Politics: Campaign 2012

What’s at Stake for the White House in Deficit-Reduction Deal

Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
June 26, 2011, 6:53 p.m.

Fri­day nights “are re­served for fish fries, high-school foot­ball and re­cov­er­ing from the work­week.” All of which “sug­gests the tele­vi­sion audi­ence for the first de­bate” this p.m. between Sen. Russ Fein­gold (D) and busi­ness­man Ron John­son (R) “is not ex­pec­ted to cap­ture a big audi­ence.”

The “con­sensus is that Fein­gold,” will “be ag­gress­ive in de­fend­ing his own three-term re­cord in the Sen­ate.” Fein­gold “also will be ex­pec­ted to ques­tion John­son’s stands on the ma­jor is­sues, in­clud­ing the state of the eco­nomy, So­cial Se­cur­ity and the health care law.”

Want More On This Race? Check out the Hot­line Dash­board for a com­pre­hens­ive run­down of this race, in­clud­ing stor­ies, polls, ads, FEC num­bers, and more!

As for John­son, “it will be” his first op­por­tun­ity “to in­tro­duce him­self on live TV to voters. He will make his case that voters want a fresh face” in DC (Walk­er, Mil­wau­kee Journ­al-Sen­tinel, 10/7).

A source fa­mil­i­ar with John­son’s de­bate pre­par­a­tions: “This is go­ing to be a chance for voters to see a politi­cian who has been part of the prob­lem in Wash­ing­ton. His spend­ing policies have done noth­ing to cre­ate jobs here. Ron’s go­ing to make this case high­light­ing his real world ex­per­i­ence” (Hot­line re­port­ing, 10/8).

Sur­prise Party

John­son said 10/7 that he wanted to win “by a sur­pris­ing mar­gin” in or­der to send a mes­sage to DC to cut spend­ing and get the na­tion’s debt­load un­der con­trol. John­son made an ap­pear­ance on Charlie Sykes’ WTMJ-AM (Ra­dio 620) show. John­son: “I want to win this thing. I want to win this thing by a sur­pris­ing mar­gin.”

10/7, John­son’s cam­paign “launched an all-day” on­line fun­drais­ing cam­paign. John­son said the fun­drais­ing was a way to tap in­to the Tea Party move­ment and en­list sup­port­ers who have nev­er been in­volved in polit­ics be­fore (Walk­er, “All Polit­ics,” Mil­wau­kee Journ­al-Sen­tinel, 10/7).

Mmm, Double Down

Fein­gold “is doub­ling-down” on a “proven strategy in his ef­fort to sur­vive” the rising GOP tide in WI: Get “troves of young people to the polls, and do it early.”

The “met­ric Fein­gold’s camp wants to meet is daunt­ing”: Match the re­cord 15% who came out early for the ‘08 pres. race. That amounts to nearly 300K voters — a “num­ber that’s nearly twice the amount of in-per­son early vot­ing that oc­curred” dur­ing the ‘06 midterm elec­tion.

Fein­gold: You don’t have to have every­body who voted for Obama to turnout. Even if it’s 15 per­cent of those who voted for the first time for Obama come out, these Re­pub­lic­ans and [Ron] John­son are go­ing to find that they’re go­ing to lose.”

John­son “doesn’t ap­pear to be fazed by his op­pon­ent’s ag­gress­ive early vot­ing op­er­a­tion.” John­son: “I think it’s just ab­sent­ee. I don’t think there’s a big con­cer­ted ef­fort here for early vot­ing” (His spokes­per­son later cla­ri­fied his com­ment as a com­par­at­ive ref­er­ence to Fein­gold’s ef­forts, stress­ing that “we have hun­dreds of vo­lun­teers call­ing these voters.”)

There “is some evid­ence to jus­ti­fy Fein­gold’s cam­pus gam­bit.” Youth turnout in WI “was second highest in the na­tion” dur­ing ‘06, ac­cord­ing to stat­ist­ics com­piled by the Cen­ter for In­form­a­tion and Re­search on Civic Learn­ing and En­gage­ment. While the na­tion­wide turnout rate for those between the ages of 18 and 29 was 26% dur­ing the last midterm, in WI it reached 40% (Catanese, Politico, 10/7).

