by some of" Mueller's team, and "an allegation that Mueller and Trump National Golf Club in Northern Virginia had a dispute over membership fees when Mueller resigned as a member in 2011." Trump is said to be incensed that Mueller may see his tax returns, and has been asking about his power to pardon his family members.

Source:
INCLUDES NY PROBE INTO MANAFORT
Why Yes, Mueller Is Looking into Trump Businesses
1 days ago
THE LATEST

In addition to ties between Russia and the Trump campaign, Robert Mueller's team is also "examining a broad range of transactions involving Trump’s businesses as well as those of his associates, according to a person familiar with the probe. FBI investigators and others are looking at Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a controversial SoHo development in New York with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow, and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008, the person said. The investigation also has absorbed a money-laundering probe begun by federal prosecutors in New York into Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort."

Source:
Mueller Expands Probe to Trump Business Transactions
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team is "is examining a broad range of transactions involving Trump’s businesses as well as those of his associates", including "Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a controversial SoHo development with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008."

Source:
ANALYSIS FROM CBO
32 Million More Uninsured by 2026 if Obamacare Repealed
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"A Senate bill to gut Obamacare would increase the number of uninsured people by 32 million and double premiums on Obamacare's exchanges by 2026, according to an analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The analysis is of a bill that passed Congress in 2015 that would repeal Obamacare's taxes and some of the mandates. Republicans intend to leave Obamacare in place for two years while a replacement is crafted and implemented."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login