Soft Serve

The WI GOP “is al­leging” Fein­gold is soft on ter­ror­ists — spe­cific­ally Osama bin Laden. In an in­ter­view with WKOW 27 News in Madis­on, Fein­gold was asked about what ought to be the fate of bin Laden. Fein­gold: “I would prefer to see him get the ul­ti­mate pun­ish­ment in a bat­tle­field set­ting.” Asked wheth­er a cap­tured bin Laden “de­serves to be ex­ecuted for his crimes,” Fein­gold re­spon­ded “he de­serves to be ex­ecuted for his crimes, but I am a per­son who does not be­lieve we should use ex­e­cu­tion as a means of our justice sys­tem.”

That’s “not a new stand” by Fein­gold, and “it’s one which would ap­pear to puts him on the same page as” AG Eric Hold­er and the DoJ. But WI GOP chair Re­ince Priebus calls that po­s­i­tion out­rageous (Hag­ue, Wis­con­sin Ra­dio Net­work, 10/6).

Gov. Scott Walk­er’s de­cis­ive vic­tory in last night’s Wis­con­sin gubernat­ori­al re­call served as a telling bench­mark for the pres­id­en­tial elec­tion, sug­gest­ing that Mitt Rom­ney stands a good chance of com­pet­ing with Pres­id­ent Obama in the Demo­crat­ic-lean­ing Rust Belt states. Next week’s spe­cial elec­tion in Ari­zona, to re­place former Demo­crat­ic Rep. Gab­ri­elle Gif­fords, will lend equal in­sight on the con­gres­sion­al state of play for Novem­ber.

The race on Tues­day pits Demo­crat Ron Barber, Gif­fords’s former dis­trict dir­ect­or who was in­jured in last year’s Tuc­son shoot­ing, against Re­pub­lic­an Jesse Kelly, an out­spoken tea party act­iv­ist and mil­it­ary vet­er­an who lost to Gif­fords in the 2010 midterms. The battle is be­ing waged in a Re­pub­lic­an-lean­ing Tuc­son dis­trict, but one filled with the type of voters Demo­crats will need to win over to main­tain con­trol of the Sen­ate and be com­pet­it­ive in the House — seni­ors and busi­ness-friendly in­de­pend­ents.

For those ex­pect­ing a po­lite, above-the-fray cam­paign giv­en the cir­cum­stances sur­round­ing the race, think again. This spe­cial elec­tion be­came a highly neg­at­ive, per­son­al cam­paign pre­cisely be­cause it’s serving to test-drive the themes that both Demo­crats and Re­pub­lic­ans are plan­ning to util­ize across the battle­ground map. The polit­ic­al stakes are so high that ci­vil­ity is once again tak­ing a back seat to polit­ics as usu­al.

This spe­cial elec­tion provides a ma­jor test of the emer­ging con­gres­sion­al Demo­crat­ic mes­sage for 2012: Re­pub­lic­ans have be­come be­hold­en to the tea party and want to decim­ate the so­cial safety net through cuts to en­ti­tle­ments like Medi­care and So­cial Se­cur­ity. In Kelly, the party has a per­fect foil. In 2010, the former Mar­ine ran a race that re­lied on con­ser­vat­ive straight talk at the ex­pense of his polit­ic­al stand­ing. Gif­fords was one of the few vul­ner­able House Demo­crats who won reelec­tion, be­cause voters viewed Kelly as too far to the right.

Kelly has un­der­gone something of a makeover for his second bid. But Demo­crats aren’t let­ting voters for­get about his past state­ments, air­ing a bar­rage of neg­at­ive cam­paign ads ac­cus­ing him of want­ing to elim­in­ate So­cial Se­cur­ity and Medi­care. One of the latest spots, com­mis­sioned by the House Ma­jor­ity su­per PAC, re­vis­its his heated rhet­or­ic against Gif­fords dur­ing last elec­tion cycle.

Re­pub­lic­ans, mean­while, see an equally prom­ising op­por­tun­ity with this spe­cial elec­tion, and be­lieve they have a fight­ing chance to win a seat that un­der nor­mal cir­cum­stances should have been very tough to pick up. They view this race as a sign that the polit­ic­al en­vir­on­ment is turn­ing so pois­on­ous for Pres­id­ent Obama and down-bal­lot Demo­crats that even a ho­met­own hero won’t be able to hang onto the seat that his old boss won un­der dif­fi­cult cir­cum­stances in 2010.  

In­tern­al polling from both sides shows that Obama is deeply un­pop­u­lar in the dis­trict. The Na­tion­al Re­pub­lic­an Con­gres­sion­al Com­mit­tee has been in­und­at­ing the dis­trict with ads ac­cus­ing Barber of want­ing to “rub­ber-stamp the Obama-[Nancy] Pelosi agenda.” The na­tion­al party brand is so tox­ic that Barber wouldn’t even say he was vot­ing for Obama at a re­cent de­bate, be­fore cla­ri­fy­ing his sup­port later. 

Fur­ther­more, Re­pub­lic­ans be­lieve they’ve iden­ti­fied a way to in­ocu­late them­selves on the en­ti­tle­ment at­tacks — simply re­peat the ar­gu­ment that Obama cut Medi­care be­ne­fits him­self with his un­pop­u­lar health care law.  After suf­fer­ing a sting­ing de­feat last year in a New York spe­cial elec­tion over en­ti­tle­ments, the na­tion­al cam­paign com­mit­tee re­tooled and util­ized that mes­sage to com­fort­ably win a Re­pub­lic­an-lean­ing Nevada House seat. This race is the rub­ber match for that mes­sage — a win here would sig­nal that the Obama and Demo­crat­ic at­tacks paint­ing the GOP as ex­treme on en­ti­tle­ments might not fly as eas­ily as ex­pec­ted. Re­pub­lic­an cam­paign of­fi­cials say that des­pite Kelly’s vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies, seni­ors re­main solidly in the GOP camp, ac­cord­ing to their in­tern­al polling.

There’s also little doubt that the latest dis­mal jobs num­bers will play a role in the race, even as it’s un­clear who will bear the brunt of the im­pact. Obama stands to take a hit over the bad eco­nom­ic news, but will voters take out their frus­tra­tions on the pres­id­ent’s party, or the con­ser­vat­ive GOP House op­pos­i­tion? A Kelly vic­tory would sig­nal that down-bal­lot Demo­crats may be in as much trouble as Obama, giv­en the eco­nom­ic down­turn. If Barber wins, ex­pect a more level play­ing field for con­trol of the Sen­ate and House.

Early vot­ing star­ted on May 17, and while more re­gistered Re­pub­lic­ans than Demo­crats have cast bal­lots, the break­down so far is en­cour­aging for Barber giv­en the large GOP re­gis­tra­tion ad­vant­age in the dis­trict. Both sides be­lieve the early res­ults show the race is go­ing down to the wire. Gif­fords is par­ti­cip­at­ing in a last-minute get-out-the-vote con­cert this week for Barber, but hasn’t yet ap­peared in any ad­vert­ising on his be­half.

Spe­cial elec­tions don’t al­ways pre­dict the out­come of fu­ture elec­tions, but they can of­fer telling clues about the fu­ture polit­ic­al en­vir­on­ment. That ad­age is doubly sig­ni­fic­ant this month.  After Walk­er’s win Tues­day night, a Kelly vic­tory would be a sign that 2012 could very well be an­oth­er wave elec­tion for the Re­pub­lic­ans.

What We're Following See More »
Supreme Court Takes Up Trump Travel Ban
9 hours ago

The Supreme Court announced "that it would consider a challenge to President Trump’s latest effort to limit travel from countries said to pose a threat to the nation’s security." The case concerns Trump's most recent attempt to make good on a campaign promise "tainted by religious animus" and only questionably justified by national security concerns. The decision to take the case, called Trump v. Hawaii, comes almost exactly a year after Trump issued the first travel ban. The ban under consideration affects Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Chad and North Korea.

Schumer Meeting with Trump for Last-Ditch Meeting
13 hours ago
House Told to “Stay Flexible”
14 hours ago
House Is Heading Home
15 hours ago
Trump Hosting $100,000/Couple Fundraiser at Mar-a-Lago
16 hours ago

Even while Congress works to avoid a government shutdown at 5 p.m. today, "President Donald Trump will mark the first anniversary of his inauguration on Saturday with a celebration at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, with tickets starting at $100,000 a pair. That amount, according to the invitation, will pay for dinner and a photograph with the president. For $250,000, a couple can also take part in a roundtable." The event will boost the Trump presidential campaign and the RNC.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.